13.07.2015 Views

FINAL SITE INSPECTION REPORT

FINAL SITE INSPECTION REPORT

FINAL SITE INSPECTION REPORT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

161710.0 Summary and Conclusions161816191620162116221623The conclusions of the SI are presented in this section. Recommendations are presented inSection 11.0. Updated CSMs are presented in Appendix J.The six AOCs at Boardman AFR include Target No. 1, Target No. 2, Carty Reservoir BombTarget, Range Complex No. 1, Demolition Area No. 2, and the Impact Area. The formerBoardman AFR is included on the MMRP Inventory in the 2006 ARC (DoD, 2006), and in theASR Supplement (USACE, 2004b), with four identified ranges and three sub-ranges as follows:Range NameRange IDApproximateArea (acres)UTM Coordinates*(meters)Target No. 1 F10OR016001R01 649 N 5063404; E 279733Target No. 2 F10OR016001R02 649 N 5072555; E 280149Carty Reservoir BombTargetF10OR016001R03 649 N 5061866; E 279539Range Complex No. 1F10OR016001R039,505N 5072555; E 280149INPR Site No. 1F10OR016001R03-SR01536N 5072555; E 280149Demolition AreaF10OR016001R03-SR02157N 5072555; E 280149Turret GunneryTraining RangeF10OR016001R03-SR039,443N 5072555; E 280149162416251626162716281629163016311632163316341635*Coordinates for the ranges are in UTM Zone 11N, NAD 1983.Of the 649 total acres reported for the Carty Reservoir Bomb Target, the ASR Supplementindicates 325 acres were on land and 324 acres were water acres. In addition to the four rangesand three sub-ranges, two other areas which were not identified in the range inventory, wereevaluated in this SI. The two areas including coordinates are as follows: Demolition Area No. 2 N 5065433; E 284894 Impact Area N 5059240; E 28233310.1 Target No. 1A visual reconnaissance of Target No. 1 was conducted prior to collecting a soil sample. MD,likely from a M38A2 practice bomb was identified. Previously MD was identified during theINPR site visit. No MEC has been identified at this AOC. The risk for potential MEC at TargetNo. 1 is considered to be low based on the following:Boardman AFR Final SI Report.doc 10-1 Contract No. W912DY-04-D-0010 Delivery Order No. 003September 2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!