13.07.2015 Views

Volume 4 No 2 - Journal for the Study of Antisemitism

Volume 4 No 2 - Journal for the Study of Antisemitism

Volume 4 No 2 - Journal for the Study of Antisemitism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

706 JOURNAL FOR THE STUDY OF ANTISEMITISM [ VOL. 4:679unsavory background, it is felt that his letter should not beacknowledged.” 125Brasol’s last communication with <strong>the</strong> bureau, ano<strong>the</strong>r letter addressedto Hoover, arrived in September 1960. Its contents were an anti-Khrushchev flyer put out by <strong>the</strong> Monarchist Front and an anti-communistbroadside reprinted from a Russian paper in Buenos Aires. This, too, elicitedno comment. On March 19, 1963, Boris Brasol’s angry voice and busyhands were stilled <strong>for</strong>ever.So, what is one to make <strong>of</strong> Boris Brasol and his almost half century <strong>of</strong>resourceful, unrepentant Jew-baiting? In one respect, he is a kind <strong>of</strong> humanembodiment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> resiliency <strong>of</strong> antisemitic sentiment and myths. Likethose malevolent strains, he transcended limitation to any particular time orplace. His career connects <strong>the</strong> antisemitism <strong>of</strong> pre-revolutionary Russiawith that <strong>of</strong> 20th-century America and Western Europe, Weimar and NaziGermany, and perhaps even Stalin’s USSR. He can be seen as a centralfigure in what might be called an “Antisemitic International” that schemedand fulminated throughout <strong>the</strong> first half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> century, and doubtless stilldoes. At <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> sounding sacrilegious, if antisemitism was a Church,Brasol surely would merit sainthood. All that said, <strong>the</strong> above does not dototal justice to <strong>the</strong> man. For reasons <strong>of</strong> focus and brevity, his literary ef<strong>for</strong>tshave been largely ignored, nor have his myriad contacts been mapped out to<strong>the</strong>ir full extent. That requires a more in-depth study.Perhaps <strong>the</strong> last words about him, though, an epitaph <strong>of</strong> sorts, shouldgo to one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ADL in<strong>for</strong>mants: “Brasol is a crafty man. You feel this inyour conversation with him. He is very careful about how he words hissentences and <strong>the</strong>re is always <strong>the</strong> feeling <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cat and mouse.” 126*Richard B. Spence has been a pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> history at <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Idaho since1986, and past department chair. Focusing on Russian, Eastern European, and MiddleEastern history, espionage, antisemitism, and <strong>the</strong> Holocaust, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Spencehas published numerous articles and books, including Boris Savinkov (ColumbiaUniversity Press, 1991), Trust <strong>No</strong> One (Feral House, 2002), and Secret Agent 666(Feral House, 2008). He has been a consultant to <strong>the</strong> History Channel, <strong>the</strong> InternationalSpy Museum, Radio Liberty, and <strong>the</strong> Russian Cultural Foundation.125. Jones to Gordon A. Nease, July 17, 1958, ibid.126. ADL, report <strong>of</strong> December 5, 1941, 4.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!