13.07.2015 Views

Do the right thing, Adviser's and creditors experience of best practice ...

Do the right thing, Adviser's and creditors experience of best practice ...

Do the right thing, Adviser's and creditors experience of best practice ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ReviewsIt is only reasonable that a person in debt shouldbe willing to review <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>of</strong>fer. However, askingpeople in debt to review <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>of</strong>fer every one,two or three months wastes advisers’ <strong>and</strong> <strong>creditors</strong>’time. It is unlikely that <strong>the</strong> person’s situation willhave improved in such a short time period; <strong>and</strong>carrying out a review could involve <strong>the</strong> adviserre-interviewing <strong>the</strong> person <strong>and</strong> sending evenmore letters to <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>creditors</strong> – all <strong>of</strong> which costsmoney <strong>and</strong> takes time. Instead <strong>creditors</strong> shouldonly expect reviews to be carried out annually, orwhen a person’s situation changes for better orworse, as M&S Money does.Creditors should not insist that an advice agencycarries out <strong>the</strong> review. If a person has maintainedpayments <strong>and</strong> is willing <strong>and</strong> able to engage with<strong>the</strong>ir <strong>creditors</strong>, <strong>the</strong>y should be allowed to submit<strong>the</strong>ir own revised <strong>of</strong>fer.Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>creditors</strong> should not expect <strong>the</strong>person’s <strong>of</strong>fer to increase just because time haspassed. Or that <strong>the</strong>y can press for higher paymentsif <strong>the</strong> person is no longer represented by an adviceagency. Instead <strong>creditors</strong> should approach reviewsin a pragmatic way: if <strong>the</strong> person needs extra help,<strong>the</strong>y should be given time to seek it; if <strong>the</strong> personis able to submit <strong>the</strong>ir own <strong>of</strong>fer, <strong>the</strong>y should beallowed to do so. No matter who submits <strong>the</strong>revised <strong>of</strong>fer, <strong>creditors</strong> should still use an objectiveway <strong>of</strong> assessing how much <strong>the</strong> person can pay –like <strong>the</strong> CFS. Library photos posed by models: John Birdsall/Press Association15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!