13.07.2015 Views

The Norwegian Code of Practice for Corporate Governance - Statoil

The Norwegian Code of Practice for Corporate Governance - Statoil

The Norwegian Code of Practice for Corporate Governance - Statoil

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Changes to the <strong>Code</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> in October 2012<strong>The</strong> following amendments have been made:Section 1 ‘Implementation and reporting on corporate governance’<strong>The</strong> commentary to this Section now provides a more detailed explanation<strong>of</strong> the ‘comply or explain’ principle. <strong>The</strong> commentary clarifies that the <strong>Code</strong><strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> imposes more comprehensive requirements than the AccountingAct in respect <strong>of</strong> the in<strong>for</strong>mation that companies must provide.Section 4 ‘Equal treatment <strong>of</strong> shareholders and transactions with close associates’In accordance with the convention used in the <strong>Code</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> <strong>for</strong> the use<strong>of</strong> ‘should’ and ‘must’, the wording <strong>of</strong> this section has been amended so thata decision to waive pre-emption rights in the event <strong>of</strong> an increase in sharecapital ‘should’ be justified, and the stock exchange announcement <strong>of</strong> suchshare issues ‘should’ include the justification <strong>for</strong> this decision. This does notrepresent a material change.Section 7 ‘Nomination committee’<strong>The</strong> commentary to this Section now provides more guidance on whatshould be included in the nomination committee’s recommendations. Thisincludes clarification that the committee’s justification <strong>of</strong> its recommendationsshould address the criteria specified in Section 8 on the composition<strong>of</strong> the board <strong>of</strong> directors.Section 8 ‘<strong>Corporate</strong> assembly and board <strong>of</strong> directors: composition andindependence’This Section now makes it clear that the recommendation on the composition<strong>of</strong> the corporate assembly only applies to companies that have a corporateassembly. <strong>The</strong> commentary to this Section clarifies that not having acorporate assembly does not represent a deviation from the <strong>Code</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>.Section 10 ‘Risk management and internal control’<strong>The</strong> third paragraph <strong>of</strong> the recommendation, which relates to the reporton the main features <strong>of</strong> internal control etc., has been deleted since this isnow a requirement stipulated by the Accounting Act. <strong>The</strong> explanation inthe commentary to this Section on what the report should include has beenretained.11 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!