Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rural</strong> Development, Vol. 30, No. (4) pp. 421 - 432NIRD, Hyderabad.ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTUREINVOLVING COMMUNITY FOREFFECTIVE WATERSHEDDEVELOPMENTA.K. Jain * , M. Gopinath Reddy ** andM.S. Rama Mohan Rao ***ABSTRACTEvaluation <strong>of</strong> watershed development projects time and again revealed thatthe development to be sustainable, calls <strong>for</strong> involvement <strong>of</strong> beneficiaries at all stages<strong>of</strong> development process so as to trans<strong>for</strong>m them as Self-Managers. The existingapproaches in developing three watersheds under similar agro-climatic and socioeconomicconditions, developed by research, development and NGO agencies wereassessed to identify an appropriate organisational structure <strong>for</strong> developingwatersheds on a sustainable basis keeping productivity, conservation, livelihoods andequity concerns in harmony. The longitudinal approach (be<strong>for</strong>e and after situation)was adopted to measure the impact.People’s involvement was better in NGO managed watershed due to <strong>for</strong>mation<strong>of</strong> affinity groups such as SHGs and UGs which remained active even after completion<strong>of</strong> the programme. The study has established the need <strong>for</strong> strengthening local levelinstitution, by creating suitable institution at the district level, with capacities andcapabilities in managing resources on long term basis <strong>for</strong> improving productivityand ensuring livelihoods to the rural communities. Strengthening local levelinstitution with support from UGs <strong>for</strong>med at the village level to conserve and managethe resources related to crop production, livestock, water use and managing commonproperties would lead to sustainable development by trans<strong>for</strong>ming every individualas a partner <strong>of</strong> the programme. It is concluded that <strong>for</strong> sustainable development <strong>of</strong>watersheds, involvement <strong>of</strong> local level institutions supported by affinity groups andguided by technical persons at different levels on continuous basis was needed. Thenalone the primary stakeholders can trans<strong>for</strong>m into self-managers.IntroductionWatershed programmes as a strategy, <strong>for</strong>resource conservation and productivityincrease, through multidisciplinary approach<strong>for</strong> developing rainfed areas was initiatedduring early 1980s after gaining experiencefrom model watersheds as at G.R Halli(Karnataka), Fakot (Uttarakhand) and* Special Secretary to Government, Irrigation & Command Area Development Department, Government<strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. Email: jainifs@rediffmail.com** Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Centre <strong>for</strong> Economic and Social Studies (CESS), N.O. Campus, Begumpet, Hyderabad.Email: mgopinathreddy@gmail.com*** Team Leader, Monitoring Evaluation Learning and Documentation, IWMP, CES (Pvt) Ltd, Bangalore.Email: msrrao3@yahoo.com
422 A.K. Jain, M. Gopinath Reddy and M.S. Rama Mohan RaoSukhomajri (Haryana) (Dhruvanarayana, 1993)and subsequently through 43 modelwatersheds implemented during 1983 acrossthe country. Consequently, integratedwatershed development programme as amovement <strong>for</strong> overall development <strong>of</strong> rainfedagriculture in the country has beenoperationalised since the Seventh Five YearPlan (1987-92). Soon it was realised thatadoption <strong>of</strong> watershed technologies requirescollective and cooperative strategies amongindividual households and communities andhence, people’s participation was identifiedas the key factor in effective implementation<strong>of</strong> the programme (Ratna Reddy et. al 2010;Wani and Garg, 2009). Accordingly, integratedwatershed development programme withparticipatory approach was emphasised since1990s with focus on resource conservation <strong>for</strong>raising crop productivity and improvement inlivelihoods. The guidelines released in 1995provide a definite design <strong>for</strong> people-centredapproach integrating sustainable rurallivelihoods with watershed management(Turton, 2000). The strategy <strong>of</strong> watersheddevelopment evolved over time <strong>for</strong> promotingsustainable rural livelihoods is presented inTable 1.Table 1 : Watershed Approach in India on Time ScaleTime Line 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000Invention Soil and water Soil and water Resource Resource Resourceconservation Conservation conservation Conservation Conservationmeasures on measures measures and measures measures <strong>for</strong>watershed Operational productivity productivity improvedbasis in Research enhancement enhancement incomes toriverine Projects and measures measures theprojects Ravinous (model and land based communitywatersheds watersheds) livelihood andimprovements livelihoodmeasures improvementactivitiesStrategy Sectoral Area Area Holistic Improvementdevelopment development development <strong>of</strong> ruralthrougheconomymultidisciplinaryapproachApproach Top down and Top down and Multi - Participatory Participatorycontractual contractual disciplinary mode modeSustainability Not owned Area Partly owned Community Community& by the development by the ownership, ownership,Transparency community, through community, Community completeless multi- moderate Vigilant transparencytransparency disciplinary transparencyapproach, lesstransparencyPolicy Shift Departmental Departmental Departmental DPAP HariyaliProjects Projects Projects guidelines guidelinesJournal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rural</strong> Development, Vol. 30, No. 4, <strong>October</strong> - <strong>December</strong> : <strong>2011</strong>
- Page 3 and 4: Journal ofRural DevelopmentVol. 30
- Page 5 and 6: Journal of Rural Development, Vol.
