13.07.2015 Views

Talking to Groups that Use Terror.pdf - United States Institute of Peace

Talking to Groups that Use Terror.pdf - United States Institute of Peace

Talking to Groups that Use Terror.pdf - United States Institute of Peace

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Peace</strong>maker’s ToolkitWhen such a back channel is exposed, it can prove embarrassing <strong>to</strong>governments <strong>that</strong> claimed not <strong>to</strong> negotiate with terrorists, but the use <strong>of</strong>intelligence <strong>of</strong>ficials is less politically risky than formal ties.Engage in Covert TalksDiplomats or other senior government <strong>of</strong>ficials can convey the seriousness<strong>of</strong> a government’s commitment <strong>to</strong> talks more convincingly than otherinterlocu<strong>to</strong>rs. Similarly, a media<strong>to</strong>r or senior member <strong>of</strong> his or her teamcan underscore a readiness <strong>to</strong> start substantive talks by meeting in personwith the representatives <strong>of</strong> a PAG. However, a government—or media<strong>to</strong>r—may have many powerful reasons not <strong>to</strong> want <strong>to</strong> make such personalcontact public, not the least <strong>of</strong> which is the danger <strong>of</strong> provoking afires<strong>to</strong>rm <strong>of</strong> condemnation for sitting down with a group <strong>that</strong> is currentlymurdering its political enemies and members <strong>of</strong> the public. In suchcircumstances, covert talks may be the only practicable option.In 1972, even though the British government <strong>of</strong>ficially foresworenegotiations with the IRA, senior British <strong>of</strong>ficials met with IRA members,including Gerry Adams, who was transported from prison for the talks.Covert talks, however, are dangerous in themselves, because they runthe risk <strong>of</strong> being discovered—or, more likely, being revealed. Members <strong>of</strong>the government who are uneasy about the talks may leak details <strong>of</strong> theirexistence <strong>to</strong> the media. And the terrorist group may itself publicize theexistence <strong>of</strong> the talks if they do not generate the results the group hadhoped they would. Remember <strong>that</strong> at this stage <strong>of</strong> the conflict, mutualdistrust is very high and violence is likely <strong>to</strong> be ongoing. Indeed, the secrettalks <strong>of</strong>ten take place at the same time as each side tries <strong>to</strong> improve itsbargaining position via military action. 19Talk with Political WingsIf direct talks with terrorists are <strong>to</strong>o difficult <strong>to</strong> arrange or <strong>to</strong>o morallyor politically objectionable, media<strong>to</strong>rs and negotia<strong>to</strong>rs can work througha political wing <strong>of</strong> the PAG. Sometimes, indeed, governments help <strong>to</strong>create such wings. Governments can knowingly allow a group <strong>to</strong> form anovert political wing as a way <strong>of</strong> engaging the organization. Governmentscan then negotiate directly or indirectly with these political figures withless risk.50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!