roof framing connections in conventional residential construction

More documents

Recommendations

Info

PATH (Partnership for Advanced Technology in Housing) is a new private/public effort todevelop, demonstrate, and gain widespread market acceptance for the “Next Generation” ofAmerican housing. Through the use of new or innovative technologies the goal of PATH is toimprove the quality, durability, environmental efficiency, and affordability of tomorrow’shomes.PATH is managed and supported by the Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD). In addition, all Federal Agencies that engage in housing research and technologydevelopment are PATH Partners, including the Departments of Energy and Commerce, as wellas the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Federal Emergency ManagementAgency (FEMA). State and local governments and other participants from the public sector arealso partners in PATH. Product manufacturers, home builders, insurance companies, and lendersrepresent private industry in the PATH Partnership.To learn more about PATH, please contact:451 7th Street, SWSuite B 133Washington, DC 20410202-708-5873 (fax)e-mail: pathnet@pathnet.orgwebsite: www.pathnet.orgVisit PD&R's Web Sitewww.huduser.orgto find this report and others sponsored byHUD's Office of Policy Development and Research (PD&R).Other services of HUD USER, PD&R's Research Information Service, include listservs; special interest, bimonthlypublications (best practices, significant studies from other sources); access to public use databases; hotline1-800-245-2691 for help accessing the information you need.
ROOF FRAMING CONNECTIONS INCONVENTIONAL RESIDENTIALCONSTRUCTIONPrepared forThe U.S. Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentOffice of Policy Development and ResearchWashington, DCbyNAHB Research Center, Inc.400 Prince George's BoulevardUpper Marlboro, MD 20774-8731Contract No. H-21172CAFebruary 2002
Page 9 and 10: LIST OF TABLESTable 1 - Selected Re
Page 11: LIST OF FIGURESPageFigure 1 - Rafte
Page 14 and 15: Section 3. Section 4 includes three
Page 16: Therefore, it can be assumed that t
Page 19 and 20: TABLE 1SELECTED RESISTANCE DATA FRO
Page 21 and 22: Uplift tests were conducted on toe-
Page 23 and 24: Table 3 summarizes specific gravity
Page 25 and 26: connections. Test results were used
Page 27: measurements were collected by the
Page 31 and 32: An examination of the load-deformat
Page 34 and 35: 32 percent. The differences between
Page 36: 4.1.4 Design ApplicationsThis secti
Page 39 and 40: 4.2 TASK 2 - FULL-SCALE ROOF-TO-WAL
Page 41 and 42: double top plate was fastened to th
Page 43 and 44: TABLE 16SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS FOR
Page 45 and 46: Figure 16Truss Separation from Top
Page 47 and 48: Table 17 compares the experimental
Page 49 and 50: Maximum 0.2 sec design spectral res
Page 51 and 52: TABLE 18SPECIMEN CONFIGURATIONS FOR
Page 53 and 54:
700600500400Load, lb30020010010 cur
Page 55 and 56:
Figure 26Toe-Nailed Joint ResponseT
Page 57 and 58:
5.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONSThe anal
Page 59 and 60:
[7] Wilkinson, T. L. 1993. Bolted C
Page 61 and 62:
APPENDIX ACALCULATION OF LATERAL NA
Page 63 and 64:
Nail8d common -toe-nailedTABLE A3UL
Page 65 and 66:
Nail8d common -toe-nailed16d pneuma
show all

roof framing connections in conventional residential construction

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?