Research on CALL and Distance Learning: A Briefly Annotated ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Felix, U. (2005). What do meta-analyses tell us about CALL effectiveness? ReCALL, 17 (2), 269-288. Keywords: Meta-analysis Summary: A meta-analysis of several hundred CALL studies; strongest positive results noted for L1 spelling, reading, and writing Feng, C., Ogata, H., Yano, Y. (2000). Mark-up-based writing error analysis model in an on-line classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13 (1), 79-97. Keywords: writing, grammar, Japanese, grammar checker, corpora Summary: Describes an error-checking program that detects and provides feedback for a variety of morphological errors in Japanese writing and allows for creation of learner corpora Fernandez Carballo-Calero, M. V. (2001). The EFL teacher and the introduction of multimedia in the classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 14 (1), 3-14. Keywords: teacher training, multimedia Summary: Emphasizes teacher training and adaptability in incorporating CALL into the classroom Fernandez-Garcia, M., & Arbelaiz, A. M. (2003). Learners’ interactions: A comparison of oral and computer-assisted written conversations. ReCALL, 15 (1), 113-136. Keywords: CMC, negotiation Summary: Compares negotiation in NS-NS, NNS-NNS, and NS-NNS oral and written interactions Fernández-García, M., & Martínez-Arbelaiz, A. (2002). Negotiation of meaning in nonnative speaker-nonnative speaker synchronous discussions. CALICO Journal, 19 (2), 279-294. (https://www.calico.org/p-5-CALICO Journal.html) Keywords: grammar, Spanish, chat Summary: Examines negotiation of meaning in chat discussions; notes extensive use of first language by students Ferney, D., & Waller, S. (2001). Reflections on multimedia design criteria for the international language learning community. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 14 (2), 145-168. Keywords: materials development, CD-ROM Summary: Examines design criteria in multimedia CD-ROMs Feuerman, K., Marshall, C., Newman, D., & Rypa, M. (1987). The CALLE project. CALICO Journal, 4 (1), 25-34. (https://www.calico.org/p-5-CALICO Journal.html) Keywords: grammar, Spanish, chat Summary: Describes an early project that incorporated natural language processing into chat sessions to diagnose grammar errors Feustle, J. A., Jr. (2001). Extending the reach of the classroom with Web-based programs. Hispania, 84 (4), 837-849. Keywords: Spanish, internet Summary: Details use of various course management programs to enhance teaching Fidler, M. (2004). Reading and studying culture with electronic materials. Canadian Slavonic Papers, 46 (1-2), 83-99. Keywords: reading, culture, Czech, hypertext Summary: Discusses how to remedy student misconceptions resulting from a written online Czech corpus 36
Finkbeiner, C. (2001). One and all in CALL? Learner-moderator-researcher. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 14 (3-4), 339-361. Keywords: teacher training Summary: Argues for CALL's central role in training teachers to be good learners, moderators, and researchers Fiori, M. L. (2005). The development of grammatical competence through synchronous computer-mediated communication. CALICO Journal, 22 (3), 567-602. (https://www.calico.org/p-5-CALICO Journal.html) Keywords: grammar, Spanish, chat Summary: Benefits of form- and meaning-focused chat versus. meaning-only focused chat are discussed Fitze, M. (2006). Discourse and participation in ESL face-to-face and written electronic conferences. Language Learning & Technology, 10 (1), 67-86. (http://llt.msu.edu) Keywords: discourse, vocabulary, English, conferencing program Summary: Greater lexical range displayed during written conferences than oral, even when interactional discourse controlled for; discusses egalitarian discourse distribution Fitzpatrick, A., & Davies, G. (Eds.). (2003). The impact of information and communications technologies on the teaching of foreign languages and on the role of teachers of foreign languages. Luxembourg: EC Directorate General of Education and Culture. Keywords: information communication technology overview Summary: Presents overview of information communication technology in the UK. Fleming, S., & Hiple, D. (2004). Distance education to distributed learning: Multiple formats and technologies in language instruction. CALICO Journal, 22 (1), 63-82. (https://www.calico.org/p-5-CALICO Journal.html) Keywords: interactive television, internet, distance learning, hybrid Summary: Details how language proficiency level of a course may determine the most suitable CALL material(s) and media Forester, L. (2002). Implications of research on human memory for CALL design. CALICO Journal, 20 (1), 99-126. (https://www.calico.org/p-5-CALICO Journal.html) Keywords: materials development Summary: Discusses basics of human memory and cognition in relation to various CALL products Foster, J. Q., Harrell, L. F., & Raizen, E. (2004). The Hebrewer: A Web-based inflection generator. CALICO Journal, 21 (3), 523-540. (https://www.calico.org/p-5-CALICO Journal.html) Keywords: materials development, orthography, Hebrew Summary: Discusses a web-based program used to generate Hebrew characters for use in CALL materials Fotos, S., & Browne, C. (Eds.). (2004). New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Keywords: edited volume Summary: covers various CALL methodologies, implementing CALL programs, and evaluating CALL Fox, M. (1998). Breaking down the distance barriers: Perceptions and practice in technologymediated distance language acquisition. ReCALL, 10 (1), 59-67. Keywords: distance learning Summary: Argues that research into CALL must be driven by examination of benefits to learner, and not just focus on human-computer interaction or human-human interaction via computer. 37
Page 1 and 2: Research on CALL a
Page 3 and 4: Abrate, J., & Bowling, T. (2000). P
Page 5 and 6: Appel, C., & Mullen, T. (2002). A n
Page 7 and 8: Bangs, P. (2002). Authoring, pedago
Page 9 and 10: Bednar, A. K., & Charles, M. T. (19
Page 11 and 12: Biesenbach-Lucas, S. (2005). Commun
Page 13 and 14: Böhlke, O. (2003). Adjective produ
Page 15 and 16: Britsch, S. J. (2005). But what did
Page 17 and 18: Cartes-Enriquez, N., Rodriguez, M.
