13.07.2015 Views

Talking to Groups that Use Terror.pdf - United States Institute of Peace

Talking to Groups that Use Terror.pdf - United States Institute of Peace

Talking to Groups that Use Terror.pdf - United States Institute of Peace

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Step 5: Facilitate Negotiationsduring a peace process. In democratic societies, although governmentsusually have the upper hand over terrorist groups in terms <strong>of</strong> theorchestration <strong>of</strong> domestic propaganda, independent television, radio,and press outlets can play major roles in shaping public opinion. Innondemocratic societies, where a government will usually be able <strong>to</strong> controlcoverage <strong>of</strong> the conflict and the peace process by domestic media, it usuallyfalls <strong>to</strong> the international media <strong>to</strong> report violations <strong>of</strong> human rights by thesecurity forces and <strong>to</strong> uncover or publicize failures by the government <strong>to</strong>honor the terms <strong>of</strong> agreements reached at the negotiating table.For these reasons, the media<strong>to</strong>r should establish and maintain goodrelations with both the domestic and the international media. Toward thisend, the media<strong>to</strong>r should make himself or herself accessible <strong>to</strong> journalistslooking for interviews, ensure <strong>that</strong> his or her team regularly briefs themedia on the progress <strong>of</strong> talks, and arrange pho<strong>to</strong>-ops and other events<strong>that</strong> spotlight key figures, events, and developments in the peace process.<strong>Use</strong> Deadlines Adroitly When Pressing forAgreementThere are no hard and fast rules about if, when, and how <strong>to</strong> use deadlines<strong>to</strong> pressure the parties <strong>to</strong> come <strong>to</strong> an agreement. Deadlines can certainlybe helpful in developing among the parties a sense <strong>of</strong> purpose andurgency—in creating the image <strong>of</strong> a peace process as a train <strong>that</strong> is about<strong>to</strong> depart from the station whether or not all parties are aboard. In theabsence <strong>of</strong> a deadline, the parties might continue talking indefinitely,conscious <strong>that</strong> ongoing talks are less risky (in terms <strong>of</strong> political standingand personal safety) than reaching an agreement <strong>that</strong> one’s own hardlinersmight violently reject or <strong>that</strong> exposes one’s side <strong>to</strong> domination bythe other.Unsurprisingly, a deadline is most likely <strong>to</strong> work when all sides havebeen consulted about it in advance and buy in<strong>to</strong> it. In Northern Ireland,Mitchell had spent weeks discussing a deadline <strong>of</strong> Good Friday with all theparticipants and working <strong>to</strong> get their support. Before he presented the revisedplan for their approval he knew it would be agreed <strong>to</strong> unanimously. Theheadlines in the newspapers said <strong>that</strong> he had imposed a deadline, but inreality he had not imposed anything; the parties had accepted the deadlinebecause they were as eager as Mitchell <strong>to</strong> get an agreement. 3779

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!