22Intensive search studyOn 18 August, 132 dead birds were counted <strong>on</strong> transects within <strong>the</strong> 25 ha study area <strong>on</strong> OldWives Lake, resulting in an estimate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 3,300 carcasses (132 carcasses/ha) for <strong>the</strong> entire studyarea. Of <strong>the</strong> 59 marked carcasses placed arbitrarily within <strong>the</strong> study plot, 36 (61%) werecollected during <strong>the</strong> subsequent clean-up <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> entire area. A total <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2,477 carcasses wascollected by <strong>the</strong> clean-up crew over 13 hours, involving 5.5 hrs <strong>on</strong> 18 August <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 7.5 hrs <strong>on</strong> 19August. Based <strong>on</strong> a carcass pickup rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 61% <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2,477 carcasses retrieved, <strong>the</strong> total number<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> carcasses <strong>on</strong> this study area was estimated at 4,060 (700 higher than <strong>the</strong> estimate derived from<strong>the</strong> transects). If we use <strong>the</strong> lower estimate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 3,300 carcasses <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> assume that 39% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> carcasseswere missed, <strong>the</strong>n an estimated 1,287 carcasses (51 carcasses/ha) remained <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> study area.On 28 August, 600 new carcasses were estimated to be present <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> study area, based <strong>on</strong>transect counts. Using an airboat, a three-pers<strong>on</strong> crew collected a total <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 604 birds overapproximately six hours <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> found 10 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 30 marked carcasses (33.3%). They also found twocarcasses that had been marked 10 days previously. Using a correcti<strong>on</strong> factor <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> three, <strong>the</strong>number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> carcasses in <strong>the</strong> study plot was estimated to be 1,812, or 72.5 carcasses/ha. This totalshould reflect <strong>the</strong> number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> carcasses left after <strong>the</strong> first clean-up nine days earlier(approximately 1,300 carcasses) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> an additi<strong>on</strong>al 600 new carcasses, based <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> estimatederived from transects. This value <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1,900 is very close to <strong>the</strong> estimate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> approximately 1,800,which was derived from <strong>the</strong> number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> carcasses collected during <strong>the</strong> clean-up multiplied by <strong>the</strong>correcti<strong>on</strong> factor <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> three. Many carcasses left <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> study area over <strong>the</strong> previous nine dayswould be lost due to complete decompositi<strong>on</strong>. Based <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> observati<strong>on</strong> that <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>e in threecarcasses was found in this sec<strong>on</strong>d trial, approximately 1,200 carcasses (2 x 604) remained <strong>on</strong><strong>the</strong> 25 ha study plot. This equates to a density <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 48 carcasses/ha, which is very similar to thatobserved in <strong>the</strong> first trial (51 carcasses/ha), when initial carcass densities were much higher, aswas <strong>the</strong> proporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> carcasses found (61%).CONCLUSIONSAlthough carcass clean-up operati<strong>on</strong>s during this study were typical <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> past resp<strong>on</strong>ses to avianbotulism outbreaks, <strong>the</strong> level <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> effort applied was much greater than in <strong>the</strong> past in most cases.Yet, less than half <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> birds dying <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> botulism were actually retrieved. This was likely due topoor visibility <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> carcasses within st<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> emergent vegetati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> high cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> clean-up.Wetl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s with approximately 200-600 ha <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> emergent vegetati<strong>on</strong> had carcass pickup efficiencies<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 25-45%. The highest recovery (45%) <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> marked carcasses occurred <strong>on</strong> Paysen Lake, a 445 hawetl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> with very intensive clean-up efforts <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1.04 boat hrs/ha over <strong>the</strong> durati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong>outbreak, at a cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> ~C$117.00/ha. In spite <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong>se