Research on CALL and Distance Learning: A Briefly Annotated ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Brandl, K. (2002). Integrating internet-based reading materials into the foreign language curriculum: From teacher-to student-centered approaches. Language Learning & Technology, 6 (3), 87-107. (http://llt.msu.edu) Keywords: reading, websites Summary: Provides recommendations for lesson planning based on internet readings Brantmeier, C. (2003). Technology and second language reading at the university level: Informed instructors’ perceptions. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 3 (3). Keywords: teacher training Summary: Surveys 10 students in a second language acquisition/CALL course to gauge their opinions of using CALL Brantmeier, C. (2006). Advanced L2 learners and reading placement: Self-assessment, CBT, and subsequent performance. System, 34 (1), 15-35. Keywords: assessment, reading, Spanish Summary: Details results of an online placement test and self-assessment instrument; finds self-assessment to be ineffective predictor for appropriate placement decision or future course success Branz-Spall, A. M., Rosenthal, R., & Wright, A. (2003). Children of the road: Migrant students, our nation’s most mobile population. The Journal of Negro Education, 72 (1), 55-62. Keywords: English, television, laptops, distance learning Summary: Details educational television and a project that gives laptops to migrant children Braun, S. (2005). From pedagogically relevant corpora to authentic language learning contents. ReCALL, 17 (1), 47-64. Keywords: corpora Summary: Argues that many corpora are of limited pedagogical use; presents ideas for more pedagogically oriented corpora Brett, D. (2004). Computer generated feedback on vowel production by learners of English as a second language. ReCALL, 16 (1), 103-113. Keywords: speaking, English, phonetics software Summary: Details the use of phonetics software for teaching vowels to Italian learners Brett, P. (2000). Integrating multimedia into the business English curriculum: A case study. English for Specific Purposes, 19 (3), 269-290. Keywords: listening, English, CD-ROM, English for specific purposes Summary: Details the use of two CD-ROMs for undergraduate business students Brierley, B., & Kemble, I. (Eds.). (1991). Computers as a tool in language teaching. New York: Ellis Horwood. Keywords: CALL methods Summary: Edited volume covering a variety of applications of computers for language learning purposes Britain, S., & Liber, O. (1999). A framework for pedagogical evaluation of virtual learning environments, JISC technology applications (JTAP). Retrieved November 28, 2005, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/jtap-041.doc Keywords: CALL evaluation Summary: Provides criteria for evaluating CALL materials 14
Britsch, S. J. (2005). But what did they learn? Clearing third spaces in virtual dialogues with children. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 5 (2), 99-130. Keywords: English, email Summary: Details adult-child email correspondence related to curricular/content knowledge; questions suitability of medium to discuss content, while supportive of email medium to support writing skills Brücher, K. H. (1993). On the performance and efficiency of authoring programs in CALL. CALICO Journal, 11 (2), 5–20. (https://www.calico.org/p-5-CALICO Journal.html) Keywords: materials development Summary: Discusses various aspects of CALL programming and materials development Buckland, D. (2000). Putting achievement first: Managing and leading ICT in the MFL department (CILT Infotech series No. 5). London: CILT. Keywords: CALL Summary: Details how electronic resources can be incorporated into the classroom Bull, S. (1994). Learning languages: Implications for student modelling in ICALL. ReCALL, 6 (1), 34-39. Keywords: materials development Summary: Argues for better student models in CALL materials design Bump, J. (1990). Radical changes in class discussion using networked computers. Computers and the Humanities, 24 (1), 49-65. Keywords: synchronous CMC Summary: Surveys students using synchronous CMC in classroom discussion and analyzes other classroom data; concludes that advantages of CMC far outweigh disadvantages Burston, J. (1998). From CD-ROM to the WWW: Coming full circle. CALICO Journal, 15 (1-3), 67-74. (https://www.calico.org/p-5-CALICO Journal.html) Keywords: French, CD-ROM, internet Summary: Details challenges and solutions in adapting a CD-ROM to the web; concludes CD-ROM/internet hybrids are best Burston, J. (2001). Computer-mediated feedback in composition correction. CALICO Journal, 19 (1), 37-50. (https://www.calico.org/p-5-CALICO Journal.html) Keywords: writing, French, software Summary: Explains how an annotation program can be used to give feedback in L2 writing Burston, J. (2001). Exploiting the potential of a computer-based grammar checker in conjunction with self-monitoring strategies with advanced level students of French. CALICO Journal, 18 (3), 499-515. (https://www.calico.org/p-5-CALICO Journal.html) Keywords: grammar, French, grammar checker Summary: Details use of a grammar checker in French L2 writing course Burston, J. (2003). Proving IT works. CALICO Journal, 20 (2), 219-226. (https://www.calico.org/p-5-CALICO Journal.html) Keywords: CALL evaluation Summary: Provides criteria for evaluating CALL materials; argues that evaluations must become more pedagogically oriented and less technologically oriented 15
Page 1 and 2: Research on CALL a
Page 3 and 4: Abrate, J., & Bowling, T. (2000). P
Page 5 and 6: Appel, C., & Mullen, T. (2002). A n
Page 7 and 8: Bangs, P. (2002). Authoring, pedago
Page 9 and 10: Bednar, A. K., & Charles, M. T. (19
Page 11 and 12: Biesenbach-Lucas, S. (2005). Commun
Page 13: Böhlke, O. (2003). Adjective produ
Page 17 and 18: Cartes-Enriquez, N., Rodriguez, M.
