The Norwegian Code of Practice for Corporate Governance - Statoil
The Norwegian Code of Practice for Corporate Governance - Statoil
The Norwegian Code of Practice for Corporate Governance - Statoil
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Changes to the <strong>Code</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> in October 2012<strong>The</strong> following amendments have been made:Section 1 ‘Implementation and reporting on corporate governance’<strong>The</strong> commentary to this Section now provides a more detailed explanation<strong>of</strong> the ‘comply or explain’ principle. <strong>The</strong> commentary clarifies that the <strong>Code</strong><strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> imposes more comprehensive requirements than the AccountingAct in respect <strong>of</strong> the in<strong>for</strong>mation that companies must provide.Section 4 ‘Equal treatment <strong>of</strong> shareholders and transactions with close associates’In accordance with the convention used in the <strong>Code</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> <strong>for</strong> the use<strong>of</strong> ‘should’ and ‘must’, the wording <strong>of</strong> this section has been amended so thata decision to waive pre-emption rights in the event <strong>of</strong> an increase in sharecapital ‘should’ be justified, and the stock exchange announcement <strong>of</strong> suchshare issues ‘should’ include the justification <strong>for</strong> this decision. This does notrepresent a material change.Section 7 ‘Nomination committee’<strong>The</strong> commentary to this Section now provides more guidance on whatshould be included in the nomination committee’s recommendations. Thisincludes clarification that the committee’s justification <strong>of</strong> its recommendationsshould address the criteria specified in Section 8 on the composition<strong>of</strong> the board <strong>of</strong> directors.Section 8 ‘<strong>Corporate</strong> assembly and board <strong>of</strong> directors: composition andindependence’This Section now makes it clear that the recommendation on the composition<strong>of</strong> the corporate assembly only applies to companies that have a corporateassembly. <strong>The</strong> commentary to this Section clarifies that not having acorporate assembly does not represent a deviation from the <strong>Code</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>.Section 10 ‘Risk management and internal control’<strong>The</strong> third paragraph <strong>of</strong> the recommendation, which relates to the reporton the main features <strong>of</strong> internal control etc., has been deleted since this isnow a requirement stipulated by the Accounting Act. <strong>The</strong> explanation inthe commentary to this Section on what the report should include has beenretained.11 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE