13.07.2015 Views

Paving the Way for Climate-Resilient Infrastructure - UN CC:Learn

Paving the Way for Climate-Resilient Infrastructure - UN CC:Learn

Paving the Way for Climate-Resilient Infrastructure - UN CC:Learn

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PART IChapter 4: A ‘No-Regrets’ Risk-Based Approach to <strong>Climate</strong> Proofing Public <strong>Infrastructure</strong>Vulnerability Assessment: There are many aspects of vulnerability, arising from various physical, social,economic, and environmental factors. Examples may include poor design and construction of buildings,inadequate protection of assets, lack of public in<strong>for</strong>mation and awareness, limited official recognition ofrisks and preparedness measures, and disregard <strong>for</strong> wise environmental management. Vulnerability variessignificantly within a community and over time. Vulnerability broadly includes exposure and sensitivity ofassets and livelihoods, which can be changed by policy makers and planners.Capacity Assessment: Policies and institutional structure and context are major factors <strong>for</strong> increasingresilience. Clearly, capacity can be influenced by policy makers and planners, and by o<strong>the</strong>r investments.Capacity includes technical competence of individuals and <strong>the</strong> functioning of institutions individually andin tandem, and it also includes inter-institutional dynamics, functioning of markets (including differentfinancial and insurance products). This includes persons and institutions directly and indirectly involvedwith <strong>CC</strong>A and DRM.Figures 4.1 and 4.2 provide a schematic presentation of <strong>the</strong> risk-vulnerability chain in <strong>the</strong> context of probabilisticrisk modeling (see Annex 4 <strong>for</strong> details about <strong>the</strong> Central American Probabilistic Risk Assessment(CAPRA) as an example of probabilistic risk modeling). In Figure 4.1, capacity is not a separate component,but is included in vulnerability. In fact, <strong>the</strong>re is considerable overlap between vulnerability and capacity,and in many cases <strong>the</strong> risk vulnerability chain is based on Risk = Hazard x Vulnerability. However, becauseof <strong>the</strong> importance of capacity, and <strong>the</strong> fact that it can be conceptually and analytically separated fromvulnerability, it is best to disaggregate vulnerability and capacity.<strong>Climate</strong> change models <strong>for</strong>ecast more intense hurricanes and flooding in some parts of El Salvador andgreater droughts in o<strong>the</strong>r parts. Four aspects of storms are particularly important <strong>for</strong> infrastructure: rainfall,winds, coastal storm surges and floodwaters. Stronger storms have longer periods of rain, higher windspeeds, higher coastal storm surges and greater flooding. <strong>Infrastructure</strong> designers, planners and operatorsshould use probabilistic models and revise codes and standards, instead of relying on <strong>the</strong> deterministicmodels used in <strong>the</strong> past and existing codes and standards. The uncertainty associated with projectingimpacts over 20- or 50- to 100-year time horizons makes probabilistic models an important method <strong>for</strong>incorporating climate change into decision-making processes. The key is to model and understand <strong>the</strong>implications of long-term climate change and determine an optimal combination of no-regrets, low-cost/co-benefit, high-cost priority actions.‘‘ There is a menu of<strong>for</strong>mal and in<strong>for</strong>malinstruments, and nosingle instrument offerscomplete protection.The key is identifyinginstruments thatare appropriate <strong>for</strong>given hazards andvulnerabilities in<strong>the</strong> context ofimmediate risks.’’<strong>Climate</strong> change adaptation and DRM comprise a wide range of strategies and actions at <strong>the</strong> household,community, local, national (and possibly international) levels, aiming to prevent hazards from occurringand/or reducing <strong>the</strong>ir negative impacts. There is a menu of <strong>for</strong>mal and in<strong>for</strong>mal instruments, and no singleinstrument offers complete protection. The key is identifying instruments that are appropriate <strong>for</strong> givenhazards and vulnerabilities in <strong>the</strong> context of immediate risks. Capacities in a specific location should bedeveloped or streng<strong>the</strong>ned in <strong>the</strong> context of long-term climate change to address vulnerabilities andboost resilience. <strong>Climate</strong> change adaptation and DRM strategies include a broad range of interventionsto increase resilience (e.g. engineering design and construction, building codes and standards, insurance,ecosystem management, emergency response), embedded within a holistic suite of capacity and institutional-streng<strong>the</strong>ningef<strong>for</strong>ts that can protect and streng<strong>the</strong>n assets and livelihoods. These strategies andmeasures eventually help society to manage impending risks.<strong>Paving</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Way</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Climate</strong>-<strong>Resilient</strong> <strong>Infrastructure</strong>: Conference Proceedings 21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!