efforts, an average <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1.3 carcasses/haremained <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> wetl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> over <strong>the</strong> summer; focally, <strong>the</strong>se densities would have been much higher.These results are comparable to those <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Cliplef <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Wobeser (1993), who reported that 32% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>marked carcasses were found during routine botulism clean-up operati<strong>on</strong>s using an airboat. In<strong>the</strong>ir study, marked carcasses were placed <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> wetl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong>e day prior to clean-up <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong>experiment was repeated twice without <strong>the</strong> opportunity for repeated searches <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> area over
23time. Our experiment differed in that we marked carcasses at regular intervals throughout <strong>the</strong>summer <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> m<strong>on</strong>itored <strong>the</strong> proporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> marked carcasses found over <strong>the</strong> course <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> entireclean-up. In spite <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> percepti<strong>on</strong> that <strong>the</strong> clean-up efforts were more intense due to c<strong>on</strong>tinuoussearches <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> lake, <strong>the</strong> proporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> carcasses found was similar to previous reports.Intensive clean-up <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> well defined areas has <strong>the</strong> potential to improve pickup rates. Although weachieved a pickup rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 61% under <strong>the</strong>se c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, 51 carcasses/ha still remained after cleanup,likely because <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> high initial density <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> carcasses <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> heavy vegetati<strong>on</strong> in <strong>the</strong> area.Ano<strong>the</strong>r thorough clean-up <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> area found <strong>on</strong>ly 33% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> marked carcasses, with 48carcasses/ha remaining. On both occasi<strong>on</strong>s, <strong>the</strong> clean-up crew thought <strong>the</strong>y had thoroughlysearched <strong>the</strong> area even though <strong>the</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>d search took half <strong>the</strong> time. The fact that similar carcassdensities remained after each search suggests that searcher fatigue may play a role in achievingbetter detecti<strong>on</strong> rates.Scavenging appears to play an insignificant role in carcass removal during large botulismoutbreaks that occur in heavily vegetated wetl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s. In three <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> n<strong>on</strong>-clean-up wetl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s, whereradio-marked carcasses were placed, n<strong>on</strong>e were removed by scavengers <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> all developedmaggots <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> decomposed (Table 3). In o<strong>the</strong>r lakes, where carcass density was lower as a result<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> clean-up efforts <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> low levels <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> botulism mortality, scavenging rates varied from 0-13%.Scavenging appeared to be promoted by low carcass densities <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> higher carcass visibility,which resulted from light vegetati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> expanses <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> open or thinly vegetated shorelines.Coyotes, raptors, crows <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> o<strong>the</strong>r scavengers were frequently observed when shorelines werebeing searched for carcasses.Rates <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> maggot development <strong>on</strong> radio-marked carcasses revealed that carcasses took an average<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> six days to develop to <strong>the</strong> stage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> most intense fly larvae activity. Even a few carcassesoccurring <strong>on</strong> a botulism-pr<strong>on</strong>e wetl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> have <strong>the</strong> potential to precipitate an outbreak, becausesediment from wetl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s with a history <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> avian botulism are likely to c<strong>on</strong>tain spores <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> type C C.botulinum (Wobeser et al. 1987) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 60-100% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> carcasses <strong>on</strong> wetl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s during our studyproduced botulism toxin (Part VI; T. Bollinger, unpublished data), which is similar to previouslyreported rates <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> toxin development (Haagsma et al. 