Fallan, L. (1999), “Gender, exposure to tax knowledge, and attitudes towards taxation: anExperiments Approach”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol 18 No. 2. pp. 173-183Feld, L.P. & Frey. B.S. (2007), “Tax Compliance as the Result of a Psychological TaxContract: The Role of Incentives and Response Regulation”, Law and policy, Vol 29No.1, pp 102-120Feinstein, J.S. (1991), “Econometric Analysis of Income Tax Evasion and its Detection”,Journal of Economics, Vol 22 No. 1, pp. 14-35Fleischman, G.M., Valentine,S., & Finn, D.W. (2007),”Ethical Reasoning and EquitableRelief”, Behavioural Research in Accounting, Vol 19,pp 107-132Gilligan, G., & Richardson, G. (2005), “Perceptions of Tax Fairness and Tax Compliancein Australia and Hong Kong – A Preliminary Study”, Journal of Financial Crime, Vol 12No. 4, pp. 331-342Gerbing, M.D. (1988), “An empirical study of taxpayer perceptions of fairness”Unpublished PhD Thesis, The University of Texas at AustinGerxhani,K. (2007).”Explaining Gender differences In Tax Evasion: The case of Tirana,Albania, Feminist Economics, Vol 12 No.2 ,pp. 119-155Haniffa, H. M. M. (1996), “An Evaluation of the Malaysian Tax Administrative System,and Taxpayers’ Perceptions towards Assessment Systems, Tax Law Fairness and TaxLaw Complexity”, PhD Thesis, Universiti Utara MalaysiaHite ,P.A & Roberts,M.L. (1991), “ An Empirical Investigations of Taxpayer Judgmentson Rate Structure and the Individual Income Tax System”, The Journal of the AmericanTaxation Association”, Vol 13 No. 2, pp. 47-6388
Hite, P.A., & Roberts, M.L. (1992), “An Analysis of Tax Reform Based On Taxpayers’Perceptions of Fairness and Self-Interest”, Advances in Taxation, Vol 4, pp. 115-137Hofstede's Framework for Assessing Culturehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_distance#Power_distance accessed on 13/04/2008Jackson, B.R., & Milliron V.C. (1986), “Tax compliance research, findings and problemsand prospects”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol 5 , pp. 125-165James, S., & Alley, C. (1999), “Tax Compliance, Self- Assessment and TaxAdministration”, Journal of Finance and Management in Public Services, Vol 2 , No. 2James, S. S. 2007, “Essay on Tax Policy and Tax Compliance”, Dissertation, HarvardUniversityJoseph, A. P, (1986), “The rich, the poor and the taxes they pay”, Wheatsheaf Books Ltd,Sussex, EnglandKaplan, S. E., & Reckers, P.M.J.,(1985), “A Study of Tax evasion Judgments”, NationalTax Journal, Vol 38 No.1, pp. 97-102Kassipillai, J. (1996), “Taxpayer’s Understanding and Knowledge Index (TUKI) as aClue to Non- Compliance, Ph.D. Thesis, AustraliaKim, C.K. (2002), “Does fairness matter in tax reporting behavior”? Journal ofPsychology, Vol 23, pp. 771 – 785Mason, R., & Lowry, H. (1981). An estimate of income tax evasion in Oregon. Corvallis:Survey Research Centre, Oregon State UniversityMason, R., & L.D. Calvin (1984), “Public Confidence and Admitted Tax Evasion”National Tax Journal, Vol 37 No. 4, pp. 489-49689
- Page 4:
noncompliance which means not repor
- Page 10 and 11:
individuals that push for tax fairn
- Page 12 and 13:
Following from hypothesis H1 - H5,
- Page 14 and 15:
1.6 Limitations of the StudyThe fin
- Page 16 and 17:
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW2.0 Cha
- Page 18 and 19:
compliance research and numerous ta
- Page 20 and 21:
stated crime is an industry where m
- Page 22 and 23:
2.2 Definition of Tax FairnessThe l
- Page 24 and 25:
Distribution in tax fairness refers
- Page 26 and 27:
elief, and evaluation between pragm
- Page 28 and 29:
elief that unfairness in the tax sy
- Page 30 and 31:
elevance of knowing the attitudes o
- Page 32 and 33:
It has been admitted by many resear
- Page 34 and 35:
significant results. The reasons gi
- Page 36:
unfair and also their exchange with
- Page 39 and 40: (vertical equity) or in other words
- Page 41 and 42: Jackson & Milliron (1986) found tha
- Page 43 and 44: differences. Therefore the findings
- Page 45 and 46: study education which is a noncompl
- Page 47 and 48: CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY3.0 Chapter O
- Page 49 and 50: Table 3.1: Reversed Coded Items on
- Page 51 and 52: 3.2 Sampling DesignA non probabilit
- Page 53 and 54: correlations and multiple regressio
- Page 55 and 56: the four Federal Territory IRB bran
- Page 57 and 58: analysis was carried out. Firstly,
- Page 59 and 60: Table 4.3: Mean and Standard Deviat
- Page 61 and 62: factor analysis was considered appr
- Page 63 and 64: paid is fair to himself). Based on
- Page 65 and 66: dependent variables but having the
- Page 68 and 69: 4.5.2 Correlation Matrix 2 between
- Page 70 and 71: 4.6.1 H1: There is a positive assoc
- Page 72 and 73: The second predictor which was sign
- Page 74 and 75: analyzed in Model 3a and 3b to know
- Page 76 and 77: Model 3a band 3b was specifically t
- Page 78 and 79: CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMEN
- Page 80 and 81: taxes they pay, and may not be payi
- Page 82 and 83: in the pay statements and they have
- Page 84 and 85: service announcements such as, tele
- Page 86 and 87: BIBLIOGRAPHYAllingham, M., & Sandmo
- Page 90 and 91: Mazur, M. .J. & Plumley. A. (2007),
- Page 92 and 93: Singh, V. (2003), “Tax Compliance