Publikační činnost - Mendelova zemědělská a lesnická univerzita v ...

nesouvisí s testovanými hnojivy, vzhledem k zanedbatelnému obsahu tohoto prvku v použitých hnojivech. Rozdílyv koncentracích Mg v rostlinném materiálu nebyly v průběhu pokusu zjištěny. Hodnota pH v průběhu 3 let pokleslau variant s MKM o 0,1 – 0,3, i přes nezanedbatelný obsah Ca v těchto MKM. Obsahy přístupných živin v půdě sepo aplikaci MKM průkazně změnily v případě P pouze v Lípě (o 19 – 33 mg/kg), naproti tomu v Jaroměřicích obsahP zůstal bez průkazných změn. U Ca, Mg nebyly v průběhu pokusu zaznamenány průkazné rozdíly jejich obsahův půdě. Dusík byl rostlinám přístupný brzy po aplikaci, což se projevilo srovnatelným obsahem Nmin s ostatními(i minerálně hnojenými) variantami. I přes omezenou produkci se masokostní moučky jeví jako vhodné alternativníorganické hnojivo použitelné pro hnojení polních plodin.TRNKA, M. – BARTOŠOVÁ, L. – SCHAUMBERGER, A. – RUGET, F. – EITZINGER, J. – FORMAYER, H. – SEGUIN, B.– OLESEN, J. E. Climate change and impact on European grasslands. In: Grassland Science in Europe.1. vyd. Irdning: Agricultural Research and Education Centre Raumberg-Gumpenstein, 2011. s. 39–51. ISBN978-3-902559-65-4.Hay meadows are of high importance for European agriculture in temperate and humid regions and occupy a largeproportion of the landscape (13.2% of the total area or 568 042 km2 within the EU 27) (EUROSTAT 2010). Permanentgrasslands are defined in the EU as agricultural surfaces that are under land use for several, usually morethan five, consecutive years and are covered by herbaceous forage crops, either naturally (through self-seeding) orthrough cultivation (sowing). They are not included in the crop rotation scheme on the agricultural holding andcan be either managed as pastures with grazing livestock or through mowing for hay and silage. Such grasslandsare dominated usually by only a few key species (Beierkuhnlein et al., 2011). Proportion and acreage of agricultureland used as grasslands however varies greatly over the EU depending primarily on the climate and soil conditionsof the given region. Distribution of grassland areas over various climates is documented by Table 1 that contains estimatesof landuse patterns throughout the 12 distinct Environmental zones over Europe (Figure 1a) as defined byMetzger et al. (2005). Table 1 also documents that the regions where grasslands are most productive, they are notdominating type of land use in the agricultural landscape as other types of agriculture activity is more profitable. Itis also obvious that effect of climate change on grasslands will be region dependent and will also greatly vary withthe character of change. While increased precipitation and temperature (and thus growing season length) togetherwith higher CO2 content will likely lead to higher yields the opposite trends are expected for Mediterranean areaand increased variability for “in between” regions as e.g. Central Europe. The presented contribution at first analyzesagroclimatic limitations of grassland production over 12 Environmental zones and then discusses four areasin which grasslands could be affected by climate change i) changes in the grassland phenology; ii) changes in thegrassland yield; iii) changes in the composition and iv) potential effect of extreme events (mainly drought). Thenit focuses on the changes of agroclimatic conditions for grasslands on the European level and effect of expectedclimate change in two selected regions of Austria and France.MAŠÍČEK, T. – TOMAN, F. – VIČANOVÁ, M. – HUBAČÍKOVÁ, V. Evaluation of the Infiltration Capacity of Soil ina Winter Wheat Stand During the Growing Season 2010. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et SilviculturaeMendelianae Brunensis. 2011. sv. LIX, č. 6, s. 225–233. ISSN 1211-8516.The aim of the presented paper was to map the course of infiltration during the growing season of 2010 in a winterwheat stand on a selected locality in the Sazomín cadastral area on the basis of selected hydro-physical propertiesof soil (specific weight, reduced volume weight, actual soil moisture, absorptivity, retention water capacity, porosity,capillary, semi-capillary and non-capillary pores and aeration) evaluated from the analyses of undisturbed soilsamples. In order to assess the infiltration capacity of soil at the U Jasana locality in the season April–October,four surveys were realized always with three measurements within each of the surveys. The measurement of infiltrationtook place in the form of basin irrigation. To evaluate field measurements of infiltration empirical relationswere used, namely Kostiakov equations. The highest cumulative infiltration and speed of infiltration were noted inJune at the high actual soil moisture and closed stand. In case of October measurement, effects of agro-technicaloperations became evident on the slightly lower infiltration capacity of soil as compared to June measurementsat nearly identical moisture conditions. The lowest infiltration capacity of soil reaching the same level, namely inspite of different moisture conditions and the stand character (July – full-grown stand, August – stubble-field) wasfound in July and August.DRÁPAL, K. – JANEČKA, L. – ELZNER, P. – JŮZL, M. Zhodnocení výnosových charakteristik u vybraných odrůdbrambor na polní pokusné stanici v Žabčicích v letecch 2009-2010. In CERKAL, R. – HRSTKOVÁ, P. Sborníkodborných příspěvků a sdělení ”MendelAgro 2011”. Brno: Mendelova univerzita v Brně, 2011, s. 28–31.ISBN 978-80-7375-516-4.Cílém této práce bylo zjištění vlivu odrůdy a ročníku na vybrané výnosotvorné prvky brambor. Konkrétně se jednaloo hektarový výnos a počet hlíz pod trsem. Pokus byl založen v letech 2009 a 2010 na pokusné stanici v Žabčicích14