altllough constituted differently from the political unions,<strong>and</strong> worltirlg I)y other means, 11:u.l the same ultimateobject in view :IS the latter, namely, the parlial ameliorationof the condition of the working class as a rv~rlti~~~class. But wltile the political unions sought to obtainbenefit in a gradu:il wltt intlirect manner, b~reducingtaxation, <strong>and</strong> by otller means, the trades' u~lions endeavometlto accomplish the wished-for entl immediately <strong>and</strong>directly, by compelling the capitalist <strong>and</strong> the employer toreftlnd, in the shape of increased wages, a part of that vastamount of ~vealtll \rrhich tllcy were arir~ually dra\cing fromtllc worlting classes: tlley were endeavorwing, in fact, toact soniewl~at upon tlle ~)rinciplc of equal cxcltanges, byol)tainitlg the frill vallle of their I;:l)o~ir.r 17 lle great body of the worltir~g ~I~ISSCS believet1 thattheir 1;ite trades' ~lniorls woultl be omnil)otctlt in effectingtheir tlelivcrance from the tlomit~iotl of tlle capit;llist ; for;I Illore powerful cr~gine was never made use of by tlle 1)rodtrcers.From there being many trades united together,ant1 supporting each otl~er, when one struclt a blow attyranny, that blow fell with tlte accumulated monetaryforce of the nrhole mass. But, whether victorious ordefeated, the workman was alilie involvetl in losses <strong>and</strong> indifljculties-all his eflorts for the permanent bettering ofItis condition were i~leffectual-<strong>and</strong> this vast confederationupas at length brolten up, <strong>and</strong> dissolved into its primitivetrade societies. Tl~ese have conti~lr~etl, at times, a desultory<strong>and</strong> unequal contest wit11 cal)ital-sometimes withpartial success, but oftener wit11 defeat arltl ruin. TIlecal)italist <strong>and</strong> the employer have always ultimately bcentoo strong for them ; <strong>and</strong> tratles' unions have beconic,iclnongst the enemies of the rvorliing CI:ISS, a bye-wrortl ofcaution or contempt-a record of the \~ealincss of Labour\r hen op~~osed to Capital-:in indestructible nlemento ofthe evil ~vorlting of the present system in regard to thetwo great classes which now compose society.illany reasons are given to account for the dissolution<strong>and</strong> destruction of tlie trades' unions. There was illnumerous czises abject poverty amongst multitudes of themembers ; <strong>and</strong>, in some instances, there was treachery <strong>and</strong>roljhery on the part of leaders, \rlliclr naturally bceot suspicionant1 (listrust. nfuch tyranny antl it,justlce wasinflicted by both sides on indiviilrlal \vorlting men <strong>and</strong>individual capitalists, <strong>and</strong> much precious ~vealtll wasted byeach to no good purpose. But, \rhatever may have bcenthe more immediate <strong>and</strong> apparent cause of fi~ilore, it iscertain, from the nature of tlle wrong, that it was not possiblefor the remedy of the trades' unions to succeed anybetter than tile remedy of the politicians. Neitller partywent far enough. The same primitive cause has th~rartedthe endeavours <strong>and</strong> blighted the energies of both. Theevils to be remedied flomed naturally froln, <strong>and</strong> weredependent upon, the social system anri tlre principle of1rnequa1<strong>and</strong> as neitller politic;~l llor trades'unions tor~~lled the system or the principle, they could notpossibly touch the wrong cont~ected with tllem.Unsntistied ;llil;e \vitll the result obtaitlctl b!r both plitical<strong>and</strong> tr;ldes' ~lllions, a orti ti on of tlle worl
