13.07.2015 Views

Talking to Groups that Use Terror.pdf - United States Institute of Peace

Talking to Groups that Use Terror.pdf - United States Institute of Peace

Talking to Groups that Use Terror.pdf - United States Institute of Peace

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Step 6: Protect the Process from the Effects <strong>of</strong> Violenceovernight; the accuser and alleged viola<strong>to</strong>rs would have thirty minutes onthe following day <strong>to</strong> makes their cases, followed by a question-and-answersession and a general discussion; then the governments would decide. 38Whatever penalties are imposed for a violation <strong>of</strong> the ground rules,they should not be so severe <strong>that</strong> they au<strong>to</strong>matically destroy the process.Penalties might include public criticism, s<strong>to</strong>pping diplomatic contacts,and temporary suspension from participation in the negotiations.Readmittance <strong>to</strong> the talks can be made contingent on the suspended partycommitting no further violence in the interim.Although the temporary expulsions <strong>of</strong> the Ulster Democratic Party (UDP)and Sinn Fein following murders committed by their military wings weredismissed by some as “a spell in the sin bin,” they were the “minimum actionrequired <strong>to</strong> justify claims <strong>that</strong> the Mitchell principles would be enforced. Theacceptance <strong>of</strong> the suspension by the UDP and Sinn Fein, however truculently,indicated their determination <strong>to</strong> remain within the peace process.” 39A media<strong>to</strong>r or negotia<strong>to</strong>r should keep the door open as long as possiblefor a PAG <strong>that</strong> seems <strong>to</strong> have a genuine interest in recommencingnegotiations and for groups <strong>that</strong> have previously opposed participation inthe talks but now have indicated an interest in renouncing violence andengaging in the political process. But the door should be closed firmlyonce a PAG shows itself <strong>to</strong> be unwilling or unable <strong>to</strong> refrain from violence.ETA has entered in<strong>to</strong> negotiations at various times over several decades buthas <strong>of</strong>ten undermined those talks by its attachment <strong>to</strong> violence. In March2006, for instance, ETA declared a “permanent cease-fire” and expressedinterest in peace negotiations, but as those talks progressed ETA under<strong>to</strong>ok anumber <strong>of</strong> provocative acts (such as stealing three hundred weapons andammunition) and then de<strong>to</strong>nated a bomb at Madrid airport, killing twopeople and prompting the Spanish government <strong>to</strong> publicly denounce theexplosion and withdraw from the talks. Four years later, when ETA asked fortalks, the Spanish government rejected the request.The media<strong>to</strong>r must never appear <strong>to</strong> be rewarding violence. Forinstance, do not give the impression <strong>that</strong> violence has succeeded ingenerating a concession. Even if an act <strong>of</strong> violence has, in fact, spurred aconcession, the announcement <strong>of</strong> <strong>that</strong> concession should be delayed aslong as possible so <strong>that</strong> the causal connection is not obvious.87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!