24.09.2015 Views

Preface

After culture complete

After culture complete

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

11<br />

shall examine how the New Order régime in Indonesia has appealed to<br />

culture as an articulating idea.<br />

Instead of accepting their idealizations of cultural methods of research,<br />

how do anthropologists actually go about studying culture? What do they<br />

take as the object of study? How do they relate to it? And how do they<br />

infer culture from the object? Once again, I shall draw upon<br />

anthropological work on Indonesia. It so happens that one of the most<br />

celebrated anthropological exponents of culture, Clifford Geertz, has done<br />

most of his analyses on Indonesian materials. So just how do you do a<br />

cultural analysis?<br />

Third, what is not culture? What is it that is opposed, or antagonistic, to<br />

culture? On all but a lunatically encompassing account of culture, there<br />

must be something else in the world, to which culture relates either as a<br />

competing or antagonistic set of processes or as an alternative explanatory<br />

frame of reference. Put another way, what is it that culture keeps at bay?<br />

What threatens the world if culture falters? What is displaced, silenced,<br />

denied in an appeal to culture?<br />

Introducing culture<br />

First, though, how have anthropologists imagined culture? What sort of<br />

object of study is it? I shall address this question by reviewing the work of<br />

the leading advocate of an interpretive theory of culture, Clifford Geertz – a<br />

theory coincidentally developed largely on Indonesian materials. As<br />

Geertz has famously remarked<br />

what we call our data are really our own constructions of other people’s<br />

constructions of what they and their compatriots are up to (1973c: 9)<br />

Cultural analysis is then heterogeneous and hierarchical. Before we<br />

have even begun the analysis and interpretation, our raw materials involve<br />

scholars’ interpretations of the interpretations of their lives by the subjects<br />

of study.<br />

What exactly then is the relationship between the anthropologist’s and<br />

the participants’ interpretations on this account? 10 The question is<br />

important because cultural analysis claims to be able to access the ‘native’s<br />

10<br />

The study of culture in some form concerns language and literature specialists and<br />

cultural studies’ scholars, for instance, as much as it does anthropologists. The theoretical<br />

problems of culture are similar however.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!