102 LAIIOUR'S WRONGS ANDwages to the miserable pittance wl~ich so many thousantlsof them receive. The trlte remetly, therefore, ant1 the onlyremetly, is, to reducc the nutnbcr of tlie c:tpitalists <strong>and</strong>proprietors, that more rvealtlt Inay bc enjoyed by the .rvorkingclass. If the present arr;ingements of society-theaccursecl system of unequal cxcl~angcs-enables one-fiftll ofthe nation to seize upon one-llalf of all that is it isself-evident that no decrease in the amount of production-110 reduction in the hours of labonr-cat, at all illcrerrsethe sllarc of tlie worlting class. Tl~e share of n~ealthwhich they in either c:tse receive <strong>and</strong> enjoy, will be governedsolely I)y thc number of itllcrs they are coml)cllec! tomaintain; itnd, therefore, the lcss tltc we:tlth rnl~i~l~ the~vorlcing classes ~)rotlrlcc, the less will hc tlre sl~arc rcceirctlby tl~ent. Thus, if they work fetr~er I~ours they will producelcss .ivcaltlt--thcrc will r~cccss;n.ily be lcss to divideI~etween themselves <strong>and</strong> the caj)italists-<strong>and</strong> the result ofsuch rctluctiort in the hours of labollr will I)e,-not thatthe worlcing classes ~rrill receive a ~reater sl~are, but tltatboth .they <strong>and</strong> tlte capitalists will receive less. This principleapplies generally to the working class, as a class ; but thecircumstances .rr,hich determine the hours \rliich sl~all beworketl <strong>and</strong> tl~e priccs which shall be pitid in particulartrades, arise from causes dependent on dcmat~d <strong>and</strong> supply--causes ~rrl~ich, under the present system, no legislativemeasure can beneficially elrect.It must never Le forgotten by the working class, whenreviewing tlteir wrongs ancl devising remetlies, that theirwarfare is not ngait16t men, but against it system-thatthey are fighting i~ot against tlie cal)itaiists, as intlividuals,nor against capital itself, but ngainst the presezt mode qfapplying capilal-against that s,yslem mlvhich gives to irresponsibleindivid~~uls the power of grindi~lg nzas.tes ofZubo~r letntee?~ masses of capital. There is no I-onetlyfor this, except a change of system. Without such achange, the cause of the retlemption of the 1s-orking classis a hopeless one !It mould be a waste of time to recapitulate the whole ofthe various schemes ~vhiclt have heen at times devisetl tocore, or at least to account for, the present state of things.The capitalists <strong>and</strong> the political economists have not beenidle in this latter service; <strong>and</strong> amongst the many iucomprehensible<strong>and</strong> contratlictory doctrioes ~vlticli they havcbrought forth to account for much work esistin, 0 1n ' connectionlvith little wages-<strong>and</strong> to accollnt, also for somemen being poor, <strong>and</strong> some men being rich-some doingthe work, <strong>and</strong> others receiving alrnost all tlte benefit-is the Fallacy of dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> supply. Tlie economistsmostplace the capital irnd the capitalists oilthe one sideJ the work <strong>and</strong> the working class on theother. When it happens that there arc more workingmen than call be employed by the capitalist, the former aretold that there is a "glut of labour" in the market.Work is dificult to procure, <strong>and</strong>, if obtained, it must bedone for less money than was before received. Ut~der thepresent arrangenlcnts of society, tllere is always such Ird l glut of labour," as it is calletl, in alnlost every trade <strong>and</strong>profession-t:l~re is ever a greater or less number of met1only employed, or altogetlter unenlplopetl, <strong>and</strong>thus placed on the very verge of starvation. The econo-~nists tell us that this state of tltings is not del)eridetltupon, nor in any way connected witlt, form of government; but that it happens necessarily <strong>and</strong> unavoidably,<strong>and</strong> can only be removed by the course of proceetli~~gwhich they point out. They say tltat there is only a certainquantity of capital or rnoney in the country capableof being applied to the purposes of prot1uct;on ; that thismoney, therefore, being thus