<strong>June</strong> <strong>2007</strong>KUWAIT MEDICAL JOURNAL 103I n d i c a t i o n s : C a n d i d a infections: intra-abdominalabscesses, peritonitis and pleural space infections,candidemia, esophageal candidiasis; invasiveaspergillosis in patients refractory or intolerant toother antifungal therapies; empiric therapy infebrile neutropenic patients.Dosage: Intravenous: adults: load 70 mg, then 50mg daily; children 50 mg/m2 daily; neonates: 1mg/kg daily X 2 doses then 2 mg/kg daily. (Note:more pediatric studies are required to determineoptimal doses).MICAFUNGINLike caspofungin, micafungin exhibits identicalspectrum of in vitro activity against C. albicans, nonal b i c a n s species and A s p e rg i l l u s species but notagainst zygomycetes and C. neoformans. It has fewerd ru g - d rug interactions and relatively lessexpensive than caspofungin [ 46 ] . It is eff i c a c i o u sagainst invasive candidiasis and asperg i l l o s i s .Although soluble in water, it has poor oralbioavailability. Its pharmacokinetics is similar inadults and children and metabolism is hepatic. Itreceived FDA a p p roval in March 2005 foresophageal candidiasis and for Candida infectionprophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantrecipients. Two clinical trials have been reported forthe treatment of invasive candidiasis withmicafungin (Table 3) [ 47 , 48 ] . In the first nonrandomized,non-comparative study, micafunginwas found safe and effective in the treatment ofrefractory and new cases of candidemia includingthose caused by C. glabrata with an overall successrate (complete and partial) of 83% [47] . In the secondmulticenter, open-label study, the clinical responsefor candidemia was 100% and for esophagealcandidiasis 71% [ 48 ] . Recently, de Wet et al [ 49 ]conducted a randomized, double blind studycomparing intravenous micafungin (150 mg/d)with intravenous fluconazole (200 mg/d) in thetreatment of esophageal candidiasis. Micafunginwas found to be as efficacious as intravenousfluconazole. In a randomized, double blind trialthat included adults and children with neutropenia,micafungin compared favorably with fluconazolein preventing invasive fungal infections afterhemopoietic stem cell transplantation (80% versus73.5% respectively; p = 0.03) [50] .Indications: Esophageal candidiasis, prophylaxisof Candida infections in patients undergoing stemcell transplantation.Dosage: Intravenous (Mycamine): Adults: Candidainfection prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem celltransplant patients: 50 mg/day over 1 h;esophageal candidiasis: 150 mg/day over 1 h.C h i l d ren: 3 mg/kg (more pediatric studies areneeded to determine optimal dose).ANIDULAFUNGINAnidulafungin (Eraxis) received FDA approvalfor treating candidemia in February 2006. The drugis active in vitro against most Candida spp withfungicidal activity, but like caspofungin, C .parapsilosis and C. guillermondii are more resistant tothis agent [51] . It is fungistatic against Aspergillus spp.and not active against C. neoformans or B .d e r m a t i t i d i s [ 52 ] . Although clinical experience islimited, anidulafungin is comparable tofluconazole in esophageal candidiasis [53] . At the endof randomized, double-blind study of 601 patientswith endoscopically and micro b i o l o g i c a l l ydocumented esophageal candidiasis, rate ofendoscopic success for anidulafungin was 97.2% ascompared to 98.8% in fluconazole group. This wasfound statistically non-inferior to that offluconazole [53] . In a phase 2, randomized, doserangingstudy evaluating the safety and efficacy ofanidulafungin in 123 invasive candidiasis andcandidemia patients, at the end of treatment, thesuccess rates were 84, 90, and 89% in the 50, 75 and100 mg groups, respectively (Table 3) [54] .Indications: Candidemia, esophageal candidiasis,abdominal abscesses, and peritonitis.Dosage: Intravenous: Candidemia: adult: load 200mg day 1, followed by a 100 mg daily dose, tocontinue for at least 14 days after last positiveculture; esophageal candidiasis: load 100 mg day 1,followed by a 50 mg daily dose, continue for at least14 days and for at least seven days followingresolution of symptoms. Doses in children are notyet established.COMBINATION THERAPYWith the availability of voriconazole, lipidformulations of amphotericin B, and echinocandins,the possibilities of using combination antifungalagents have greatly increased. The combination ofamphotericin B and 5-Flucytosine is wellestablished for the treatment of cryptococcalm e n i n g i t i s [ 12 ] . Initial combination studies usingazole antifungals and polyenes in animal modelsyielded synergistic, additive, indifferent or evenantagonistic re s u l t s [ 55 ] . A recently completedrandomized, blinded clinical trial in candidemiapatients suggested a trend towards impro v e doutcomes among non-neutropenic patientsreceiving amphotericin B (0.6-0.7 mg/kg) andfluconazole (800 mg/day) versus fluconazole (800mg/day) alone [ 56 , 57 ] . Results of this study
