30.07.2015 Views

1 Milltown Park Subdivision Replat CITY ... - City of Sandpoint

1 Milltown Park Subdivision Replat CITY ... - City of Sandpoint

1 Milltown Park Subdivision Replat CITY ... - City of Sandpoint

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Commissioner Qualls inquired if the owner will commit to a time frame for completion<strong>of</strong> the bike path. Barta stated if they had the property from the RR they would start thebike path tomorrow. However the owners would not like to see a required completiondate on a recorded document. Barta stated the owner is willing to cooperate and do atemporary bike/pedestrian path through the property, but do not want to have acommitment on title for roads and paths.Commissioner Huisman inquired if an emergency access through Lot 9 could be abike/pedestrian path. Barta stated ultimately the bike path is not just on this site, thevision has always been to connect to the Fifth Avenue corridor and along Boyer Avenue.Commissioner Huisman stated she would like to see a safe alternative until that futureland is acquired, which would get bikes and pedestrians from Larch to the RR trackswithout going along Boyer Avenue. Barta stated he would put a hard path in and workwith the fire chief and make sure the access conforms.Commissioner Hyde-Bordenave inquired why the owner is so agreeable to accommodateCommissioner Huisman when she does not live near there and just does not want to ridealong Boyer Avenue. Mr. Barta stated the owner agreed a bike path would go throughthe property somewhere as development occurred. Commissioner Hyde-Bordenaveexpressed an issue with producing a bike path and then just blocking it when constructionoccurs.Staff Comments:Grimm advised the Commission this is an issue <strong>of</strong> letting <strong>of</strong> the horse out <strong>of</strong> the barn. Hestated the cold hard reality is that once this subdivision is approved it is very difficult forthe <strong>City</strong> to get roads and easements recorded. Grimm explained if this application isapproved the rest <strong>of</strong> the Lots can all develop even if Lot 10 does not. Grimm stated thepathway is not discretionary but a requirement. Grimm stated if development occurs andthe path or roads are not platted, then it is difficult for the <strong>City</strong> to get those dedicationslater from several different owners. Grimm stated there is more flexibility for thedeveloper to come in with a request to Vacate or Lot line adjustment.Commissioner Huisman stated it is difficult to see what the traffic needs will be withoutknowing how the Lots will be developed. Bramblee stated the Commission can conditionfinal rights <strong>of</strong> way be determined before final plat approval.Commissioner Rognstad clarified Chestnut and the future Sixth Avenue will bedeveloped as full streets.Grimm stated the Commission cannot condition additional open space unless there isfindings <strong>of</strong> fact this subdivision will have an extraordinary impact on parks that impactfees do not cover.Grimm stated the Commission must look at the plat as it is proposed and not considerspecific future development as there is no guarantee any discussed development mayoccur.Page 5 <strong>of</strong> 15 <strong>Sandpoint</strong> Planning Commission Minutes January 3, 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!