476 B.N.Shivalingappa and Sowmyashree K.LTable 1 : Proportion <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rural</strong> Aged Population Distribution (2001)Districts % <strong>of</strong> total rural aged % <strong>of</strong> rural male aged % <strong>of</strong> rural female agedpopulation to total population to total population to totalrural population rural male population rural female populationBelgaum 8.2 7.5 8.9Bagalkote 7.4 6.5 8.4Bijapura 8.2 7.6 9Gulbarga 7.4 6.6 8.2Bidar 8.5 8.1 9Raichur 6 5.2 6.9Koppal 6.4 5.3 7.5Gadag 7.9 6.7 9.1Dharwadh 7.7 7.1 8.4Uttar Kannada 8.1 7.5 8.7Haveri 7.2 6.6 7.9Bellary 6.5 5.7 7.4Chitradurga 8.7 8.5 8.9Davangere 7.8 7.3 8.5Shimogha 7.6 7.1 8.1Udupi 11 10.1 11.3Chikkamagaluru 8.3 8.1 8.5Tumkur 9.7 9.4 10Kolar 9.1 9 9.3Bangalore Urban 7 6.8 7.2Bangalore <strong>Rural</strong> 9.6 9.3 10Mandya 9.6 8.8 10.4Hassan 9.2 8.5 9.8Dakshina Kannada 8.4 8 8.8Kodagu 7.9 7.5 8.2Mysore 8.5 8 9Chamarajanagara 9.1 8.7 9.4Karnataka 8.2 7.7 8.8Source : Census <strong>of</strong> India 2001.Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rural</strong> Development, Vol. 30, No. 4, <strong>October</strong> - <strong>December</strong> : <strong>2011</strong>
The Pattern <strong>of</strong> the Distribution <strong>of</strong> Aged Population in <strong>Rural</strong> Karnataka : A Spatial Analysis 477Table 2 : Proportion <strong>of</strong> Aged Population and No. <strong>of</strong> DistrictsProportion Total Population Male Population Female Population<strong>Rural</strong> aged population No. <strong>of</strong> Districts No. <strong>of</strong> Districts No. <strong>of</strong> DistrictsHigh (< 9%) 7 (26) 3(11.1) 8 (29.6)Medium (7% – 9%) 16(59) 16(59.2) 18(66.6)Less (> 7%) 4(15) 8(29.6) 1(3.7)Total districts 27(100) 27(100) 27(100)Source : Compiled by the author.Figures in parentheses indicate per cent to total No. <strong>of</strong> districts.Areas <strong>of</strong> High Proportion : The area <strong>of</strong> highproportion stretches over seven districtscovering 26 per cent <strong>of</strong> the total districtswhere the proportion <strong>of</strong> the aged populationexceed 9 per cent and six <strong>of</strong> these districts arelocated in the southern part <strong>of</strong> the State, theyare Tumkur (9.7 per cent), Kolar (9.1 per cent),Bangalore rural (9.6 per cent), Mandya (9.6 percent), Hassan (9.2 per cent), Chamarajanagara(9.1 per cent) and one district namely Udupi(11 per cent) is located in the coastal area. Thehigh proportion <strong>of</strong> aged population in theseareas may be due to higher demographicdevelopment in terms <strong>of</strong> fertility, mortality, lifeexpectancy, literacy, sex ratio, urbanisation etc.which was revealed by Mohan Kumar’s study,(M.D. Mohan Kumar. 2007).Further, the area <strong>of</strong> higher proportion <strong>of</strong>female aged population stretches over eightdistricts and that <strong>of</strong> male proportion over threedistricts. This again is found in the southernand coastal Karnataka. It shows that area <strong>of</strong>high proportion <strong>of</strong> aged population is littlelarger <strong>for</strong> females (29.6 per cent) than <strong>for</strong>males.Areas <strong>of</strong> Moderate Proportion : Thepercentage <strong>of</strong> aged population between 7– 9per cent represents the medium proportion.The medium proportion <strong>of</strong> rural agedpopulation has been found in 16 districts;covering 59 per cent <strong>of</strong> the total districts. Thesedistricts are mainly concentrated in north, fewdistricts in coastal and south Karnataka.Medium proportion <strong>of</strong> male agedpopulation is noticed in 16 districts, covering59.2 per cent and that <strong>of</strong> females in 18 (66.6per cent). It means that area <strong>of</strong> mediumproportion <strong>of</strong> female aged population is alsolarger than its male counterpart.Areas <strong>of</strong> Low Proportion : In four districtsnamely, Raichur, Koppal, Bellary, and Bangalore(Urban), the proportion <strong>of</strong> aged populationdoes not exceed 7 per cent and three districts<strong>of</strong> them are located in the north-easternregion, where young population is morebecause <strong>of</strong> higher fertility rate and anotherdistrict is Bangalore Urban, which receivesmore in – migrants <strong>of</strong> relatively younger agegroups resulting in the high proportion <strong>of</strong>younger population than the aged population.Lower proportion <strong>of</strong> male aged isconcentrated in eight districts namely,Bagalkote, Gulbarga, Raichur, Koppal, Gadag,Haveri, Bellary and Bangalore Urban. Amongthese, except Bangalore Urban remainingseven districts are located in the northKarnataka. However, there is only one districtJournal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rural</strong> Development, Vol. 30, No. 4, <strong>October</strong> - <strong>December</strong> : <strong>2011</strong>
- Page 3 and 4:
Journal ofRural DevelopmentVol. 30
- Page 5 and 6:
Journal of Rural Development, Vol.
