13.07.2015 Views

Annual report and financial statement 2009 - United Utilities

Annual report and financial statement 2009 - United Utilities

Annual report and financial statement 2009 - United Utilities

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

RISKMATERIAL LITIGATIONNOSS Consortium (NOSS), of which North West WaterInternational Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of <strong>United</strong><strong>Utilities</strong> Group PLC, is a member <strong>and</strong> the sole remaining activeparticipant, is party to arbitration proceedings in Thail<strong>and</strong>in relation to a design <strong>and</strong> construction contract dated1 November 1993 between NOSS <strong>and</strong> the Bangkok MetropolitanAdministration (BMA) to build a wastewater treatment plant<strong>and</strong> network in central Bangkok. Following disagreements withthe engineer (Dorsch Consult) <strong>and</strong> disputes with the BMA,NOSS terminated the contract with the BMA <strong>and</strong> served anotice of arbitration. NOSS has total claims against the BMA ofapproximately six billion baht. The BMA has counter claimed forapproximately three billion baht; however, based upon the facts<strong>and</strong> matters currently known, the counterclaim appears to lacksubstance. Although there have been some delays in the arbitralprocess, the arbitration now appears set to proceed.In February <strong>2009</strong> the group was served with notice of a multiparty‘class action’ in Argentina into which <strong>United</strong> <strong>Utilities</strong>International Limited (UUIL) was enjoined in 2007. The classaction is related to the issuance <strong>and</strong> payment default of aUS$230 million bond by Inversora Eléctrica de Buenos Aires S.A.(IEBA), an Argentine project company set up to purchase one ofthe Argentine electricity distribution networks, which wasprivatised in 1997. UUIL had a 45 per cent shareholding in IEBAwhich it sold in 2005. The class action is being pursued againstvarious parties, including the original direct <strong>and</strong> indirectshareholders of IEBA, the banks which advised IEBA <strong>and</strong> therating agencies of the bonds. The bonds, which were issuedin 1997, were defaulted in March 2002 <strong>and</strong> IEBA entered aninsolvency process in 2003. The claim is for a non-quantifiedamount of unspecified damages, <strong>and</strong> purports to be pursuedon behalf of unidentified consumer bondholders in IEBA whoallegedly lost money. UUIL has filed a defence to the action<strong>and</strong> will vigorously resist the proceedings, given the robustdefences that UUIL has been advised that it has on procedural<strong>and</strong> substantive grounds.MITIGATIONThe group faces the general risk of litigation in connection withits businesses. In most cases, liability for litigation is difficult toassess or quantify; recovery may be sought for very large <strong>and</strong>/orindeterminate amounts <strong>and</strong> the existence <strong>and</strong> magnitude ofliability may remain unknown for substantial periods of time. Thegroup robustly defends litigation where appropriate <strong>and</strong> seeksto minimise its exposure to such claims by early identification ofrisks <strong>and</strong> compliance with its legal <strong>and</strong> other obligations. Basedupon the facts <strong>and</strong> matters currently known <strong>and</strong> the provisionscarried in the group’s balance sheet, the directors are of theopinion that the possibility of the disputes referred to in this risksection having a material adverse effect on the group’s <strong>financial</strong>position is remote.Business reviewunitedutilities.com 19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!