3.1 DEVELOPING THE CRITICAL HABITAT APPROACHThe critical habitat approach has been adopted by various scientific bodies, governments andregional cetacean agreements, as a basis for identifying and protecting important habitat forcetaceans. As background information, a summary of this work follows below:North AmericaBoth Canada and the US have enshrined the term 'critical habitat' in their respective endangeredspecies legislation and over the past few years have begun the process of identifying such areasfor listed cetaceans. Although in both cases the term was used and defined for all species(terrestrial and marine), and not specifically cetaceans, these provide useful examples, showinghow the term is being applied and implemented for cetaceans.Canada's Species At Risk Act (SARA) (2002), defines critical habitat as:‘the habitat that is necessary for the survival or recovery of a listed wildlife species and thatis identified as the species' critical habitat in the recovery strategy or in an action plan forthe species’ 37 .Critical habitat has been identified for northern and southern resident killer whales in the coastalwaters of British Columbia 38 and incorporates areas known to be important foraging areas for thisspecies in the summer when salmon, the principal prey of resident killer whales, migrate throughthe area. The critical habitat area for the northern population was designated not just due to itsimportance as a feeding ground, but also because of the traditional use of 'rubbing beaches' in thearea – particular spots where the northern resident killer whales come to skim their bodies alongthe sand and pebbles on the sea floor.As the core summer habitat of these killer whales stretches into US waters, areas have also beendesignated as critical habitat south of the border under the US Endangered Species Act (ESA)(1973). This piece of legislation gives a more detailed definition of critical habitat and how it shouldbe interpreted. Critical habitat is defined as:‘the specific areas within the geographical area occupied by the species, at the time it islisted . . . on which are found those physical or biological features (I) essential to theconservation of the species and which may require special management considerations orprotection; and (II) specific areas outside the geographical area occupied by the species atthe time it is listed upon a determination by the Secretary to be essential for the conservationof the species.’ 39Further guidance is offered in determining whether an area meets this definition as the authoritiesare required to:‘consider those physical or biological features that are essential to the conservation of a givenspecies including space for individual and population growth and for normal behaviour; food,water, air, light, minerals, or other nutritional or physiological requirements; cover or shelter;sites for breeding, reproduction, and rearing of offspring; and habitats that are protected fromdisturbance or are representative of the historical, geographical and ecological distribution ofa species.’ 40These essential biological and physical features are known as 'primary constituent elements', orPCEs, and must be listed with the critical habitat description for a species. For southern residentkiller whales these PCEs were determined to be:(1) Water quality to support growth and development;(2) Prey species of sufficient quantity, quality and availability to support individual growth,reproduction and development, as well as overall population growth; and(3) Passage conditions to allow for migration, resting, and foraging 41 .To determine which specific areas in the region might contain these PCEs, a large sightingsdataset (mostly opportunistic) spanning 14 years was analysed. From this, three specific areaswere identified as containing the PCEs, based on presence and movements of the whales,behavioural observations and studies. In some cases where direct data on PCEs were unavailable,distribution patterns of the whales were used to infer presence of PCEs 42 .1437Species At Risk Act, 2002 Section 2(1)38Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 200939Endangered Species Act (1973), Section 34050 CFR 424.12(b)41NOAA, 200642NMFS, 2006
