Talking to Groups that Use Terror.pdf - United States Institute of Peace
Talking to Groups that Use Terror.pdf - United States Institute of Peace
Talking to Groups that Use Terror.pdf - United States Institute of Peace
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Peace</strong>maker’s ToolkitWhen such a back channel is exposed, it can prove embarrassing <strong>to</strong>governments <strong>that</strong> claimed not <strong>to</strong> negotiate with terrorists, but the use <strong>of</strong>intelligence <strong>of</strong>ficials is less politically risky than formal ties.Engage in Covert TalksDiplomats or other senior government <strong>of</strong>ficials can convey the seriousness<strong>of</strong> a government’s commitment <strong>to</strong> talks more convincingly than otherinterlocu<strong>to</strong>rs. Similarly, a media<strong>to</strong>r or senior member <strong>of</strong> his or her teamcan underscore a readiness <strong>to</strong> start substantive talks by meeting in personwith the representatives <strong>of</strong> a PAG. However, a government—or media<strong>to</strong>r—may have many powerful reasons not <strong>to</strong> want <strong>to</strong> make such personalcontact public, not the least <strong>of</strong> which is the danger <strong>of</strong> provoking afires<strong>to</strong>rm <strong>of</strong> condemnation for sitting down with a group <strong>that</strong> is currentlymurdering its political enemies and members <strong>of</strong> the public. In suchcircumstances, covert talks may be the only practicable option.In 1972, even though the British government <strong>of</strong>ficially foresworenegotiations with the IRA, senior British <strong>of</strong>ficials met with IRA members,including Gerry Adams, who was transported from prison for the talks.Covert talks, however, are dangerous in themselves, because they runthe risk <strong>of</strong> being discovered—or, more likely, being revealed. Members <strong>of</strong>the government who are uneasy about the talks may leak details <strong>of</strong> theirexistence <strong>to</strong> the media. And the terrorist group may itself publicize theexistence <strong>of</strong> the talks if they do not generate the results the group hadhoped they would. Remember <strong>that</strong> at this stage <strong>of</strong> the conflict, mutualdistrust is very high and violence is likely <strong>to</strong> be ongoing. Indeed, the secrettalks <strong>of</strong>ten take place at the same time as each side tries <strong>to</strong> improve itsbargaining position via military action. 19Talk with Political WingsIf direct talks with terrorists are <strong>to</strong>o difficult <strong>to</strong> arrange or <strong>to</strong>o morallyor politically objectionable, media<strong>to</strong>rs and negotia<strong>to</strong>rs can work througha political wing <strong>of</strong> the PAG. Sometimes, indeed, governments help <strong>to</strong>create such wings. Governments can knowingly allow a group <strong>to</strong> form anovert political wing as a way <strong>of</strong> engaging the organization. Governmentscan then negotiate directly or indirectly with these political figures withless risk.50