- Page 7 and 8: Promoting E-Governance in Panchayat
- Page 9 and 10: Promoting E-Governance in Panchayat
- Page 11 and 12: Promoting E-Governance in Panchayat
- Page 13 and 14: Promoting E-Governance in Panchayat
- Page 15 and 16: Promoting E-Governance in Panchayat
- Page 17 and 18: Promoting E-Governance in Panchayat
- Page 19 and 20: Promoting E-Governance in Panchayat
- Page 21 and 22: Promoting E-Governance in Panchayat
- Page 23 and 24: Journal of Rural Development, Vol.
- Page 25 and 26: Climate Change and Rainfed Agricult
- Page 27 and 28: Climate Change and Rainfed Agricult
- Page 29 and 30: Climate Change and Rainfed Agricult
- Page 31: Climate Change and Rainfed Agricult
- Page 35 and 36: 424 A.K. Jain, M. Gopinath Reddy an
- Page 37 and 38: 426 A.K. Jain, M. Gopinath Reddy an
- Page 39 and 40: 428 A.K. Jain, M. Gopinath Reddy an
- Page 41 and 42: 430 A.K. Jain, M. Gopinath Reddy an
- Page 43 and 44: 432 A.K. Jain, M. Gopinath Reddy an
- Page 45 and 46: 434 S.Mohanakumar, R.VipinkumarIntr
- Page 47 and 48: 436 S.Mohanakumar, R.VipinkumarTabl
- Page 49 and 50: 438 S.Mohanakumar, R.VipinkumarTabl
- Page 51 and 52: 440 S.Mohanakumar, R.VipinkumarForm
- Page 53 and 54: 442 S.Mohanakumar, R.Vipinkumarmuch
- Page 55 and 56: 444 S.Mohanakumar, R.VipinkumarEsta
- Page 57 and 58: 446 S.Mohanakumar, R.VipinkumarTabl
- Page 59 and 60: 448 S.Mohanakumar, R.VipinkumarTabl
- Page 61 and 62: 450 S.Mohanakumar, R.VipinkumarRefe
- Page 63 and 64: 452 B.B. Malik and Jaya Shrivastava
- Page 65 and 66: 454 B.B. Malik and Jaya Shrivastava
- Page 67 and 68: 456 B.B. Malik and Jaya Shrivastava
- Page 69 and 70: 458 B.B. Malik and Jaya Shrivastava
- Page 71 and 72: Journal of Rural Development, Vol.
- Page 73 and 74: Levels of Living of Rural Household
- Page 75 and 76: Levels of Living of Rural Household
- Page 77 and 78: Levels of Living of Rural Household
- Page 79 and 80: Levels of Living of Rural Household
- Page 81 and 82: Levels of Living of Rural Household
- Page 83 and 84:
Journal of Rural Development, Vol.
- Page 85 and 86:
The Pattern of the Distribution of
- Page 87 and 88:
The Pattern of the Distribution of
- Page 89 and 90:
The Pattern of the Distribution of
- Page 91 and 92:
The Pattern of the Distribution of
- Page 93 and 94:
The Pattern of the Distribution of
- Page 95 and 96:
The Pattern of the Distribution of
- Page 97 and 98:
Journal of Rural Development, Vol.
- Page 99 and 100:
Structural, Functional and Situatio
- Page 101 and 102:
Structural, Functional and Situatio
- Page 103 and 104:
Structural, Functional and Situatio
- Page 105 and 106:
Structural, Functional and Situatio
- Page 107 and 108:
Structural, Functional and Situatio
- Page 109 and 110:
Structural, Functional and Situatio
- Page 111 and 112:
502 Book ReviewsRole of Micro Finan
- Page 113 and 114:
504 Book ReviewsSardar Sarovar Proj