- Page 1: Ecology an
- Page 4 and 5: iiThe model of bot
- Page 6 and 7: ivTABLE OF CONTENTSEXECUTIVE SUMMAR
- Page 8 and 9: 2Research from the 1970s supported
- Page 10 and 11: 4(Coburn and Quort
- Page 12 and 13: 6could potentially serve as substra
- Page 14 and 15: 8additional lakes and</stro
- Page 16 and 17: 10challenge because management assu
- Page 18 and 19: 12Rocke TE, Bollinger TK. 2007. <st
- Page 20 and 21: 14Table 1. Names and</stron
- Page 22 and 23: 16PART IEFFICACY OF CARCASS CLEAN-U
- Page 24 and 25: 18Our objectives were to determine:
- Page 26 and 27: 20marked carcasses potentially avai
- Page 28 and 29: 22Intensive search studyOn 18 Augus
- Page 30 and 31: 24if extrapolated to Whitewater Lak
- Page 32 and 33: 26Table 1. Characteristics
- Page 34 and 35: 28Table 3. Number of</stron
- Page 38 and 39: Figure 2. Map of W
- Page 40 and 41: Figure 4. Variation of</str
- Page 42 and 43: 36PART IISURVIVAL OF RADIO-MARKED M
- Page 44 and 45: 38two lakes were subjected to carca
- Page 46 and 47: 40NecropsiesDead birds were include
- Page 48 and 49: 42were right censored. One hundred
- Page 50 and 51: 44design, possibly with a treatment
- Page 52 and 53: 46Rocke TE, Bollinger TK. 2007. <st
- Page 54 and 55: 48Table 2. Models used to assess ef
- Page 56 and 57: 50Table 4. Models used to evaluate
- Page 58 and 59: 52INTRODUCTIONMaggot-laden carcasse
- Page 60 and 61: 54among categories after creating a
- Page 62 and 63: 56LITERATURE CITEDBurnham KP, Ander
- Page 64 and 65: 58Table 2. Candida
- Page 66 and 67: 60PART IVLATE-SUMMER SURVIVAL OF MA
- Page 68 and 69: 62In each year of
- Page 70 and 71: 64Recovery rate comparisons - 1999D
- Page 72 and 73: 66between the present study <strong
- Page 74 and 75: 68Table 1. Number of</stron
- Page 76 and 77: 70Table 3. Logistic analyses evalua
- Page 78 and 79: 72Table 5. Direct recovery rates <s
- Page 80 and 81: 741210ControlBotulism</stro
- Page 82 and 83: 761614ControlBotulism</stro
- Page 84 and 85: 78INTRODUCTIONAvian</strong
- Page 86 and 87:
80(GPS) receivers (eTrex Venture, e
- Page 88 and 89:
82mortality rate was calculated by
- Page 90 and 91:
84samples from FG carcasses collect
- Page 92 and 93:
86outbreaks in waterfowl (Table 4;
- Page 94 and 95:
88birds and toxic
- Page 96 and 97:
90LITERATURE CITEDBall G, Bollinger
- Page 98 and 99:
92Williamson JL, Rocke TE, Aiken JM
- Page 100 and 101:
94Table 2. Species composition <str
- Page 102 and 103:
96Table 4. Estimates of</st
- Page 104 and 105:
98iiviiiii1 0 1 2 km1 0 1 21 0 1 21
- Page 106 and 107:
100PART VIVARIABILITY OF TYPE C CLO
- Page 108 and 109:
102seasonal wetland</strong
- Page 110 and 111:
104clinical signs of</stron
- Page 112 and 113:
106RESULTSThe proportion of
- Page 114 and 115:
108sediments in basins of</
- Page 116 and 117:
110Williamson JL, Rocke TE, Aiken J
- Page 118 and 119:
112Chaplin, SK botulism 3/5 (60) 1/
- Page 120 and 121:
114Table 3. Annual and</str
- Page 122 and 123:
116MAIN CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDAT
- Page 124 and 125:
Recommendation 8:The model
- Page 126 and 127:
120APPENDIX 1AVIAN BOTULISM IN ALBE
- Page 128 and 129:
122July 15, 2002ISBN: 0-7785-0962-1
- Page 130 and 131:
1242BackgroundMunro (1927) provides
- Page 132 and 133:
1264SUMMARY OF ALBERTA BOTULISM OUT
- Page 134 and 135:
128Moyles, D. 1989. Avian</
- Page 136 and 137:
13081) 1980 (Calverley 1980)Appendi
- Page 138 and 139:
1321010) 1990 (F&W files)LakeDetect
- Page 140 and 141:
134123 probable blue-green algal po
- Page 142 and 143:
136APPENDIX 2EXPOSURE OF MALLARD DU
- Page 144 and 145:
138Toxin was administered orally us
- Page 146:
140LITERATURE CITEDCarmichael WW, B