Research on CALL and Distance Learning: A Briefly Annotated ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Ernest, P., & Hopkins, J. (2006). Coordination and teacher development in an online learning environment. CALICO Journal, 23 (3), 551-568. (https://www.calico.org/p-5-CALICO Journal.html) Keywords: teacher training, English, distance learning Summary: Examines issues related to teacher training for online learning contexts Esch, E., & Zahner, C. (2000). The contribution of information and communication technology (ICT) to language learning environments or the mystery of the secret agent. ReCALL, 12 (1), 5-18. Keywords: materials development Summary: Argues that learners must be the key agents in the construction of new language learning environments EUROCALL. (2007). CALL bibliography. Retrieved August 13, 2007 from http://www.eurocalllanguages.org/resources/bibliograpy Keywords: CALL database Summary: Database of articles related to CALL compiled by Graham Davies Everett, D. R. (1998). Taking instruction online: The art of delivery (Report No. Ir-018-813). Washington, DC: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 421094) Keywords: online education Summary: Relates survey results from the beginning and end of an online course; offers suggestions for future teaching Ewing, M. C. (2000). Conversations of Indonesian language students on computer-mediated projects: Linguistic responsibility and control. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13 (4-5), 333-356. Keywords: grammar, discourse, Indonesian Summary: Production differences examined in grammar and discourse between students involved in web-based research projects and traditional classroom discourse Fallahkhair, S., Pemberton, L., & Griffiths, R. (2007). Development of a cross-platform ubiquitous language learning service via mobile phone and interactive television. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23 (4), 312-325. Keywords: listening, culture, vocabulary, English, interactive television, mobile phone Summary: Describes and evaluates the TAMALLE project, which combines interactive video input with personalized access to hypervisual text available through learner's mobile phone Fang, X., & Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and curricular reform in China: A case study. TESOL Quarterly, 38 (2), 301-323. Keywords: English Summary: Analyzes an attempt to introduce technology-based, project-oriented instruction in higher education in China; despite positive student reactions, cultural, and institutional barriers remain Farabaugh, R. (2007). ‘The isle is full of noises’: Using Wiki software to establish a discourse community in a Shakespeare classroom. Language Awareness, 16 (1), 41-56. Keywords: writing, English (L1), wiki software Summary: Favorable review of using wiki software in a Shakespeare course; benefits include creating an interactive writing environment and ability to create short writing assignments 34
Farmer, R., & Gruba, P. (2006). Towards model-driven end-user development in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19 (2-3), 149-191. Keywords: materials development, software Summary: Emphasizes need to involve teachers (end users) in the development cycle of CALL software Felix, U. (1999). Exploiting the Web for language teaching: Selected approaches. ReCALL, 11 (1), 30-37. Keywords: internet, product review Summary: Surveys and evaluates a variety of CALL products; argues that in some language/subject areas, resources are already so plentiful that best practices among them should be consolidated and energies focused on global collaboration Felix, U. (2001). Beyond Babel: Language learning online. Melbourne: Language Australia. Keywords: edited volume Summary: discusses current state of CALL Felix, U. (2001). The Web’s potential for language learning: The student’s perspective. ReCALL, 13 (1), 47-58. Keywords: websites, hybrid and distance learning Summary: Assesses student reactions to web-based learning; positives include time flexibility and wealth of information; negatives include lack of speaking practice and instructor oversight; significant differences across age and gender Felix, U. (2002). The Web as a vehicle for constructivist approaches in language teaching. ReCALL, 14 (1), 2-15. Keywords: internet Summary: Argues that web use is particularly suited for information gap and authentic project-oriented learning Felix, U. (2003). Teaching languages online: Deconstructing the myths. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19 (1), 118-138. Keywords: online learning Summary: Refutes common misconceptions regarding online learning Felix, U. (2004). A multivariate analysis of secondary students’ experience of Web-based language acquisition. ReCALL, 16 (1), 237-249. Keywords: CALL evaluation Summary: A qualitative evaluation of student reactions to web-based learning Felix, U. (2005). Analysing recent CALL effectiveness research-towards a common agenda. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18 (1-2), 1-32. Keywords: literature review Summary: Literature review of CALL topics 2000-2004; argues for developing a coherent research agenda Felix, U. (2005). E-learning pedagogy in the third millennium: The need for combining social and cognitive constructivist approaches. ReCALL, 17 (1), 85-100. Keywords: constructivism Summary: argues for constructivism as a means to mediate current social and educational issues 35
Page 1 and 2: Research on CALL a
Page 3 and 4: Abrate, J., & Bowling, T. (2000). P
Page 5 and 6: Appel, C., & Mullen, T. (2002). A n
Page 7 and 8: Bangs, P. (2002). Authoring, pedago
Page 9 and 10: Bednar, A. K., & Charles, M. T. (19
Page 11 and 12: Biesenbach-Lucas, S. (2005). Commun
Page 13 and 14: Böhlke, O. (2003). Adjective produ
Page 15 and 16: Britsch, S. J. (2005). But what did
Page 17 and 18: Cartes-Enriquez, N., Rodriguez, M.
