The rebates, which consist in granting a lump sum discount to the ...

BIBLIOGRAFIACase C-52/09, Konkurrensverket vs. TeliaSonera Sverige AB, Judgment of the Court 17February 2011Case C-52/09, Konkurrensverket vs. TeliaSonera Sverige AB, opinion of Advocate General Mazák 2September 2010Case C-280/08 P, Deutsche Telekom AG vs. the Commission, Judgment of the Court 14October 2010Case COMP/C-1/37.451, 37.578, 37.579, Deutsche Telekom AG, [2003] OJ L263/9 Commissiondecision of 21 May 2003Case T-336/07, Telefónica and Telefónica de España v Commission, Action brought on 10September 2007Case T-398/07, Kingdom of Spain vs. Commission of the European Communities, Actionbrought on 31 October 2007Case COMP/38.784: Wanadoo España vs. Telefónica, Commission decision of 4 July 2007Case COMP/38.233, Wanadoo Interactive, Commission decision of 16 July 2003 Case T-201/04,Microsoft vs. the Commission, [2007] ECR II-3601, Judgment of the Court of First Instance 17September 2007Case No IV/35.151./E-I, Industrie des Poudres Sphériques vs. Péchiney electrométallurgie,Cases COMP/C-1/37.451, 37.578, 37.579, Deutsche Telekom AG, O.J. L 263/09 (2003).Case T-271/03 Deutsche Telekom AG vs Commission of the European Communities, para 166(2008)Commission decision 7 November 1996 Case C-7/97, Oscar Bronner GmbH & Co. KG vs.Mediaprint, [1998] ECR I-7791, Judgment of the Court of 26 November 1998Commission decision of 29 October 1975, National Coal Board, National Smokeless Fuels Limitedand National Carbonising Company Limited, O.J. L 35/6 (1976)Commission decision of 18 July 1988, Case IV/30.178, Napier Brown/British Sugar, O.J. L 284/41(1988)Pacific Bell Telephone Co v Linkline Communications Inc 129 S.Ct. 1109 (2009)Linkline Communications, Inc. v. SBC California, Inc., 503 F.3d 876 (9th Cir.) (2007)Verizon Communications Inc. V. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP - 540 U.S. 398 (2004)Geradin, “Refusal to supply and margin squeeze: A discussion of why the “Telefonica exceptions”are wrong” TILEC Discussion Paper41