Foraging, travel, socialising and play are all activities noted to occur in the core areas but theprimary reasons for designation were feeding (two of the areas), and passage (one area).The resident killer whale example is rather unusual in that its summer core habitat is relativelyrestricted, predictable, coastal, and well studied, and therefore identifying critical habitat is aneasier process than for some other cetaceans 43 .Another example provided by the US is its designation of critical habitat for the highly endangeredNorth Pacific right whale, decidedly more challenging given the sparse data and relatively fewsightings. In this case, the only PCE known with certainty was the need for prey species (largezooplankton). It is thought that certain biological and physical features combine in some areas toproduce prey patches of sufficient density for the whales, but these forcing mechanisms are notcompletely understood. Also, due to the patchy nature of zooplankton density, there may be noobvious correlation between abundance and distribution of prey, and distribution of right whales.So in this situation where there was an absence of data describing presence and density of PCEs,sightings of right whales themselves were used as a proxy for their existence and thus to identifythe areas proposed for designation of critical habitat 44 .A further complicating factor is that survey effort has been inconsistent across the right whale'srange, and indeed, the area designated is where most research has taken place. However, theauthorities are required to designate critical habitat based on the 'best scientific data available',so even with these gaps in coverage, they are still able to put protective measures in place.The North Pacific right whale provides a valuable example of designating cetacean critical habitatin a data-poor situation, applying a precautionary approach.ACCOBAMSAs part of its programme of work on MPAs, ACCOBAMS 45 – Agreement on the Conservation ofCetaceans of the Black Sea, Mediterranean Sea and contiguous Atlantic area – adopted thedefinition of cetacean critical habitat as ‘a place or area regularly used by a cetacean group,population or species to perform tasks essential for survival and equilibrium maintenance’. 46ACCOBAMS has developed a suggested list of criteria to identify sites containing critical habitat:Areas used by cetaceans for feeding, breeding, calving, nursing and social behaviour;Migration routes and corridors and related resting areas;Areas where there are seasonal concentrations of cetacean species;Areas of importance to cetacean prey;Natural processes that support continued productivity of cetacean foraging species(upwellings, fronts, etc.);Topographic structures favourable for enhancing foraging opportunities for cetacean species(canyons, seamounts).These criteria are now being employed to identify critical habitat for cetaceans in the ACCOBAMSagreement area with the intention of establishing MPAs in the future. In 2006, ACCOBAMSScientific Committee recommended 18 critical habitat areas as candidates for MPAs and, in 2007,the Parties to ACCOBAMS accepted the recommendations in principle. Since then, two of theareas have been declared MPAs and several others are in the process of being approved.EU Habitats DirectiveAlthough the term 'critical habitat' is not used in the Habitats Directive 47 , there are similarities inapproach worth highlighting. In order to maintain or restore listed habitats and the habitat of listedspecies at a favourable conservation status, sites are to be proposed that present the 'physical orbiological factors essential to their life and reproduction'. Bottlenose dolphins and harbourporpoises are the two cetacean species listed on Annex II of the Habitats Directive. All cetaceansrequire ‘strict protection’ under Annex IV.43However, it should be noted that their whereabouts at other times of year remain less wellknown, so their wintercritical habitat remains undesignated44NOAA, 200845www.accobams.org46Hoyt, 2005a (2nd edition in prep. for 2011)47EC, 199215
- Page 1 and 2: WDCS, the Whale and Dolphin Conserv
- Page 3 and 4: Towards Marine ProtectedAreas for C
- Page 5 and 6: South west EnglandCeltic Deep - com
- Page 7 and 8: CONTENTSExecutive Summary 2Acknowle
- Page 9 and 10: 1. INTRODUCTIONWe enter an exciting
- Page 11 and 12: Note: This schematic map shows thev