limited, can only employ iicertain number of labourers at 20s. a week, or double tltatnumber at IOs., or four times that number at 5s.:-tlliitit from hence necessarily follonrs, that the inore 1:lboureruthere arc, tlie worse it mill be for them; <strong>and</strong>, tltcrefore,the only remedy for this inequality between Inbour aitdcapital is, for sorile of the labtturers to "go out of tlte nlilrket,"-tokeep down their numbers-to emigrate, or dieoff by disease <strong>and</strong> starvation, until they arc spin ~vithinthe range of Capital, <strong>and</strong> there are ratller fewer of theatthan are wanted. When this takes place, say the economists,Capital <strong>and</strong> Labour ~vill tnaitttaiu their naturitlequilibrium, <strong>and</strong> tlic competition among the capitalists willraise to their proper level the wages of those 1s-orliing menwho remain; for, say they, it is tlte competition amongstthe worlting classes to obtain etnploymcnt, ~vhich no~vbrings down the value of labour; <strong>and</strong>, so long as there ;irea greater number of \vorlting inen tltiirt the c:~pitalists l~i~\.rmoney to emplny, it is beyood tlte power of ulan, either by
- Page 1 and 2: LABOUR'S WRONGSAND LABOUB'S REMEDY;
- Page 3 and 4: and tlie eternity of existing usage
- Page 5 and 6: the award. And thus, having the acc
- Page 8 and 9: LABOUR'S REMEDY. 17they complain of
- Page 10 and 11: from the common course of events, t
- Page 12 and 13: on inequality of bodily and ~nental
- Page 14 and 15: as firmly as if they had been fette
- Page 16 and 17: tion from labour which the latter e
- Page 18 and 19: eligious observances on a stated da
- Page 20 and 21: proceed,-not from the nature of man
- Page 22 and 23: een an actual curse--only because m
- Page 24 and 25: 48 LABOUR'S WRONGS ANDbenefited; co
- Page 26 and 27: emedy for their wrongs; but it has
- Page 28 and 29: This latter condition alorle condem
- Page 30: LXUDUR'~ REMEDY.6 1produce tllere i
- Page 33 and 34: LABOUR'S WRONGS A ~ DCHAPTER V.THE
- Page 35 and 36: 70 LABOUR'S WRONGS ANDthis vast sum
- Page 37 and 38: e ascribed to the existence of the
- Page 39 and 40: 78 LABOUR'S TVRONGS ANDand therefor
- Page 41 and 42: 62 LAI~OUR'S WRONGS ANDfor thousall
- Page 43 and 44: LABOCIL'S REMEDY. 67ready seen, fro
- Page 45 and 46: he diminished. As for the labour, i
- Page 47 and 48: lessness of all such cllanges, eith
- Page 49: another Itas been abandoned, antl e
- Page 53 and 54: LABOUR'S REMEDY. ! 07ploycc! neighh
- Page 55 and 56: LABOUR'S REMEDY. 111their labour \v
- Page 57 and 58: or make it independent of external
- Page 59 and 60: ation, or the union and direction o
- Page 61 and 62: u11ior1 csccl)t where 1;ibour is un
- Page 63 and 64: LXUOUII'S REMEDY. 127man feelings a
- Page 65 and 66: tl~inh-, feel, or act precisely tli
- Page 67 and 68: 134 I,?\ ROUR'S I\'ROTi\'GS ANDmany
- Page 69 and 70: may easily be conceivctl of; for it
- Page 71: vessels of various descriptions, an
- Page 74 and 75: connection with the established gor
- Page 76 and 77: atocks of metal in the banks decrea
- Page 78 and 79: 156 LABOUR'S WRONGS IXDpower of suc
- Page 80 and 81: The opinion entertained of a man by
- Page 82 and 83: tastes and ignorant appliances of t
- Page 84 and 85: then wlll the unknown and now unapp
- Page 86 and 87: the protluctive classes must still
- Page 88 and 89: 176 LABOUR'S WRONGS ANDgalling fett
- Page 91 and 92: character of these arrangements in
- Page 93 and 94: duction of lnacliinery and the cons
- Page 95 and 96: L.~BOUIZ'S REMEDY. 191to the existi
- Page 97 and 98: all these companies, and estenlls t
- Page 99 and 100: plished under the joint-stoclc syst
- Page 101 and 102:
exchanges. " 1\11 evidence," also,
- Page 103 and 104:
206 LABOUR'S JI1I'ICONGS ANDmills i
- Page 105 and 106:
2 10 LACOUR'S WRONGS ANDup1)er clas
- Page 107 and 108:
In regarding any nntf every ren~edy