13.07.2015 Views

Volume 4 No 2 - Journal for the Study of Antisemitism

Volume 4 No 2 - Journal for the Study of Antisemitism

Volume 4 No 2 - Journal for the Study of Antisemitism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

818 JOURNAL FOR THE STUDY OF ANTISEMITISM [ VOL. 4:817attack against Jews in general, but as against a type <strong>of</strong> person “distinguishedby <strong>the</strong>ir political views.”Later examples <strong>of</strong> Dieudonné’s intent were not judged so lightly. Hehas been sued in France <strong>for</strong> “apology <strong>for</strong> crimes against humanity,” “provocationto discrimination, hate and violence” and “bringing injury to a group<strong>of</strong> persons under <strong>the</strong> cover <strong>of</strong> humour.”Ano<strong>the</strong>r court judgment argued that Dieudonné’s object was to <strong>of</strong>fend<strong>the</strong> memory <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Jewish people, in “turning <strong>the</strong> deportation and extermination<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Jews by <strong>the</strong> Nazis in <strong>the</strong> Second World War into a derisionthat constitutes an outrageous and contemptuous expression regarding <strong>the</strong>Jewish community.”As co-founder <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> French “Anti-Zionist Party,” Dieudonné campaignedin regional elections and, as a candidate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> “Euro-Palestineparty” in <strong>the</strong> European elections, on a plat<strong>for</strong>m to combat “Zionist dominationin Western societies” and “submission to <strong>the</strong> Shoah, which has becomea new religion.”Without giving undue importance to Dieudonné’s latest film, <strong>the</strong> 90-minute, tedious L’antisémite proves two arguments: a) that Judeophobia,anti-Zionism, Holocaust denial, and Protocols conspiracy <strong>the</strong>ories are notstand-alone ideologies that may or may not contain elements <strong>of</strong> antisemitism.Indeed, <strong>the</strong>y are <strong>the</strong> building blocks <strong>of</strong> antisemitism itself, and b) thatantisemitism is a self-destructive disease that is contagious and, at a certainpoint, becomes incurable.The film opens in black and white, where Dieudonné, as a US marine,is “discovering” Auschwitz and feeding a morsel <strong>of</strong> bread through <strong>the</strong>barbed wire to an emaciated inmate, who takes him on a tour <strong>of</strong> a “gaschamber” with bathroom-type hand showers. The human bone fragments in<strong>the</strong> crematoria are presented as if <strong>the</strong>y were <strong>the</strong> remains <strong>of</strong> a barbecue.Dieudonné physically abuses <strong>the</strong> cast, his wife, his psychoanalyst (Dr.Goldstein), and his homosexual film director—<strong>for</strong> all are Jews, thus justifyinghis antisemitic paranoia. The bottom line is: “The Jews control everything;media, finance, politics—we have no choice, we must exterminate<strong>the</strong>m!” Filmed within a film in <strong>the</strong> Main d’Or <strong>the</strong>ater, it ends with a madparty <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> audience dancing with <strong>the</strong> so called “Shoahnanas” (Shoahgirls).The film—available only online—has been ostracized by cinemachains and television channels can only be purchased online. The sleeveclaims an award nomination at <strong>the</strong> Fajr-Tehran film festival; indeed, LeMonde reported that <strong>the</strong> movie was co-produced with Iran.Cannes film market director Jerome Poullard rejected a public screening,as would be <strong>the</strong> case “<strong>for</strong> any movie that affects public order and relig-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!