- Page 7 and 8:
Promoting E-Governance in Panchayat
- Page 9 and 10:
Promoting E-Governance in Panchayat
- Page 11 and 12:
Promoting E-Governance in Panchayat
- Page 13 and 14:
Promoting E-Governance in Panchayat
- Page 15 and 16:
Promoting E-Governance in Panchayat
- Page 17 and 18:
Promoting E-Governance in Panchayat
- Page 19 and 20:
Promoting E-Governance in Panchayat
- Page 21 and 22:
Promoting E-Governance in Panchayat
- Page 23 and 24:
Journal of Rural Development, Vol.
- Page 25 and 26:
Climate Change and Rainfed Agricult
- Page 27 and 28:
Climate Change and Rainfed Agricult
- Page 29 and 30:
Climate Change and Rainfed Agricult
- Page 31 and 32:
Climate Change and Rainfed Agricult
- Page 33 and 34:
422 A.K. Jain, M. Gopinath Reddy an
- Page 35 and 36: 424 A.K. Jain, M. Gopinath Reddy an
- Page 37 and 38: 426 A.K. Jain, M. Gopinath Reddy an
- Page 39 and 40: 428 A.K. Jain, M. Gopinath Reddy an
- Page 41 and 42: 430 A.K. Jain, M. Gopinath Reddy an
- Page 43 and 44: 432 A.K. Jain, M. Gopinath Reddy an
- Page 45 and 46: 434 S.Mohanakumar, R.VipinkumarIntr
- Page 47 and 48: 436 S.Mohanakumar, R.VipinkumarTabl
- Page 49 and 50: 438 S.Mohanakumar, R.VipinkumarTabl
- Page 51 and 52: 440 S.Mohanakumar, R.VipinkumarForm
- Page 53 and 54: 442 S.Mohanakumar, R.Vipinkumarmuch
- Page 55 and 56: 444 S.Mohanakumar, R.VipinkumarEsta
- Page 57 and 58: 446 S.Mohanakumar, R.VipinkumarTabl
- Page 59 and 60: 448 S.Mohanakumar, R.VipinkumarTabl
- Page 61 and 62: 450 S.Mohanakumar, R.VipinkumarRefe
- Page 63 and 64: 452 B.B. Malik and Jaya Shrivastava
- Page 65 and 66: 454 B.B. Malik and Jaya Shrivastava
- Page 67 and 68: 456 B.B. Malik and Jaya Shrivastava
- Page 69 and 70: 458 B.B. Malik and Jaya Shrivastava
- Page 71 and 72: Journal of Rural Development, Vol.
- Page 73 and 74: Levels of Living of Rural Household
- Page 75 and 76: Levels of Living of Rural Household
- Page 77 and 78: Levels of Living of Rural Household
- Page 79 and 80: Levels of Living of Rural Household
- Page 81 and 82: Levels of Living of Rural Household
- Page 83 and 84: Journal of Rural Development, Vol.
- Page 85: The Pattern of the Distribution of
- Page 89 and 90: The Pattern of the Distribution of
- Page 91 and 92: The Pattern of the Distribution of
- Page 93 and 94: The Pattern of the Distribution of
- Page 95 and 96: The Pattern of the Distribution of
- Page 97 and 98: Journal of Rural Development, Vol.
- Page 99 and 100: Structural, Functional and Situatio
- Page 101 and 102: Structural, Functional and Situatio
- Page 103 and 104: Structural, Functional and Situatio
- Page 105 and 106: Structural, Functional and Situatio
- Page 107 and 108: Structural, Functional and Situatio
- Page 109 and 110: Structural, Functional and Situatio
- Page 111 and 112: 502 Book ReviewsRole of Micro Finan
- Page 113 and 114: 504 Book ReviewsSardar Sarovar Proj