Te Puke Recreation and Aquatic Centre Feasibility Study

More documents

Recommendations

Info

16.0 FundingThe final capital costs associated with the proposed Te Puke aquatic and indoor recreation facility will dependon the final detail design and the facility components associated with this. The final key decisions on whetherthe pool is an indoor or outdoor pool, has a movable pool floor or not will all impact on the final cost of thefacility development.Key Considerations of the SectionThe estimated capital costs that have been identified for the potential options will be significant and a fundingplan will need to be developed and implemented if the required funds are to be raised.There will be some crucial funding organisations that will need to be engaged with early on in the planningprocess. The funding organisations are:• The Western Bay of Plenty District Council has provided seed funding of $450,000 towardspreliminary planning and capital development costs for the proposed development. It remainsunlikely that the aquatic facility or a larger two court recreation centre would be viable withoutadditional capital support from Council. Discussions with Council will be required to determine whatlevel of funding may be possible.• Another important potential funder if the project is to be successful could be the Tauranga CityCouncil. Discussions with the Council should be opened as soon as possible. It is likely that the Councilwould be most interested in the aquatic component of the project. Their support is likely to be heavilylinked to strategic planning associated with the growth of Papamoa East.• Another key funding organisation will be the Ministry of Education, which under current guidelinesallows for Te Puke High School to develop a new gymnasium space after 2012 (equivalent to 1.6basketball courts). The funding from the MoE should provide a solid start to raising the required fundsfor the indoor recreation centre component of the proposed development.• A potential key major funding organisation within the Western Bay of Plenty will be the TECT fundingtrust. They have contributed significant amounts to key sport and recreation facility projects in theWestern Bay of Plenty in recent years. It will be critical to demonstrate the role that the proposed TePuke aquatic and indoor recreation facility will play strategically in future discussions with TECT.• Other traditional funding organisations such as ‘NZ Lottery Grants’ and ‘NZCT’ will also be importantpotential funding streams to consider.Undertaking discussions with potential key funding organisations is a priority. It is important to understand thepotential funding that the project could realistically attract and within what time frames. The level of fundingwill be dependent on the role the facility is perceived to play. For example, an indoor pool could be seen aspart of a regional network, servicing the south of the region while ‘Bay Wave’ services the north.66
16.1 Historical Funding GrantsThe table below identifies the potential funding partners and their associated funding levels whichhave been granted historically.FundingOrganisationTECTPriority of Funding OrganisationMajor Amenities - $2,000,000 Annually• The emphasis of this Fund is to supportMajor Amenities that benefit the wholeTECT area, or a significant part of it.Community Amenities - $1,500,000 Annually• Funding within this category is tocontribute to Community Amenitieswithin the TECT District. An amenity mustbe of significant benefit to the communitywith funding directed towards apermanent new amenity or a significantupgrade of an existing amenity.Potential FundingExamples of past funding• $6m contribution to the TaurangaIndoor Sports and ExhibitionCentre• $4 million contribution to‘BayWave’• $2.5 million contribution for thepurchase and development of theTECT All Terrain Park in 2004. Afurther $1 million was approved in2007 towards the development ofan underpass to allow safe accessfrom the highway to both sides ofthe park.Examples of past funding• $225,000 helped to progress themuch anticipated Merivale ActionCentre which is situated on theSchool’s grounds• $200,000 contribution to OmanuBeach Surf Lifesaving Club forupgrade of the club house• $250,000 contribution towards TePuke Tennis Club court resurfaceCommunity Special Projects - $1,000,000Annually• Priority is given to applications that showlocal initiative and where the Grant willbenefit a significant part of ourCommunityNZ Lottery Grants • The New Zealand Lottery Grants Boardwas set up by Parliament to benefit thecommunity by distributing the profitsfrom the games run by NZ Lotteries.• The support arts, cultural, sporting andcommunity groups.• The Lottery Community Facilities Fund isfor projects to build or improvecommunity facilities that supportparticipation in community activities andExamples of past funding• Tauranga Volunteer Coastguard -grant of $250,000 towards a newrescue vessel.• Examples of past funding• Netball Waitakere Inc $750,000towards covering of four netballcourts and club room facilities• Waimakariri Covered PoolCommittee Inc $450,000• Mount Hutt Memorial Hall wasgranted $500,000 to refurbish thehall so it can provide the 49 user67
Page 2 and 3:
Purpose of the ReportThis report ha
Page 4 and 5:
Two options regarding the concept p
Page 6 and 7:
7.0 Network of Facilities .........
Page 8 and 9:
2.0 Population OverviewUnderstandin
Page 10 and 11:
Table 3: Census Areas Surrounding T
Page 12 and 13:
Te Puke East 0-14 Years 840 910 960
Page 14 and 15:
3.0 Growth StrategiesTo accommodate
Page 16 and 17: SmartGrowth Eastern CorridorThe Sma
Page 18 and 19: The Western Australian State Govern
Page 20 and 21: 4.7 Urban and Regional Regeneration
Page 22 and 23: 5.2 Key LearningsThe following sect
Page 24 and 25: - Revenue streams.- Operating model
Page 26 and 27: 5.2.10 Management Considerations•
Page 28 and 29: 6.1 Traditional Sports and Activiti
Page 30 and 31: • 68.8% were men and 31.2% were w
Page 32 and 33: 7.0 Network of FacilitiesThere are
Page 34 and 35: 7.2 Pool Facilities7.2.1 Existing S
Page 36 and 37: 7.3.2 Existing Other Indoor Recreat
Page 38 and 39: Waitakere City 186,444 1 - Indoor 5
Page 40 and 41: 9.1 Key Sports Clubs FeedbackStakeh
Page 42 and 43: well and board to provide a ‘cont
Page 44 and 45: SurroundingPrimarySchool’sUse the
Page 46 and 47: 6. The lack of existing or planned
Page 48 and 49: 11.0 Design BriefBased on the outco
Page 50 and 51: 11.1.2. Depth of Main Pool vs. Size
Page 52 and 53: 12.0 Schedule of SpacesThe findings
Page 54 and 55: 13.0 High Level Cost Estimates of t
Page 56 and 57: Potential Issues and Impacts when S
Page 58 and 59: 14.2 High Level Governance & Manage
Page 60 and 61: Base Option 3: Trust ModelTe Puke H
Page 62 and 63: 15.3 Income StreamsThe income strea
Page 64 and 65: Indoor Pool and Rec Centre - Projec
Page 68 and 69: NZCTsocial interaction, to foster c
Page 70 and 71: 17.0 ConclusionsSufficient need has
Page 74 and 75: Appendix 2 - Estimate of Costs Brea
Page 76 and 77: Te Puke Pool & Recreation CentreOrd
Page 78 and 79: Te Puke Pool & Recreation CentreOrd
Page 80 and 81: Appendix 4 - Preliminary Operationa
Page 82 and 83: Appendix 5 - Traffic Engineer’s L
Page 84 and 85: 2The first scenario is to provide r
Page 86: 4With the removal of one or more of
show all

Te Puke Recreation and Aquatic Centre Feasibility Study

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?