30.07.2015 Views

1 Milltown Park Subdivision Replat CITY ... - City of Sandpoint

1 Milltown Park Subdivision Replat CITY ... - City of Sandpoint

1 Milltown Park Subdivision Replat CITY ... - City of Sandpoint

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Bramblee advised the Commission it has the option to require a 25 foot landscape areaalong the proposed double frontage Lots to mitigate the design <strong>of</strong> double frontages. TheCommission discussed double frontage Lots and possible development options and trafficflows.Commissioner Hyde-Bordenave inquired if Maple Street can be a possible access for thedevelopment and if any traffic studies have been completed. Public Works DirectorKody Van Dyk stated the only traffic studies completed where done as part <strong>of</strong> the UrbanArea <strong>of</strong> Transportation in 2006 and the <strong>Milltown</strong> site was assumed to be fully developed.Van Dyk stated he would like Boyer Avenue to be widened. Van Dyk stated Maple is anunapproved road way which a part was vacated. He stated his preference would be tocombine the driveway <strong>of</strong> Super1 with Sixth Ave and have Sixth Avenue continue throughthe project. Van Dyk stated he would not allow the driveway for Super1 and anotheraccess road to be adjacent to each other. He stated it would be a 120 feet wide accessonto Larch and would not allow work.Van Dyk stated Maple could be an improved access for traffic, but not pedestrianimprovements because it is not wide enough. Van Dyk stated his preference would be tohave the <strong>Milltown</strong> developers work with Super1 to combine the access with the newSixth Avenue road. He stated another thought would be to close the Super 1 access andhave one entrance into the complex further north. Van Dyk stated Maple Street wouldnot be a viable option.Van Dyk advised the Commission he would prefer the future Sixth Avenue be plattedfrom Larch to Chestnut at this time. He stated the <strong>City</strong> cannot go backwards and get theright <strong>of</strong> way again, in addition it would allow a bike path on one side <strong>of</strong> the street throughthe site now. In the event the RR land is acquired the path can be moved. Van Dykstated the access through Lot 9 can be an easement. Van Dyk stated he can work with thedeveloper to defer improvements, but it is important the Development Agreement bevetted with the <strong>City</strong> Attorney to ensure infrastructure improvements are completed in thefuture. Van Dyk stated he would prefer the widening <strong>of</strong> Boyer Avenue happen at thesame time for Lots 7,8 and 9. He stated development <strong>of</strong> Lot 6 will trigger the remainingwidening.Chairman Herrera stated it is clear the Commission can require platted right <strong>of</strong> way buthow does the bike path correspond. Van Dyk stated requiring the developer to plat SixthAvenue will guarantee the bike path because the sewer has to go in for development <strong>of</strong>Lot 10. Van Dyk stated it would be only temporary until a full street is developed, butthe Commission can require a hard surface.Van Dyk stated water, sewer, storm water, pathway and street drawings will have to besubmitted and approved by his department.Commissioner Fragoso inquired if Van Dyk would prefer the double frontage lots beaccessed through Boyer or Sixth Avenue. Van Dyk stated for traffic purposes accesswould be better <strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> Sixth. He stated with the widening, it may not be much <strong>of</strong> aproblem but would be better <strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> Sixth.Page 6 <strong>of</strong> 15 <strong>Sandpoint</strong> Planning Commission Minutes January 3, 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!