104Advances in Therapy of Invasive Mycoses <strong>June</strong> <strong>2007</strong>demonstrated a 69% success in favor ofcombination therapy (p = 0.043) over monotherapy(56%). However, success rates utilizing a Kaplan-Meier time -to- failure analysis was notsignificantly different (p = 0.08). The usefulness ofcombination of fluconazole with an echinocandinin Candida infections remains unclear.Currently, invasive aspergillosis is the focus ofcombination therapy in experimental and clinicals t u d i e s [ 58 , 59 ] . In a prospective, multicenter studycomprising patients of proven and pro b a b l einvasive aspergillosis, voriconazole andcaspogungin combination therapy was consideredpreferable to lipid formulation of amphotericin B ina subset of <strong>org</strong>an transplant recipients, such asthose with renal failure or A. fumigatus infection [60] .Adjunctive immunotherapies and immunereconstitutionwith a view to restoring orenhancing host defenses are other importantstrategies for the successful management of fungalinfection. Reduction of immunosuppression level,w h e re feasible, administration of re c o m b i n a n tcytokines and donor elicited granulocytetransfusion for neutropenic patients have beenused with encouraging results in experimental andclinical studies [61] . Recently, there have been studiesof adjunctive interferon and antibody therapy forcryptococcal meningitis [62] . More recently, Pachl etal [63] reported that an antibody fragment of heatshock protein 90 (Mycograb; manufactured byNeuTec Pharma, Manchester, UK) is effective in thetreatment of human candidiasis. In a double-blind,randomized study involving 117 culture confirmedpatients, a complete overall response was obtainedin 48% patients in the amphotericin B group ascompared to 84% in amphotericin B and Mycograbcombination group, reducing Candida attributablemortality to > four-fold. This molecule has directantifungal activity in vitro against C. albicans and C.neoformans through an unknown mechanism. Thisis a notable advance, giving a new direction to thefield of antimicrobial therapy.CONCLUSIONClinical mycology has entered into an era ofunprecedented therapeutic development. Optionsfor treatment of invasive fungal infections haveincreased with new agents that exhibit improvedtolerability and increased range of activity. Nowattention is being focused on examining the efficacyof these agents in combination with older or neweragents in randomized, controlled clinical studies. Itis hoped that with the availability of newtherapeutic alternatives, it will be possible todevelop effective strategies to prevent and treatthese life-threatening infections in the near future.REFERENCES1. Marr KA, Carter RA, Boeckh M, Martin P, Corey L. Invasiveaspergillosis in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients:changes in epidemiology and risk factors. Blood 2002;100:4358-4366.2. C h a y a k u l k e e ree M, Ghannoum MA, Perfect JR.Zygomycosis: the re-emerging fungal infection. Eur J ClinMicrobiol Infect Dis 2006; 25:215-219.3. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ. Rare and emerging opportunisticfungal pathogens: concern for resistance beyond Candidaalbicans and Aspergillus fumigatus. J Clin Microbiol 2004;42:4419-4431.4. Walsh TJ, Groll A, Hiemenz J, Fleming R, Roilides E,Anaissie E. Infections due to emerging and uncommonmedically important fungal pathogens. Clin Micro b i o lInfect 2004; 1:48-66.5. Buechner HA(ed.). Management of Fungus Diseases of theLung. C. Thomas. Springfield, 1971.6. Stevens DA, Kan VL, Judson MA, et al. Practice guidelinesfor diseases caused by Aspergillus. Clin Infect Dis 2000;30:696-709.7. Charlier C, Hart E, Lefort A, et al. Fluconazole for themanagement of invasive candidiasis: where do we standafter 15 years? J Antimicrob Chemother 2006; 57:384-410.8. Pappas PG, Rex JH, Sobel JD, et al. Guidelines for treatmentof candidiasis. Clin Infect Dis 2004a; 38:161-189.9. Maertens J, Boogaerts M. The place for itraconazole intreatment. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005; 56:i33-i38.10. Patterson TF. Advances and challenges in management ofinvasive mycoses. Lancet 2005; 366:1013-1025.11. O s t rosky-Zeichner L, Marr KA, Rex JH, Cohen SH.Amphotericin B: time for a new “gold standard”. Clin InfectDis 2003; 37:415-425.12. Saag MS, Graybill RJ, Larsen RA, et al. Practice guidelinesfor the management of cryptococcal disease. Clin Infect Dis2000; 30:710-718.13. Harbarth S, Burke JP, Lloyd JF, Evans RS, Pestotnik SL,S a m o re MH. Clinical and economic outcomes ofconventional amphotericin B-associated nephro t o x i c i t y.Clin Infect Dis 2002; 35:e120-127.14. Bates DW, Su L, Yu DT, et al. Mortality and costs of acuterenal failure associated with amphotericin B therapy. ClinInfect Dis 2001; 32:686-693.15. Wong-Beringer A, Jacobs RA, Guglielmo BJ. Lipidformulations of amphotericin B: clinical efficacy andtoxicities. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 27: 603-618.16. Ullmann AJ, Sanz MA, Tramarin A, et al. Prospective studyof amphotericin B formulations in immunocompromisedpatients in 4 European countries. Clin Infect Dis 2006;43:e29-38.17. Stevens DA. Azoles in the management of systemic fungalinfections. Infect Dis Clin Pract 2004; 12:81-92.18. Neeley MN, Ghannoum MA, The exciting future ofantifungal therapy. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2000;19:897-914.19. Jeu L, Piacenti FJ, Lyakhovetskiy AG, Fung HB.Voriconazole. Clin Ther 2003; 25:1321-1381.20. Kale P, Johnson LB. Second-generation azole antifungalagents. Drugs Today (Barc). 2005; 41:91-105.21. Perfect JR, Marr KA, Walsh TJ, et al. Voriconazole treatmentfor less-common, emerging, or refractory fungal infections.Clin Infect Dis 2003; 36:1122-31.22. Herbrecht R, Denning DW, Patterson TF, et al. Voriconazoleversus amphotericin B for primary therapy of invasiveaspergillosis. N Engl J Med 2002; 347:408-415.23. Denning DW, Ribaud P, Milpied N, et al. Efficacy and safetyof voriconazole in the treatment of acute invasive