13.07.2015 Views

The Norwegian Code of Practice for Corporate Governance - Statoil

The Norwegian Code of Practice for Corporate Governance - Statoil

The Norwegian Code of Practice for Corporate Governance - Statoil

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Per<strong>for</strong>mance-related remunerationPer<strong>for</strong>mance-related remuneration should not be such as might encouragea short-term approach that could be damaging to the company’s long-terminterests.Where a company's earnings or share price are heavily influenced by external<strong>for</strong>ces, the board <strong>of</strong> directors should consider using other <strong>for</strong>ms <strong>of</strong>incentive arrangement where the incentive can be linked to quantifiable targetsover which the executive personnel has a greater degree <strong>of</strong> influence.Great care should be taken when awarding options or similar benefits toexecutive personnel.<strong>The</strong> board <strong>of</strong> directors should ensure that simulations are carried out <strong>of</strong> theeffects <strong>of</strong> the structure <strong>of</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance-related remuneration as part <strong>of</strong> theevaluation <strong>of</strong> the possible outcome <strong>of</strong> the structure that is selected.Any share option schemes should be combined with direct ownership <strong>of</strong> theunderlying shares in order to make the interests <strong>of</strong> members <strong>of</strong> managementmore symmetrical with those <strong>of</strong> the company’s other shareholders. In orderto reduce the risk <strong>of</strong> an unrepresentative financial result, the dates <strong>of</strong> vesting,issue and exercise <strong>of</strong> options and other per<strong>for</strong>mance-based remunerationshould be spaced out over time, and any shares acquired through theexercise <strong>of</strong> options should be subject to a minimum period <strong>of</strong> ownership.Executive personnel should be encouraged to continue to hold a significantproportion <strong>of</strong> shares they receive beyond the expiry <strong>of</strong> the relevant lock-upperiods.<strong>The</strong> company should seek to ensure the right to demand the repayment <strong>of</strong>any per<strong>for</strong>mance-related remuneration that has been paid on the basis <strong>of</strong>facts that were self-evidently incorrect, or as the result <strong>of</strong> misleading in<strong>for</strong>mationsupplied by the individual in question.Reporting<strong>The</strong> company's report on corporate governance, cf. Section 1 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Code</strong><strong>of</strong> <strong>Practice</strong>, should provide an account <strong>of</strong> all aspects <strong>of</strong> the individualremuneration <strong>of</strong> the chief executive and other executive personnel, cf. therequirements set out in the Public Companies Act and the Accounting Act.Alternatively, the corporate governance report may make a clear reference tothe sections <strong>of</strong> the accounts where the statement on executive remunerationand in<strong>for</strong>mation on such remuneration is provided.49 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!