Page 19 and 20: Chapelle, C. A. (2004). Technology
Page 21 and 22: Chun, D. M., & Payne, J. S. (2004).
Page 23 and 24: Corbeil, G. (2007). Using the Frenc
Page 25 and 26: Cziko, G. A., & Park, S. (2003). In
Page 27 and 28: Davies, G. (2003b). ICT and modern
Page 29 and 30: Delmonte, R. (2003). Linguistic kno
Page 31 and 32: Dooly, M. (2007). Joining forces: P
Page 33 and 34: Egbert, J., & Yang, Y.-F. D. (2004)
Page 35: Farmer, R., & Gruba, P. (2006). Tow
Page 39 and 40: Fuentes, A. C. (2004). The use of c
Page 41 and 42: Gillespie, J. H., & Barr, J. D. (20
Page 43 and 44: Gray, C., Hagger-Vaughan, L., Pilki
Page 45 and 46: Hager, M., Rieper, A., Schmitt, E.,
Page 47 and 48: Hardy, I. M., & Moore, J. L. (2004)
Page 49 and 50: Hemard, D., & Cushion, S. (2000). F
Page 51 and 52: Holmberg, B. (2003). A theory of di
Page 53 and 54: Huifen, L., Tsuiping, C., & Dwyer,
Page 55 and 56: Jancewicz, B., & MacKenzie, M. (200
Page 57 and 58: Jones, L. C., & Plass, J. L. (2002)
Page 59 and 60: Kawai, G., & Hirose, K. (2000). Tea
Page 61 and 62: Kitajima, R. (2002). Enhancing high
Page 63 and 64: Kupetz, R., & Ziegenmeyer, B. (2005
Page 65 and 66: Larson, J. W. (2000). Testing oral
Page 67 and 68: Lee, L. (2005). Using web-based ins
Page 69 and 70: Lewis, T. (2006). When teaching is
Page 71 and 72: Littlemore, J. (2001). Learner auto
Page 73 and 74: Luke, C. L., & Britten, J. S. (2007
Page 75 and 76: Martin, B. (2006). Using a tablet P
Page 77 and 78: Menzel, W., Herron, D., Moton, R.,
Page 79 and 80: Mills, N., Herron, C., & Cole, S. P
Page 81 and 82: Muniandy, A. V. A. (2002). Electron
Page 83 and 84: Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C., & Strik,
Page 85 and 86: Nikolova, O. R. (2004). Effects of
Page 87 and 88:
O’Hara, K., & Sellen, A. (1997).
Page 89 and 90:
Parks, S., Huot, D., Hamers, J., &
Page 91 and 92:
Peterson, M. (2001). MOOs and secon
Page 93 and 94:
Potts, D. (2005). Pedagogy, purpose
Page 95 and 96:
Reinhardt, J., & Nelson, B. K. (200
Page 97 and 98:
Rogerson-Revell, P. (2005). A hybri
Page 99 and 100:
Saba, P. (2005). Critical issues in
Page 101 and 102:
Sawaki, Y. (2001). Comparability of
Page 103 and 104:
Seferoglu, G. (2005). Improving stu
Page 105 and 106:
Shaughnessy, M. (2003). CALL, comme
Page 107 and 108:
Simpson, J. (2005). Learning electr
Page 109 and 110:
Smith, B. (2005). The relationship
Page 111 and 112:
Sotillo, S. (2005). Corrective feed
Page 113 and 114:
Stevenson, M., Schoonen, R., & de G
Page 115 and 116:
Sullivan, K., & Lindgren, E. (2002)
Page 117 and 118:
Teeler, D., & Gray, P. (2000). How
Page 119 and 120:
Torlakovic, E., & Deugo, D. (2004).
Page 121 and 122:
Tsubota, Y., Dantsuji, M., & Kawaha
Page 123 and 124:
Verdugo, D. R., & Belmonte, I. A. (
Page 125 and 126:
Wade-Stein, D. & Kintsch, E. (2004)
Page 127 and 128:
Warner, C. N. (2004). It’s just a
Page 129 and 130:
Web-based Education Commission .(20
Page 131 and 132:
Winkler, B. (2001). English learner
Page 133 and 134:
Young, S., & Bloothooft, G. (Eds.).
Page 135:
Zic Fuchs, M. (2002-2003). Communic
show all

Research on CALL and Distance Learning: A Briefly Annotated ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?