13.07.2015 Views

Volume 4 No 2 - Journal for the Study of Antisemitism

Volume 4 No 2 - Journal for the Study of Antisemitism

Volume 4 No 2 - Journal for the Study of Antisemitism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2012] HUNGARY: ANTISEMITIC PREJUDICE 451TABLE 4CONTENT OF ANTISEMITISM IIAgrees withat least one <strong>of</strong>Agrees with both <strong>the</strong> Agrees only Agrees onlyall <strong>the</strong> political and with <strong>the</strong> with <strong>the</strong>political and <strong>the</strong> political discriminative Agrees withdiscriminative discriminative statements statements none <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>statements statements (one or two <strong>of</strong> (one or two <strong>of</strong> statements(%) (%) <strong>the</strong>m) (%) <strong>the</strong>m) (%) (%)2006 2011 2006 2011 2006 2011 2006 2011 2006 20117 9 19 21 26 22 7 7 48 50As <strong>the</strong> results show, <strong>the</strong> percentage <strong>of</strong> non-antisemites remained essentiallyunchanged, but <strong>the</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> group agreeing with antisemiticviews altered. The proportion <strong>of</strong> respondents agreeing only with <strong>the</strong> discriminativestatements did not change, but <strong>the</strong> propensity to discriminateincreased among <strong>the</strong> political antisemites. Accordingly, <strong>the</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong>respondents agreeing only with <strong>the</strong> political statements decreased slightly.A greater propensity to discriminate among <strong>the</strong> political antisemites mayindicate an increase in <strong>the</strong> mobilization potential <strong>of</strong> antisemitism over <strong>the</strong>past five years—i.e., that is to say, among those who already show support<strong>for</strong> anti-Jewish views, <strong>the</strong> propensity to accept antisemitic politicaldemands is greater now than it was five years ago.Already at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 2002 survey we found that discriminativeantisemitism was more common among groups <strong>of</strong> lower social status andthat political antisemitism was more common among groups <strong>of</strong> highersocial status (Kovács, 2010, pp. 114-121). The findings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 2011 studywere similar: respondents agreeing only with <strong>the</strong> discriminative antisemiticstatements were more likely than average to be rural dwellers, male, unemployed,and to have no more than elementary schooling. Meanwhile,respondents agreeing only with <strong>the</strong> political antisemitic statements weresignificantly more likely than average to live in Budapest or ano<strong>the</strong>r urbanarea and to have a university education and a higher-paying, white-collarjob. The data <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> current study also confirm <strong>the</strong> finding <strong>of</strong> previousresearch that political antisemitism by itself is not necessarily closely linkedto a personal antipathy <strong>for</strong> Jews. As Table 5 shows, among respondentswho are exclusively political antisemites, <strong>the</strong> emotional rejection <strong>of</strong> Jews isnot much stronger than <strong>the</strong> average <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> whole population. Moreover,<strong>the</strong>se antisemites are less hostile to Jews than <strong>the</strong>y are to all o<strong>the</strong>r ethnicgroups in Hungary listed on <strong>the</strong> questionnaire, with <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Germans. (It should be noted that even <strong>the</strong> hard core <strong>of</strong> antisemites—<strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!