Page 19 and 20: Chapelle, C. A. (2004). Technology
Page 21 and 22: Chun, D. M., & Payne, J. S. (2004).
Page 23 and 24: Corbeil, G. (2007). Using the Frenc
Page 25 and 26: Cziko, G. A., & Park, S. (2003). In
Page 27 and 28: Davies, G. (2003b). ICT and modern
Page 29 and 30: Delmonte, R. (2003). Linguistic kno
Page 31 and 32: Dooly, M. (2007). Joining forces: P
Page 33 and 34: Egbert, J., & Yang, Y.-F. D. (2004)
Page 35 and 36: Farmer, R., & Gruba, P. (2006). Tow
Page 37 and 38: Finkbeiner, C. (2001). One and all
Page 39 and 40: Fuentes, A. C. (2004). The use of c
Page 41 and 42: Gillespie, J. H., & Barr, J. D. (20
Page 43 and 44: Gray, C., Hagger-Vaughan, L., Pilki
Page 45 and 46: Hager, M., Rieper, A., Schmitt, E.,
Page 47 and 48: Hardy, I. M., & Moore, J. L. (2004)
Page 49 and 50: Hemard, D., & Cushion, S. (2000). F
Page 51 and 52: Holmberg, B. (2003). A theory of di
Page 53 and 54: Huifen, L., Tsuiping, C., & Dwyer,
Page 55 and 56: Jancewicz, B., & MacKenzie, M. (200
Page 57 and 58: Jones, L. C., & Plass, J. L. (2002)
Page 59 and 60: Kawai, G., & Hirose, K. (2000). Tea
Page 61 and 62: Kitajima, R. (2002). Enhancing high
Page 63 and 64: Kupetz, R., & Ziegenmeyer, B. (2005
Page 65 and 66:
Larson, J. W. (2000). Testing oral
Page 67 and 68:
Lee, L. (2005). Using web-based ins
Page 69 and 70:
Lewis, T. (2006). When teaching is
Page 71 and 72:
Littlemore, J. (2001). Learner auto
Page 73 and 74:
Luke, C. L., & Britten, J. S. (2007
Page 75 and 76:
Martin, B. (2006). Using a tablet P
Page 77 and 78:
Menzel, W., Herron, D., Moton, R.,
Page 79 and 80:
Mills, N., Herron, C., & Cole, S. P
Page 81 and 82:
Muniandy, A. V. A. (2002). Electron
Page 83 and 84:
Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C., & Strik,
Page 85 and 86:
Nikolova, O. R. (2004). Effects of
Page 87 and 88:
O’Hara, K., & Sellen, A. (1997).
Page 89 and 90:
Parks, S., Huot, D., Hamers, J., &
Page 91 and 92:
Peterson, M. (2001). MOOs and secon
Page 93 and 94:
Potts, D. (2005). Pedagogy, purpose
Page 95 and 96:
Reinhardt, J., & Nelson, B. K. (200
Page 97 and 98:
Rogerson-Revell, P. (2005). A hybri
Page 99 and 100:
Saba, P. (2005). Critical issues in
Page 101 and 102:
Sawaki, Y. (2001). Comparability of
Page 103 and 104:
Seferoglu, G. (2005). Improving stu
Page 105 and 106:
Shaughnessy, M. (2003). CALL, comme
Page 107 and 108:
Simpson, J. (2005). Learning electr
Page 109 and 110:
Smith, B. (2005). The relationship
Page 111 and 112:
Sotillo, S. (2005). Corrective feed
Page 113 and 114:
Stevenson, M., Schoonen, R., & de G
Page 115 and 116:
Sullivan, K., & Lindgren, E. (2002)
Page 117 and 118:
Teeler, D., & Gray, P. (2000). How
Page 119 and 120:
Torlakovic, E., & Deugo, D. (2004).
Page 121 and 122:
Tsubota, Y., Dantsuji, M., & Kawaha
Page 123 and 124:
Verdugo, D. R., & Belmonte, I. A. (
Page 125 and 126:
Wade-Stein, D. & Kintsch, E. (2004)
Page 127 and 128:
Warner, C. N. (2004). It’s just a
Page 129 and 130:
Web-based Education Commission .(20
Page 131 and 132:
Winkler, B. (2001). English learner
Page 133 and 134:
Young, S., & Bloothooft, G. (Eds.).
Page 135:
Zic Fuchs, M. (2002-2003). Communic
show all

Research on CALL and Distance Learning: A Briefly Annotated ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?