13.07.2015 Views

Statistical models of elasticity in main chain and smectic liquid ...

Statistical models of elasticity in main chain and smectic liquid ...

Statistical models of elasticity in main chain and smectic liquid ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.4. SYSTEMS WHERE A POLARISATION RESULTS 673.4 Systems where a polarisation results3.4.1 Oscillat<strong>in</strong>g shearThe dynamics <strong>of</strong> <strong>liquid</strong> crystal elastomers are complicated because <strong>of</strong> thecoupl<strong>in</strong>g between the <strong>liquid</strong> crystall<strong>in</strong>e degrees <strong>of</strong> freedom <strong>and</strong> the underly<strong>in</strong>gpolymer matrix. As stated already, it is possible to identify several time scales<strong>in</strong> the elastomer. A s<strong>in</strong>gle free polymer str<strong>and</strong> has an associated relaxationtime called theRousetime τ p ∼ 10 −4 −10 −6 s, <strong>and</strong> themesogenic unitshave anassociated relaxation time τ LC ∼ 10 −1 −10 −2 s. However the polymer networkas a whole relaxes accord<strong>in</strong>g to a power law <strong>and</strong> so has no associated scale.The polarisation associated with the dynamics <strong>of</strong> a <strong>liquid</strong> crystal elastomer isnow calculated under the assumption that the polymer network responds veryquickly <strong>and</strong> then the director relaxes much more slowly <strong>in</strong>to its equilibriumorientation. For an elastomer that displays suchaseparation <strong>of</strong> timescales therelaxation <strong>of</strong> the polymer can be neglected (it is assumed to be <strong>in</strong>stantaneous)<strong>and</strong> the slower dynamics <strong>of</strong> the director focused upon [52]. In this case thesystem can bemodelled as an over-damped oscillator with a damp<strong>in</strong>gconstantγ associated with the return to equilibrium <strong>of</strong> the director. The force caus<strong>in</strong>gthe return to equilibrium is governed by the gradient <strong>of</strong> the equilibrium freeenergy density∂(f −χn·n)γṅ = − , (3.45)∂nwhere the Lagrange multiplier has aga<strong>in</strong> been <strong>in</strong>cluded to prevent chang<strong>in</strong>g<strong>of</strong> the length <strong>of</strong> the director dur<strong>in</strong>g the motion. Us<strong>in</strong>g the the small deformationform for the free energy density given previously <strong>and</strong> then apply<strong>in</strong>g theconstra<strong>in</strong>t n·n = 1 to f<strong>in</strong>d χ as before, then <strong>in</strong> the notation <strong>of</strong> section §3.3.1,the result<strong>in</strong>g equation isγṅ = −µ ( )1r −1)( (l 0 +l ′ )·n−n(n·(l 0 +l ′ )·n)(3.46)To pick out the symmetric <strong>and</strong> antisymmetric contributions to this expressionconsider a deformation <strong>of</strong> the form⎛ ⎞1 0 η +δλ = ⎝ 0 1 0 ⎠. (3.47)η −δ 0 1On substitut<strong>in</strong>g this deformation <strong>in</strong>to Eq. (3.46) the follow<strong>in</strong>g expression forthe angle <strong>of</strong> the director is obta<strong>in</strong>ed( ) 1−rγ˙θ = µ (((r −1)δ −(r +1)η)cos2θ +(r −1)s<strong>in</strong>2θ) (3.48)r= −D 1 s<strong>in</strong>2θ −(2D 1 δ(t)+D 2 η(t))cos2θ, (3.49)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!