- Page 13 and 14: 2. IDENTIFYING MARINE PROTECTED ARE
- Page 15: 3. CRITICAL HABITATInterest in the
- Page 19 and 20: 4. DATA AND SPECIES ACCOUNTSIn orde
- Page 21 and 22: Killer whale (Orcinus orca)Atlantic
- Page 23 and 24: 4.4 SPECIES ACCOUNTS4.4.1 HARBOUR P
- Page 25 and 26: Although there is some variation in
- Page 27 and 28: North ScotlandThe first SCANS surve
- Page 29 and 30: East EnglandThe seasonal pattern in
- Page 31 and 32: Irish SeaOutside of coastal Welsh w
- Page 33 and 34: 4.4.2 BOTTLENOSE DOLPHIN (Tursiops
- Page 35 and 36: This expansion in range means this
- Page 37 and 38: 4.4.3 SHORTBEAKED COMMON DOLPHIN (D
- Page 39 and 40: South west EnglandBased on observat
- Page 41 and 42: 4.4.4 COMMON MINKE WHALE (Balaenopt
- Page 43 and 44: Sightings for this area of the Oute
- Page 45 and 46: The JNCC Atlas of cetacean distribu
- Page 47 and 48: 4.4.5 WHITEBEAKED DOLPHIN (Lagenorh
- Page 49 and 50: 4.4.6 RISSO'S DOLPHIN (Grampus gris
- Page 51 and 52: 4.4.7 KILLER WHALE OR ORCA (Orcinus
- Page 53 and 54: 4.4.8 ATLANTIC WHITESIDED DOLPHIN (
- Page 55 and 56: 4.4.9 LONGFINNED PILOT WHALE (Globi
- Page 57 and 58: 4.4.10 SPERM WHALE (Physeter macroc
- Page 59 and 60: 4.4.11 BEAKED WHALESNORTHERN BOTTLE
- Page 61 and 62: which looked at worldwide beaked wh
- Page 63 and 64: There is no current population esti
- Page 65 and 66: 4.5 SCOTTISH MPA GUIDELINES - STAGE
- Page 67 and 68:
Northern bottlenose whale and Sower
- Page 69 and 70:
Fisheries BycatchFisheries bycatch
- Page 71 and 72:
5.2 AN OVERVIEW OF REGIONAL THREATS
- Page 73 and 74:
North ScotlandAs in the west, threa
- Page 75 and 76:
6. IDENTIFYING CRITICAL HABITAT IN
- Page 77 and 78:
6.1.1 HARBOUR PORPOISEWest and sout
- Page 79 and 80:
Assessment: Critical HabitatHigh re
- Page 81 and 82:
11. Area: Off Land's End, Cornwall
- Page 83 and 84:
Threats, status and relative import
- Page 85 and 86:
East Scotland3. Area: North east Sc
- Page 87 and 88:
Threats, status and relative import
- Page 89 and 90:
6.1.4 COMMON MINKE WHALEWest and so
- Page 91 and 92:
6.1.5 WHITEBEAKED DOLPHINWest and s
- Page 93 and 94:
Coastal Wales2. Area: Bardsey Islan
- Page 95 and 96:
6.1.8 ATLANTIC WHITESIDED DOLPHINNo
- Page 97 and 98:
Other areasOne other area was asses
- Page 99 and 100:
6.1.11 BEAKED WHALESThe northern Ro
- Page 101 and 102:
7. PROTECTING CRITICAL HABITAT - RE
- Page 103 and 104:
considered in the area, each of whi
- Page 105 and 106:
7.4 EAST SCOTLANDWithin the east Sc
- Page 107 and 108:
7.5 SOUTH WEST ENGLANDWithin the so
- Page 109 and 110:
An SAC is already in place for bott
- Page 111 and 112:
7.9 SUMMARYFour areas of identified
- Page 113 and 114:
iv. Licensing processes for industr
- Page 115 and 116:
9. IDENTIFICATION AND PRIORITISATIO
- Page 117 and 118:
Recommendations on particular data
- Page 119 and 120:
Coastal Wales northern Pembrokeshir
- Page 121 and 122:
ANNEX II SPECIES ACCOUNTS SUMMARY
- Page 123 and 124:
HARBOUR PORPOISEEast ScotlandStudyH
- Page 125 and 126:
HARBOUR PORPOISESouth West EnglandS
- Page 127 and 128:
HARBOUR PORPOISECoastal WalesStudyT
- Page 129 and 130:
BOTTLENOSE DOLPHINStudyTemporalReso
- Page 131 and 132:
SHORTBEAKED COMMON DOLPHINStudyTemp
- Page 133 and 134:
SHORTBEAKED COMMON DOLPHINStudyTemp
- Page 135 and 136:
COMMON MINKE WHALEWest ScotlandStud
- Page 137 and 138:
WHITEBEAKED DOLPHINStudyTemporalRes
- Page 139 and 140:
KILLER WHALEStudyTemporalResolution
- Page 141 and 142:
ATLANTIC WHITESIDED DOLPHINStudyTem
- Page 143 and 144:
SPERM WHALEStudyTemporalResolutionS
- Page 145 and 146:
BALEEN WHALESStudyTemporalResolutio
- Page 147 and 148:
ANNEX III THREATS TO CETACEANS - RE
- Page 149 and 150:
Actual orPotential ThreatActivitySp
- Page 151:
North ScotlandSpecies of most relev
- Page 156 and 157:
East EnglandSpecies of most relevan
- Page 158 and 159:
South East EnglandSpecies of most r
- Page 160 and 161:
South West EnglandSpecies of most r
- Page 162 and 163:
Irish SeaSpecies of most relevance
- Page 164 and 165:
Actual orPotential ThreatActivitySp
- Page 166 and 167:
Bravington, M., Borchers, D. and No
- Page 168 and 169:
Evans, P.G.H. and Anderwald, P. 200
- Page 170 and 171:
ICES WGMME. 2006. Report of the Wor
- Page 172 and 173:
ECS/ASCOBANS/ACCOBAMS Workshop held
- Page 174 and 175:
marine protected areas effective to
- Page 176:
ISBN: 9781901386233