Page 19 and 20: Chapelle, C. A. (2004). Technology
Page 21 and 22: Chun, D. M., & Payne, J. S. (2004).
Page 23 and 24: Corbeil, G. (2007). Using the Frenc
Page 25 and 26: Cziko, G. A., & Park, S. (2003). In
Page 27 and 28: Davies, G. (2003b). ICT and modern
Page 29 and 30: Delmonte, R. (2003). Linguistic kno
Page 31 and 32: Dooly, M. (2007). Joining forces: P
Page 33: Egbert, J., & Yang, Y.-F. D. (2004)
Page 37 and 38: Finkbeiner, C. (2001). One and all
Page 39 and 40: Fuentes, A. C. (2004). The use of c
Page 41 and 42: Gillespie, J. H., & Barr, J. D. (20
Page 43 and 44: Gray, C., Hagger-Vaughan, L., Pilki
Page 45 and 46: Hager, M., Rieper, A., Schmitt, E.,
Page 47 and 48: Hardy, I. M., & Moore, J. L. (2004)
Page 49 and 50: Hemard, D., & Cushion, S. (2000). F
Page 51 and 52: Holmberg, B. (2003). A theory of di
Page 53 and 54: Huifen, L., Tsuiping, C., & Dwyer,
Page 55 and 56: Jancewicz, B., & MacKenzie, M. (200
Page 57 and 58: Jones, L. C., & Plass, J. L. (2002)
Page 59 and 60: Kawai, G., & Hirose, K. (2000). Tea
Page 61 and 62: Kitajima, R. (2002). Enhancing high
Page 63 and 64: Kupetz, R., & Ziegenmeyer, B. (2005
Page 65 and 66: Larson, J. W. (2000). Testing oral
Page 67 and 68: Lee, L. (2005). Using web-based ins
Page 69 and 70: Lewis, T. (2006). When teaching is
Page 71 and 72: Littlemore, J. (2001). Learner auto
Page 73 and 74: Luke, C. L., & Britten, J. S. (2007
Page 75 and 76: Martin, B. (2006). Using a tablet P
Page 77 and 78: Menzel, W., Herron, D., Moton, R.,
Page 79 and 80: Mills, N., Herron, C., & Cole, S. P
Page 81 and 82: Muniandy, A. V. A. (2002). Electron
Page 83 and 84: Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C., & Strik,
Page 85 and 86:
Nikolova, O. R. (2004). Effects of
Page 87 and 88:
O’Hara, K., & Sellen, A. (1997).
Page 89 and 90:
Parks, S., Huot, D., Hamers, J., &
Page 91 and 92:
Peterson, M. (2001). MOOs and secon
Page 93 and 94:
Potts, D. (2005). Pedagogy, purpose
Page 95 and 96:
Reinhardt, J., & Nelson, B. K. (200
Page 97 and 98:
Rogerson-Revell, P. (2005). A hybri
Page 99 and 100:
Saba, P. (2005). Critical issues in
Page 101 and 102:
Sawaki, Y. (2001). Comparability of
Page 103 and 104:
Seferoglu, G. (2005). Improving stu
Page 105 and 106:
Shaughnessy, M. (2003). CALL, comme
Page 107 and 108:
Simpson, J. (2005). Learning electr
Page 109 and 110:
Smith, B. (2005). The relationship
Page 111 and 112:
Sotillo, S. (2005). Corrective feed
Page 113 and 114:
Stevenson, M., Schoonen, R., & de G
Page 115 and 116:
Sullivan, K., & Lindgren, E. (2002)
Page 117 and 118:
Teeler, D., & Gray, P. (2000). How
Page 119 and 120:
Torlakovic, E., & Deugo, D. (2004).
Page 121 and 122:
Tsubota, Y., Dantsuji, M., & Kawaha
Page 123 and 124:
Verdugo, D. R., & Belmonte, I. A. (
Page 125 and 126:
Wade-Stein, D. & Kintsch, E. (2004)
Page 127 and 128:
Warner, C. N. (2004). It’s just a
Page 129 and 130:
Web-based Education Commission .(20
Page 131 and 132:
Winkler, B. (2001). English learner
Page 133 and 134:
Young, S., & Bloothooft, G. (Eds.).
Page 135:
Zic Fuchs, M. (2002-2003). Communic
show all

Research on CALL and Distance Learning: A Briefly Annotated ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?