Research on CALL and Distance Learning: A Briefly Annotated ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Chin, K. L., & Kon, P. N. (2003). Key factors for a fully online E-Learning mode: A Delphi study. In G. Crisp, D. Thiele, I. Scholten, S. Barker & J. Baron (Eds.), Interact, integrate, impact: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Australasia Keywords: distance learning Summary: Survey of students, teachers, administrators and information technology staff finds different perspectives and priorities of each Chisolm, I. M., & Beckett, E. C. (2003). Teacher preparation for equitable access through the integration of TESOL standards, multiple intelligences and technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Information, 12 (2), 249-275. Keywords: English, young learners, multiple intelligences Summary: Argues for incorporating TESOL standards, CALL, and multiple intelligences to serve English language learners Chiu, C.-Y., & Savignon, S. J. (2006). Writing to mean: Computer-mediated feedback in online tutoring of multidraft compositions. CALICO Journal, 24 (1), 97-114. (https://www.calico.org/p-5-CALICO Journal.html) Keywords: writing, English Summary: Compares content and form-based feedback for two ESL writers; feedback given online Choi, I.-C., Kim, K. S., Boo, J., &. (2003). Comparability of a paper-based language test and a computer-based language test. Language Testing, 20 (3), 295-320. Keywords: assessment, English Summary: Computer-based test comparable to paper-based one Chun, D. (1998). Signal analysis software for teaching discourse intonation. Language Learning & Technology, 2 (1), 61-77. (http://llt.msu.edu) Keywords: pronunciation, software Summary: Reviews a variety of software programs used to teach suprasegmentals Chun, D. (1989). Teaching tone and intonation with microcomputers. CALICO Journal, 7 (1), 21-46. (https://www.calico.org/p-5-CALICO Journal.html) Keywords: pronunciation, visual feedback Summary: Discusses the history of and current uses of visual feedback for pronunciation Chun, D. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22 (1), 17-31. Keywords: German, synchronous CMC Summary: Finds online discussions more interactive and egalitarian than face-to-face ones Chun, D. M. (2001). L2 reading on the Web: Strategies for accessing information in Hypermedia. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 14(5), 367-403. Keywords: Reading, Writing, German, Hypertext Summary: Examines use of textual resources while reading online to perform summarization task. Chun, D. M. (2007). Come ride the wave: But where is it taking us? CALICO Journal, 24 (2), 239-252. (https://www.calico.org/p-5-CALICO Journal.html) Keywords: literature review Summary: Literature review and future directions for CALL 20
Chun, D. M., & Payne, J. S. (2004). What makes students click: Working memory and look-up behavior. System, 32 (4), 481-503. Keywords: reading, vocabulary, German, CD-ROM, working memory Summary: Electronic vocabulary look-up negatively correlates with working memory Chung, Y.-G., Graves, B., Wesche, M., & Barfurth, M. (2005). Computer-mediated communication in Korean-English chat rooms: Tandem learning in an international languages program. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 62 (1), 49-86. Keywords: culture, Korean, English, chat, tandem learning Summary: Uses sociocultural theory to describe and investigate Korean and English tandem learning Clark, N. (2001). Education, communication, and consumption: Piping in the academic community. In C. Werry & M. Mowbray (Eds.), Online communities: Commerce, community action, and the virtual university (pp. 129-151). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Keywords: instructional technology administration Summary: Deconstructs marketing claims made by an educational technology company to depict how virtual interactions can decrease, rather than increase, a sense of community at an academic institution Cobb, T. (1997). Is there any measurable learning from hands-on concordancing? System, 25 (3), 301-315. Keywords: vocabulary, English, concordancer Summary: Use of concordancer shown to produce small but consistent gains in vocabulary acquisition Coffin, C., & Hewings, A. (2005). Engaging electronically: Using CMC to develop students’ argumentation skills in higher education. Language and Education, 19 (1), 32-49. Keywords: writing, chat room, distance learning Summary: Examines teleconferencing as a way to develop rhetorical skills Coleman, J. A. (2005). CALL from the margins: Effective dissemination of CALL research and good practices. ReCALL, 17 (1), 18-31. Keywords: CALL research Summary: Discusses how CALL research and practices can best be disseminated Coll, J. F. (2002). Richness of semantic encoding in a Hypermedia-assisted instructional environment for ESP: Effects on incidental vocabulary retention among learners with low ability in the target language. ReCALL, 14 (2), 263-282. Keywords: vocabulary, English, hypermedia Summary: Touts positive benefits of hypermedia for teaching English-for-special-purposes vocabulary Collentine, J. (2000). Insights into the construction of grammatical knowledge provided by userbehavior tracking technologies. Language Learning & Technology, 3 (2), 44-57. (http://llt.msu.edu) Keywords: grammar, Spanish, video clips; user behavior tracking Summary: User tracking used to investigate inductive grammatical learning in a paraphrasing task 21
Page 1 and 2: Research on CALL a
Page 3 and 4: Abrate, J., & Bowling, T. (2000). P
Page 5 and 6: Appel, C., & Mullen, T. (2002). A n
Page 7 and 8: Bangs, P. (2002). Authoring, pedago
Page 9 and 10: Bednar, A. K., & Charles, M. T. (19
Page 11 and 12: Biesenbach-Lucas, S. (2005). Commun
Page 13 and 14: Böhlke, O. (2003). Adjective produ
Page 15 and 16: Britsch, S. J. (2005). But what did
Page 17 and 18: Cartes-Enriquez, N., Rodriguez, M.
