17.07.2015 Views

How to Evaluate - York Consulting

How to Evaluate - York Consulting

How to Evaluate - York Consulting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Oldham and Rochdale HMREvaluation Techniques “<strong>How</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Evaluate</strong>”1 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW“<strong>How</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Evaluate</strong>”1.1 <strong>York</strong> <strong>Consulting</strong> LLP (YCL) was asked <strong>to</strong> carry out an evaluation of theCohesion Counts projects and produce an Evaluation Techniques: “<strong>How</strong> To<strong>Evaluate</strong>” Guide in May 2009. The evaluation of the Cohesion Countsprojects was carried out from May 2009 <strong>to</strong> January 2010.1.2 This “<strong>How</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Evaluate</strong>” Guide provides an overview of the projects involvedin the Cohesion Counts Evaluation and provides guidelines, developed fromYCL’s experience as evalua<strong>to</strong>rs, for projects or programmes <strong>to</strong> undertaketheir own evaluation (Section 2). The guidelines aim <strong>to</strong> provide projects andprogrammes with the opportunity <strong>to</strong> reflect on how they could structuretheir own evaluation. The information provides helpful suggestions andhints on what evaluation should cover as well as things <strong>to</strong> watch out for.1.3 The guide also includes reflections on the successes and challengesexperienced through using the specific types of evaluation activity chosenfor the Cohesion Counts evaluation (Section 3). Some of the evaluationmethodologies used are outlined in Section 2, the examples and reflectionsgiven in Section 3 build on the methodology suggestions and offer somereal-life examples of how they were implemented and what lessons theevaluation team learnt.1.4 The findings from the evaluation activity were based on a quantitative andqualitative methodology which consisted of questionnaires, surveys, face<strong>to</strong>-faceand telephone consultations, mood boards, scenario testing, onlineblogs and forums, secondary and primary data. Those involved in theevaluation included funders, stakeholders, project deliverers, communitymembers and project participants.1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!