Research on CALL and Distance Learning: A Briefly Annotated ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Chang, L. L. (2007). The effects of using CALL on advanced Chinese foreign language learners. CALICO Journal, 24 (2), 331-353. (https://www.calico.org/p-5-CALICO Journal.html) Keywords: speaking, listening, Chinese, CD-ROM Summary: Students in CALL group significantly outperformed those in traditional classroom group; students also reacted positively to using the program Chang, M.-M. (2005). Applying self-regulated learning strategies in a Web-based instruction— An investigation of motivation perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18 (3), 217-230. Keywords: internet, distance learning Summary: Documents success of an online course design to build motivation and study skills Chang, M. M. (2007). Enhancing web-based language learning through self-monitoring. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23 (3), 187-196. Keywords: reading, English, web software, distance learning Summary: Students who employ a self-monitoring strategy outperform those who do not; lower proficiency students benefit more from self-monitoring than higher proficiency students Chang, M.-M., & Lehman, J. D. (2002). Learning foreign language through an interactive multimedia program: An experimental study on the effects of the relevance component of the ARCS model. CALICO Journal, 20 (1), 81-98. (https://www.calico.org/p-5-CALICO Journal.html) Keywords: English, web software, distance learning Summary: Students shown relevancy of lesson to real-life outperformed students in a control group Chapelle, C. (1997). CALL in the year 2000: Still in search of research paradigms? Language Learning & Technology, 1 (1), 19-43. (http://llt.msu.edu) Keywords: research methods Summary: CALL research should follow other second language classroom research paradigms, particularly interactionist and discourse analysis approaches Chapelle, C. (1998). Multimedia CALL: Lessons to be learned from research on instructed SLA. Language Learning & Technology, 2 (1), 22-34. (http://llt.msu.edu) Keywords: materials development Summary: CALL design features should be based on ideal second language acquisitional situations Chapelle, C. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Keywords: Pedagogy, Assessment, SLA Summary: Covers CALL in language learning, assessment, and SLA research Chapelle, C. (2005). CALICO at center stage: Our emerging rights and responsibilities. CALICO Journal, 23 (1), 5-15. (https://www.calico.org/p-5-CALICO Journal.html) Keywords: CALL Summary: Emphasizes the importance of CALL as a discipline; highlights connections between CALL users and the larger academic community 18
Chapelle, C. A. (2004). Technology and second language learning: Expanding methods and agendas. System, 32 (4), 593-601. Keywords: research Summary: Draws connections between research reported in this System issue and larger research agenda Chapelle, C. A. (2005). CALL the Canadian Way. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 62 (1), 207-219. Keywords: literature review Summary: Highlights Canadian contributions to CALL; examines Canadian CALL as a subfield Chapelle, C. A. (2007). Challenges in evaluation of innovation: Observations from technology research. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1 (1), 30–45. Keywords: CALL evaluation Summary: Discusses the evaluation of CALL materials and practices Chen, C.-F. E. (2006). The development of email literacy: From writing to peers to writing to authority figures. Language Learning & Technology, 10 (2), 35-55. (http://llt.msu.edu) Keywords: Writing, Pragmatics, English, Email Summary: Longitudinal study of an L2 graduate student's development of email literacy and pragmatics Chen, J., Belkada, S., & Okamoto, T. (2004). How a Web-based course facilitates acquisition of English for academic purposes. Language Learning & Technology, 8 (2), 33-49. (http://llt.msu.edu) Keywords: English, web software, English for academic purposes, distance learning Summary: Compares different task types presented in a web-based English-for-academic-purposes course Chenoweth, N. A., & Murday, K. (2003). Measuring student learning in an online French course. CALICO Journal, 20 (2), 285-314. (https://www.calico.org/p-5-CALICO Journal.html) Keywords: French, web software, distance learning Summary: Compares an online French course to comparable classroom course, few differences between the two noted; traditional students reported studying more, and online students perform better in written production task Chenoweth, N. A., Ushida, E.,& Murday, K. (2006). Student learning in hybrid French and Spanish courses: An overview of language online. CALICO Journal, 24 (1), 115-145. (https://www.calico.org/p-5-CALICO Journal.html) Keywords: French, Spanish, hybrid learning Summary: Compares hybrid courses in two languages and at two levels to traditional counterparts; student performance similar across groups Cherny, L. (1999). Conversation and community: Chat in a virtual world. Stanford: CSLI Publications. Keywords: discourse, MUD, synchronous CMC Summary: Provides a discourse analysis of synchronous CMC in group settings (i.e., chat rooms) Chikamatsu, N. (2003). The effects of computer use on L2 Japanese writing. Foreign Language Annals, 36 (1), 114-127. Keywords: writing, Japanese, word processing, email Summary: Kanji produced on computer more accurate than with paper-and-pencil; computer did not lead to more efficient kanji writing; differences in results by proficiency level also noted 19
Page 1 and 2: Research on CALL a
Page 3 and 4: Abrate, J., & Bowling, T. (2000). P
Page 5 and 6: Appel, C., & Mullen, T. (2002). A n
Page 7 and 8: Bangs, P. (2002). Authoring, pedago
Page 9 and 10: Bednar, A. K., & Charles, M. T. (19
Page 11 and 12: Biesenbach-Lucas, S. (2005). Commun
Page 13 and 14: Böhlke, O. (2003). Adjective produ
Page 15 and 16: Britsch, S. J. (2005). But what did
Page 17: Cartes-Enriquez, N., Rodriguez, M.
