BUSINESS REVIEW: PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIESPrincipal risks <strong>and</strong> uncertaintiescontinuedRISKINCREASED COMPETITION IN THE WATER ANDWASTEWATER INDUSTRYThe Cave review of competition <strong>and</strong> innovation in water marketswas published in April <strong>2009</strong>. If its recommendations areimplemented, this would eventually exp<strong>and</strong> the competitivemarket allowing retail competition to all non-householdcustomers. Ofwat has also taken steps to introduce competitioninto the water supply market through inset appointments <strong>and</strong>the water licensing supply regime. Prior to 2007 (with oneexception), inset appointees had all been granted to existingregulated companies. Since 2007, Ofwat has granted more insetappointments, two of which are within UUW’s region. Furtherinset appointments may be made in the future, resulting inincreased competition.MITIGATIONThe group has been fully engaged in the Ofwat consultationson the Cave review, although a relatively small proportion ofthe group’s profits derives directly from non-household retailactivities. If competition is exp<strong>and</strong>ed, there would beopportunities for the group to participate in a wider market inEngl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Wales. As far as inset appointments are concerned,these generally relate to new developments or large industrialcustomers. Furthermore, the regulated business has not receivedany applications from holders of water supply licences to supplyany premises within its region.EVENTS, SERVICE INTERRUPTIONS, SYSTEMSFAILURES, WATER SHORTAGES OR CONTAMINATIONOF WATER SUPPLIESThe group controls <strong>and</strong> operates utility networks <strong>and</strong> maintainsthe associated assets with the objective of providing a continuousservice. In exceptional circumstances, electricity, gas or watershortages or the failure of an asset, an element of a network orsupporting plant <strong>and</strong> equipment could result in the interruptionof service provision or catastrophic damage resulting insignificant loss of life <strong>and</strong>/or environmental damage <strong>and</strong>/oreconomic <strong>and</strong> social disruption. The group could be fined forbreaches of statutory obligations or held liable to third parties,or be required to provide an alternative water supply of equivalentquality, which could increase costs. The group is also dependenton the ability to access, utilise <strong>and</strong> communicate remotely viaelectronic software applications mounted upon corporateinformation technology hardware <strong>and</strong> communicating throughinternal <strong>and</strong> external networks. The ownership, maintenance <strong>and</strong>recovery of such applications, hardware <strong>and</strong> networks are notwholly under its control.The group operates long-st<strong>and</strong>ing, well tested <strong>and</strong> appropriatelyresourced incident response <strong>and</strong> escalation procedures. Theprocesses continue to be refined, together with risk management<strong>and</strong> business continuity procedures, recognising that possibleevents have varying impacts <strong>and</strong> likelihoods. While the groupseeks to ensure that it has appropriate processes in place, therecan be no certainty that such measures will be effective inpreventing or, when necessary, managing large-scale incidentsto the satisfaction of customers, regulators, government <strong>and</strong> thewider stakeholder community. The group also maintains insurancecover in relation to losses <strong>and</strong> liabilities likely to be associatedwith such significant risks, although potential liabilities arisingfrom a catastrophic event could exceed the maximum level ofinsurance cover that can be obtained cost effectively. Theregulated business’s licence also contains a ‘shipwreck’ clausethat, if applicable, may offer a degree of recourse to Ofwat inthe event of a major incident.RISKS IN THE GROUP’S NON-REGULATED BUSINESSOutside the regulated business, the group provides servicesrelating to the operation <strong>and</strong> management of assets for otherutility clients in the UK <strong>and</strong> overseas. These services include themaintenance <strong>and</strong> operation of electricity, gas <strong>and</strong> water networks,the design <strong>and</strong> construction of new assets, the design <strong>and</strong>construction of new connections to the relevant network <strong>and</strong> theprovision of ancillary services. The delivery of contracts, bothexisting <strong>and</strong> future, will be achieved by exploiting the group’s coreinfrastructure management skills <strong>and</strong> may also require capitalexpenditure. The overstretching of such skills could lead to a lossof customers or the inability to meet contractual commitments,or to the incurrence of penalties.The costs <strong>and</strong> risks associated with these new projects are subjectto internal reviews before approval is given to commit to them.The group aims to comply with its contractual commitments oroperating performance targets <strong>and</strong> any requirements to maintainservice continuity or achieve specified operating efficiencies inrelation to those clients. Within the non-regulated business, thefocus is on deploying the group’s core skills on an asset-lightbasis, whilst continually monitoring contract performance,together with programme <strong>and</strong> project management.18 unitedutilities.com
RISKMATERIAL LITIGATIONNOSS Consortium (NOSS), of which North West WaterInternational Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of <strong>United</strong><strong>Utilities</strong> Group PLC, is a member <strong>and</strong> the sole remaining activeparticipant, is party to arbitration proceedings in Thail<strong>and</strong>in relation to a design <strong>and</strong> construction contract dated1 November 1993 between NOSS <strong>and</strong> the Bangkok MetropolitanAdministration (BMA) to build a wastewater treatment plant<strong>and</strong> network in central Bangkok. Following disagreements withthe engineer (Dorsch Consult) <strong>and</strong> disputes with the BMA,NOSS terminated the contract with the BMA <strong>and</strong> served anotice of arbitration. NOSS has total claims against the BMA ofapproximately six billion baht. The BMA has counter claimed forapproximately three billion baht; however, based upon the facts<strong>and</strong> matters currently known, the counterclaim appears to lacksubstance. Although there have been some delays in the arbitralprocess, the arbitration now appears set to proceed.In February <strong>2009</strong> the group was served with notice of a multiparty‘class action’ in Argentina into which <strong>United</strong> <strong>Utilities</strong>International Limited (UUIL) was enjoined in 2007. The classaction is related to the issuance <strong>and</strong> payment default of aUS$230 million bond by Inversora Eléctrica de Buenos Aires S.A.(IEBA), an Argentine project company set up to purchase one ofthe Argentine electricity distribution networks, which wasprivatised in 1997. UUIL had a 45 per cent shareholding in IEBAwhich it sold in 2005. The class action is being pursued againstvarious parties, including the original direct <strong>and</strong> indirectshareholders of IEBA, the banks which advised IEBA <strong>and</strong> therating agencies of the bonds. The bonds, which were issuedin 1997, were defaulted in March 2002 <strong>and</strong> IEBA entered aninsolvency process in 2003. The claim is for a non-quantifiedamount of unspecified damages, <strong>and</strong> purports to be pursuedon behalf of unidentified consumer bondholders in IEBA whoallegedly lost money. UUIL has filed a defence to the action<strong>and</strong> will vigorously resist the proceedings, given the robustdefences that UUIL has been advised that it has on procedural<strong>and</strong> substantive grounds.MITIGATIONThe group faces the general risk of litigation in connection withits businesses. In most cases, liability for litigation is difficult toassess or quantify; recovery may be sought for very large <strong>and</strong>/orindeterminate amounts <strong>and</strong> the existence <strong>and</strong> magnitude ofliability may remain unknown for substantial periods of time. Thegroup robustly defends litigation where appropriate <strong>and</strong> seeksto minimise its exposure to such claims by early identification ofrisks <strong>and</strong> compliance with its legal <strong>and</strong> other obligations. Basedupon the facts <strong>and</strong> matters currently known <strong>and</strong> the provisionscarried in the group’s balance sheet, the directors are of theopinion that the possibility of the disputes referred to in this risksection having a material adverse effect on the group’s <strong>financial</strong>position is remote.Business reviewunitedutilities.com 19