Page 19: Chapelle, C. A. (2004). Technology
Page 23 and 24: Corbeil, G. (2007). Using the Frenc
Page 25 and 26: Cziko, G. A., & Park, S. (2003). In
Page 27 and 28: Davies, G. (2003b). ICT and modern
Page 29 and 30: Delmonte, R. (2003). Linguistic kno
Page 31 and 32: Dooly, M. (2007). Joining forces: P
Page 33 and 34: Egbert, J., & Yang, Y.-F. D. (2004)
Page 35 and 36: Farmer, R., & Gruba, P. (2006). Tow
Page 37 and 38: Finkbeiner, C. (2001). One and all
Page 39 and 40: Fuentes, A. C. (2004). The use of c
Page 41 and 42: Gillespie, J. H., & Barr, J. D. (20
Page 43 and 44: Gray, C., Hagger-Vaughan, L., Pilki
Page 45 and 46: Hager, M., Rieper, A., Schmitt, E.,
Page 47 and 48: Hardy, I. M., & Moore, J. L. (2004)
Page 49 and 50: Hemard, D., & Cushion, S. (2000). F
Page 51 and 52: Holmberg, B. (2003). A theory of di
Page 53 and 54: Huifen, L., Tsuiping, C., & Dwyer,
Page 55 and 56: Jancewicz, B., & MacKenzie, M. (200
Page 57 and 58: Jones, L. C., & Plass, J. L. (2002)
Page 59 and 60: Kawai, G., & Hirose, K. (2000). Tea
Page 61 and 62: Kitajima, R. (2002). Enhancing high
Page 63 and 64: Kupetz, R., & Ziegenmeyer, B. (2005
Page 65 and 66: Larson, J. W. (2000). Testing oral
Page 67 and 68: Lee, L. (2005). Using web-based ins
Page 69 and 70: Lewis, T. (2006). When teaching is
Page 71 and 72:
Littlemore, J. (2001). Learner auto
Page 73 and 74:
Luke, C. L., & Britten, J. S. (2007
Page 75 and 76:
Martin, B. (2006). Using a tablet P
Page 77 and 78:
Menzel, W., Herron, D., Moton, R.,
Page 79 and 80:
Mills, N., Herron, C., & Cole, S. P
Page 81 and 82:
Muniandy, A. V. A. (2002). Electron
Page 83 and 84:
Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C., & Strik,
Page 85 and 86:
Nikolova, O. R. (2004). Effects of
Page 87 and 88:
O’Hara, K., & Sellen, A. (1997).
Page 89 and 90:
Parks, S., Huot, D., Hamers, J., &
Page 91 and 92:
Peterson, M. (2001). MOOs and secon
Page 93 and 94:
Potts, D. (2005). Pedagogy, purpose
Page 95 and 96:
Reinhardt, J., & Nelson, B. K. (200
Page 97 and 98:
Rogerson-Revell, P. (2005). A hybri
Page 99 and 100:
Saba, P. (2005). Critical issues in
Page 101 and 102:
Sawaki, Y. (2001). Comparability of
Page 103 and 104:
Seferoglu, G. (2005). Improving stu
Page 105 and 106:
Shaughnessy, M. (2003). CALL, comme
Page 107 and 108:
Simpson, J. (2005). Learning electr
Page 109 and 110:
Smith, B. (2005). The relationship
Page 111 and 112:
Sotillo, S. (2005). Corrective feed
Page 113 and 114:
Stevenson, M., Schoonen, R., & de G
Page 115 and 116:
Sullivan, K., & Lindgren, E. (2002)
Page 117 and 118:
Teeler, D., & Gray, P. (2000). How
Page 119 and 120:
Torlakovic, E., & Deugo, D. (2004).
Page 121 and 122:
Tsubota, Y., Dantsuji, M., & Kawaha
Page 123 and 124:
Verdugo, D. R., & Belmonte, I. A. (
Page 125 and 126:
Wade-Stein, D. & Kintsch, E. (2004)
Page 127 and 128:
Warner, C. N. (2004). It’s just a
Page 129 and 130:
Web-based Education Commission .(20
Page 131 and 132:
Winkler, B. (2001). English learner
Page 133 and 134:
Young, S., & Bloothooft, G. (Eds.).
Page 135:
Zic Fuchs, M. (2002-2003). Communic
show all

Research on CALL and Distance Learning: A Briefly Annotated ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?