Page 21 and 22: Chun, D. M., & Payne, J. S. (2004).
Page 23 and 24: Corbeil, G. (2007). Using the Frenc
Page 25 and 26: Cziko, G. A., & Park, S. (2003). In
Page 27 and 28: Davies, G. (2003b). ICT and modern
Page 29 and 30: Delmonte, R. (2003). Linguistic kno
Page 31 and 32: Dooly, M. (2007). Joining forces: P
Page 33 and 34: Egbert, J., & Yang, Y.-F. D. (2004)
Page 35 and 36: Farmer, R., & Gruba, P. (2006). Tow
Page 37 and 38: Finkbeiner, C. (2001). One and all
Page 39 and 40: Fuentes, A. C. (2004). The use of c
Page 41 and 42: Gillespie, J. H., & Barr, J. D. (20
Page 43 and 44: Gray, C., Hagger-Vaughan, L., Pilki
Page 45 and 46: Hager, M., Rieper, A., Schmitt, E.,
Page 47 and 48: Hardy, I. M., & Moore, J. L. (2004)
Page 49 and 50: Hemard, D., & Cushion, S. (2000). F
Page 51 and 52: Holmberg, B. (2003). A theory of di
Page 53 and 54: Huifen, L., Tsuiping, C., & Dwyer,
Page 55 and 56: Jancewicz, B., & MacKenzie, M. (200
Page 57 and 58: Jones, L. C., & Plass, J. L. (2002)
Page 59 and 60: Kawai, G., & Hirose, K. (2000). Tea
Page 61 and 62: Kitajima, R. (2002). Enhancing high
Page 63 and 64: Kupetz, R., & Ziegenmeyer, B. (2005
Page 65 and 66: Larson, J. W. (2000). Testing oral
Page 67 and 68: Lee, L. (2005). Using web-based ins
Page 69 and 70:
Lewis, T. (2006). When teaching is
Page 71 and 72:
Littlemore, J. (2001). Learner auto
Page 73 and 74:
Luke, C. L., & Britten, J. S. (2007
Page 75 and 76:
Martin, B. (2006). Using a tablet P
Page 77 and 78:
Menzel, W., Herron, D., Moton, R.,
Page 79 and 80:
Mills, N., Herron, C., & Cole, S. P
Page 81 and 82:
Muniandy, A. V. A. (2002). Electron
Page 83 and 84:
Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C., & Strik,
Page 85 and 86:
Nikolova, O. R. (2004). Effects of
Page 87 and 88:
O’Hara, K., & Sellen, A. (1997).
Page 89 and 90:
Parks, S., Huot, D., Hamers, J., &
Page 91 and 92:
Peterson, M. (2001). MOOs and secon
Page 93 and 94:
Potts, D. (2005). Pedagogy, purpose
Page 95 and 96:
Reinhardt, J., & Nelson, B. K. (200
Page 97 and 98:
Rogerson-Revell, P. (2005). A hybri
Page 99 and 100:
Saba, P. (2005). Critical issues in
Page 101 and 102:
Sawaki, Y. (2001). Comparability of
Page 103 and 104:
Seferoglu, G. (2005). Improving stu
Page 105 and 106:
Shaughnessy, M. (2003). CALL, comme
Page 107 and 108:
Simpson, J. (2005). Learning electr
Page 109 and 110:
Smith, B. (2005). The relationship
Page 111 and 112:
Sotillo, S. (2005). Corrective feed
Page 113 and 114:
Stevenson, M., Schoonen, R., & de G
Page 115 and 116:
Sullivan, K., & Lindgren, E. (2002)
Page 117 and 118:
Teeler, D., & Gray, P. (2000). How
Page 119 and 120:
Torlakovic, E., & Deugo, D. (2004).
Page 121 and 122:
Tsubota, Y., Dantsuji, M., & Kawaha
Page 123 and 124:
Verdugo, D. R., & Belmonte, I. A. (
Page 125 and 126:
Wade-Stein, D. & Kintsch, E. (2004)
Page 127 and 128:
Warner, C. N. (2004). It’s just a
Page 129 and 130:
Web-based Education Commission .(20
Page 131 and 132:
Winkler, B. (2001). English learner
Page 133 and 134:
Young, S., & Bloothooft, G. (Eds.).
Page 135:
Zic Fuchs, M. (2002-2003). Communic
show all

Research on CALL and Distance Learning: A Briefly Annotated ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?