13.07.2015 Views

The Norwegian Code of Practice for Corporate Governance - Statoil

The Norwegian Code of Practice for Corporate Governance - Statoil

The Norwegian Code of Practice for Corporate Governance - Statoil

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> work <strong>of</strong> the nomination committee<strong>The</strong> chairman <strong>of</strong> the nomination committee has the overall responsibility<strong>for</strong> the work <strong>of</strong> the committee.<strong>The</strong> nomination committee should ensure that it has access to the expertiserequired in relation to the duties <strong>for</strong> which the committee is responsible.<strong>The</strong> nomination committee should have the ability to make use <strong>of</strong> resourcesavailable in the company or be able to seek advice and recommendationsfrom sources outside <strong>of</strong> the company.When reporting its recommendations to the general meeting, the nominationcommittee should also provide an account <strong>of</strong> how it has carried out itswork.<strong>The</strong> nomination committee is expected to monitor the need <strong>for</strong> any changesin the composition <strong>of</strong> the board <strong>of</strong> directors and to maintain contacts withshareholder groups, members <strong>of</strong> the corporate assembly and board andwith the company’s executive personnel. <strong>The</strong> nomination committee shouldpay particular attention to the board’s report on its own per<strong>for</strong>mance, cf.Section 9 on the work <strong>of</strong> the board.In carrying out its work, the nomination committee should actively seek torepresent the views <strong>of</strong> shareholders in general, and should ensure that itsrecommendations are endorsed by the largest shareholders.<strong>The</strong> committee’s recommendation should provide a justification <strong>of</strong> how itsrecommendations take into account the interests <strong>of</strong> shareholders in generaland the company’s requirements, cf. Section 8 on the composition <strong>of</strong> thecorporate assembly and board <strong>of</strong> directors.<strong>The</strong> justification should accordingly include in<strong>for</strong>mation on each candidate'scompetence, capacity and independence. In<strong>for</strong>mation on the candidatesshould include each individual's age, education and business experience.In<strong>for</strong>mation should be given on ownership interests in the company, and onany assignments carried out <strong>for</strong> the company, as well as on the individual'smaterial appointments with and assignments <strong>for</strong> other companies andorganisations. If the committee recommends the re-election <strong>of</strong> a member <strong>of</strong>the board <strong>of</strong> directors, the justification should also provide in<strong>for</strong>mation onhow long the candidate has been a member <strong>of</strong> the board <strong>of</strong> directors and hisor her record in respect <strong>of</strong> attendance at board meetings.29 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!