1972; Duncan <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Jensen 1976). To preventoutbreaks <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong>se wetl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s, regular searches would need to occur at least every four to six daysto prevent carcasses from developing maggots. Waterbird mortality comm<strong>on</strong>ly occurs <strong>on</strong>wetl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s due to such causes as inclement wea<strong>the</strong>r <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> hailstorms (Stout <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Cornwell 1976), aswell as disease <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> trauma affecting juveniles in nesting col<strong>on</strong>ies (Part V; Soos <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Wobeser2006). Intensive searches <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> clean-up <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> entire wetl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s would need to occur approximately 10times over <strong>the</strong> course <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> summer, to ensure that <strong>the</strong>se periodic or low-level occurrencemortality events do not escalate into large botulism outbreaks.Carcass clean-up <strong>on</strong> large, vegetated wetl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s was largely unsuccessful. Only 7% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> carcasseswere removed from Whitewater Lake, an 8,200 ha wetl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> which 4,500 ha are heavilyvegetated. Effective clean-up was not possible, due to <strong>the</strong> large area <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> vegetated wetl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> to besearched <strong>on</strong> a regular basis <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> high cost <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> doing so. Based <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> our intensiveclean-up study, approximately ½ hr/ha would be required to find 50-60% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> carcasses which,
- Page 1: Ecology an
- Page 4 and 5: iiThe model of bot
- Page 6 and 7: ivTABLE OF CONTENTSEXECUTIVE SUMMAR
- Page 8 and 9: 2Research from the 1970s supported
- Page 10 and 11: 4(Coburn and Quort
- Page 12 and 13: 6could potentially serve as substra
- Page 14 and 15: 8additional lakes and</stro
- Page 16 and 17: 10challenge because management assu
- Page 18 and 19: 12Rocke TE, Bollinger TK. 2007. <st
- Page 20 and 21: 14Table 1. Names and</stron
- Page 22 and 23: 16PART IEFFICACY OF CARCASS CLEAN-U
- Page 24 and 25: 18Our objectives were to determine:
- Page 26 and 27: 20marked carcasses potentially avai
- Page 30 and 31: 24if extrapolated to Whitewater Lak
- Page 32 and 33: 26Table 1. Characteristics
- Page 34 and 35: 28Table 3. Number of</stron
- Page 36 and 37: 30Table 5. Estimates of</st
- Page 38 and 39: Figure 2. Map of W
- Page 40 and 41: Figure 4. Variation of</str
- Page 42 and 43: 36PART IISURVIVAL OF RADIO-MARKED M
- Page 44 and 45: 38two lakes were subjected to carca
- Page 46 and 47: 40NecropsiesDead birds were include
- Page 48 and 49: 42were right censored. One hundred
- Page 50 and 51: 44design, possibly with a treatment
- Page 52 and 53: 46Rocke TE, Bollinger TK. 2007. <st
- Page 54 and 55: 48Table 2. Models used to assess ef
- Page 56 and 57: 50Table 4. Models used to evaluate
- Page 58 and 59: 52INTRODUCTIONMaggot-laden carcasse
- Page 60 and 61: 54among categories after creating a
- Page 62 and 63: 56LITERATURE CITEDBurnham KP, Ander
- Page 64 and 65: 58Table 2. Candida
- Page 66 and 67: 60PART IVLATE-SUMMER SURVIVAL OF MA
- Page 68 and 69: 62In each year of
- Page 70 and 71: 64Recovery rate comparisons - 1999D
- Page 72 and 73: 66between the present study <strong
- Page 74 and 75: 68Table 1. Number of</stron
- Page 76 and 77: 70Table 3. Logistic analyses evalua
- Page 78 and 79:
72Table 5. Direct recovery rates <s
- Page 80 and 81:
741210ControlBotulism</stro
- Page 82 and 83:
761614ControlBotulism</stro
- Page 84 and 85:
78INTRODUCTIONAvian</strong
- Page 86 and 87:
80(GPS) receivers (eTrex Venture, e
- Page 88 and 89:
82mortality rate was calculated by
- Page 90 and 91:
84samples from FG carcasses collect
- Page 92 and 93:
86outbreaks in waterfowl (Table 4;
- Page 94 and 95:
88birds and toxic
- Page 96 and 97:
90LITERATURE CITEDBall G, Bollinger
- Page 98 and 99:
92Williamson JL, Rocke TE, Aiken JM
- Page 100 and 101:
94Table 2. Species composition <str
- Page 102 and 103:
96Table 4. Estimates of</st
- Page 104 and 105:
98iiviiiii1 0 1 2 km1 0 1 21 0 1 21
- Page 106 and 107:
100PART VIVARIABILITY OF TYPE C CLO
- Page 108 and 109:
102seasonal wetland</strong
- Page 110 and 111:
104clinical signs of</stron
- Page 112 and 113:
106RESULTSThe proportion of
- Page 114 and 115:
108sediments in basins of</
- Page 116 and 117:
110Williamson JL, Rocke TE, Aiken J
- Page 118 and 119:
112Chaplin, SK botulism 3/5 (60) 1/
- Page 120 and 121:
114Table 3. Annual and</str
- Page 122 and 123:
116MAIN CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDAT
- Page 124 and 125:
Recommendation 8:The model
- Page 126 and 127:
120APPENDIX 1AVIAN BOTULISM IN ALBE
- Page 128 and 129:
122July 15, 2002ISBN: 0-7785-0962-1
- Page 130 and 131:
1242BackgroundMunro (1927) provides
- Page 132 and 133:
1264SUMMARY OF ALBERTA BOTULISM OUT
- Page 134 and 135:
128Moyles, D. 1989. Avian</
- Page 136 and 137:
13081) 1980 (Calverley 1980)Appendi
- Page 138 and 139:
1321010) 1990 (F&W files)LakeDetect
- Page 140 and 141:
134123 probable blue-green algal po
- Page 142 and 143:
136APPENDIX 2EXPOSURE OF MALLARD DU
- Page 144 and 145:
138Toxin was administered orally us
- Page 146:
140LITERATURE CITEDCarmichael WW, B