1 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.0 Chapter ... - DSpace@UM

More documents

Recommendations

Info

4.6.1 H1: There is a positive association between general fairness and taxcompliance behaviour in MalaysiaTable 4.9 is a summary of Regression Model 1 and the output for H1. The model wassignificant at p
from a public good which was funded by the taxes that the government collected. On theother hand, if the perceived inequity is to his advantage, guilt feeling will reduce hisevasion.Table 4.9: Results Of Regression Analysis: Model 1, 2, 3a and 3bVariables R 2 Adj R 2 F Sig. F Beta VIF Tolt-valueSig.*Model 1 0.117 0.110 17.08 0.000Constant 2.87E-0.18 1.000GenFairness D 1 0.125 1.014 0.986 2.599 0.010**Tstructure D 2 0.071 1.052 0.951 1.456 0.146SelfInt D 3 -0.322 1.037 0.964 -6.616 0.000**Model 2 0.133 0.117 8.371 0.000Constant -0.778 0.020GenFairness D 1 0.134 1.052 0.951 2.739 0.006**Tstructure D 2 0.063 1.069 0.935 1.276 0.203SelfInt D 3 -0.308 1.089 0.918 -6.187 0.000**Gender 0.044 1.053 0.950 0.446 0.656Age 0.095 1.028 0972 1.693 0.091Education 0.091 1.103 0.906 1.941 0.053Employment 0.054 1.119 0,894 0.987 0.324Model 3 a Older 0.128 0.113 8.045 0.000Constant 0.510 0.069GenFairness D 1 0. 137 1.050 0.953 2.800 0.005**Tstructure D 2 0.064 1.073 0.932 1.296 0.196SelfInt D 3 -0.312 1.086 0.921 -6.258 0.000**Gender 0.038 1.052 0.951 0.384 0.701Education 0.092 1.112 0.899 1.946 0.052*Employment 0.059 1.115 0.897 1.079 0.281Age –Older 0.091 1.037 0.964 0.932 0.35Model 3 b F/Male 0.133 0.117 8.371 0.000Constant -0.735 0.011GenFairness D 1 0.134 1.052 0.951 2.739 0.006**Tstructure D 2 0.063 1.069 0.935 1.276 0.203SelfInt D 3 -0.308 1.089 0.918 -6.187 0.000**Female 0.044 1.053 0.950 0.446 0.656Age 0.095 1.028 0.972 1.693 0.091Education 0.091 1.103 0.906 1.941 0.053Employment 0.054 1.119 0.894 0.987 0.324a) Level of significance ; **p
Page 4:
noncompliance which means not repor
Page 10 and 11:
individuals that push for tax fairn
Page 12 and 13:
Following from hypothesis H1 - H5,
Page 14 and 15:
1.6 Limitations of the StudyThe fin
Page 16 and 17:
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW2.0 Cha
Page 18 and 19:
compliance research and numerous ta
Page 20 and 21: stated crime is an industry where m
Page 22 and 23: 2.2 Definition of Tax FairnessThe l
Page 24 and 25: Distribution in tax fairness refers
Page 26 and 27: elief, and evaluation between pragm
Page 28 and 29: elief that unfairness in the tax sy
Page 30 and 31: elevance of knowing the attitudes o
Page 32 and 33: It has been admitted by many resear
Page 34 and 35: significant results. The reasons gi
Page 36: unfair and also their exchange with
Page 39 and 40: (vertical equity) or in other words
Page 41 and 42: Jackson & Milliron (1986) found tha
Page 43 and 44: differences. Therefore the findings
Page 45 and 46: study education which is a noncompl
Page 47 and 48: CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY3.0 Chapter O
Page 49 and 50: Table 3.1: Reversed Coded Items on
Page 51 and 52: 3.2 Sampling DesignA non probabilit
Page 53 and 54: correlations and multiple regressio
Page 55 and 56: the four Federal Territory IRB bran
Page 57 and 58: analysis was carried out. Firstly,
Page 59 and 60: Table 4.3: Mean and Standard Deviat
Page 61 and 62: factor analysis was considered appr
Page 63 and 64: paid is fair to himself). Based on
Page 65 and 66: dependent variables but having the
Page 68 and 69: 4.5.2 Correlation Matrix 2 between
Page 72 and 73: The second predictor which was sign
Page 74 and 75: analyzed in Model 3a and 3b to know
Page 76 and 77: Model 3a band 3b was specifically t
Page 78 and 79: CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMEN
Page 80 and 81: taxes they pay, and may not be payi
Page 82 and 83: in the pay statements and they have
Page 84 and 85: service announcements such as, tele
Page 86 and 87: BIBLIOGRAPHYAllingham, M., & Sandmo
Page 88 and 89: Fallan, L. (1999), “Gender, expos
Page 90 and 91: Mazur, M. .J. & Plumley. A. (2007),
Page 92 and 93: Singh, V. (2003), “Tax Compliance
show all

1 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.0 Chapter ... - DSpace@UM

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?