Research on CALL and Distance Learning: A Briefly Annotated ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Atkinson, T. (1992). Hands off. It’s my go! IT in the languages classroom. London: CILT in association with NCET. (ERIC document Reproduction Service No. ED 350873) Keywords: CALL materials Summary: A guide on IT issues for teachers; topics include hardware, software, and program management Atkinson T. (2002). WWW: the internet (2nd Ed.) (CILT Infotech Series No. 3), London: CILT. Keywords: internet Summary: A guide for teachers on using the internet for language learning Atwell, E., Howarth, P., Souter, C., Baldo, P, Bisiani, R., Pezzotta, D., et al. (2000). User-guided system development in interactive spoken language education. Natural Language Engineering, 6 (3-4), 229-241. Keywords: materials development Summary: Argues for collaboration between language experts and CALL developers Atwell, E., Howarth, P., Souter, C. (2003). The ISLE corpus: Italian and German spoken learners’ English. ICAME Journal, 27 (1), 5-18. Keywords: Italian, German, corpora Summary: Describes a nonnative-speaker spoken corpus annotated for pronunciation errors Auld, G. (2002). The role of the computer in learning Ndjébbana. Language Learning & Technology, 6 (2), 41-58. (http://llt.msu.edu) Keywords: reading (L1), Ndjebbana, talking books; video touch screens Summary: Describes development of CALL materials to promote L1 literacy in endangered indigenous Australian language Ayoun, D. (2000). Web-based elicitation tasks in SLA research. Language Learning & Technology, 3 (2), 77-98. (http://llt.msu.edu) Keywords: grammar, French, software Summary: Describes two software programs used to elicit grammaticality judgments of various types Ayres, R. (2002). Learner attitudes towards the use of CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15 (3), 241-249. Keywords: learner attitudes Summary: Describes learner reactions and attitudes about CALL in the language classroom Baldzis, S. D., Eumeridou, E., & Kolalas, S. (2002). A complete and comprehensive system for modern Greek language processing proposed as a modern Greek language CALL method developer. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 17 (4), 373-400. Keywords: grammar, vocabulary, Modern Greek, software, distance learning Summary: Describes an NLP program for Modern Greek that can be used to teach the language as well Banados, E. (2006). A blended-learning pedagogical model for teaching and learning EFL successfully through an online interactive multimedia environment. CALICO Journal, 23 (3), 533-550. (https://www.calico.org/p-5-CALICO Journal.html) Keywords: English, software, hybrid Summary: Describes English software program used for Chilean university students Bangs, P., & Shield, L. (1999). Why change authors into programmers? ReCALL, 11 (1), 19-29. Keywords: materials development Summary: Evaluates existing web-based CALL programs and provides guidelines for future developers 6
Bangs, P. (2002). Authoring, pedagogy and the Web: Expectations versus reality. International Journal of English Studies Monographs, 2 (Pt. 1). Keywords: software Summary: Evaluates existing web-based CALL programs and provides guidelines for future developers Bangs, P., & Cantos, P. (2004). What can computer assisted language learning contribute to foreign language pedagogy? International Journal of English Studies, 4 (1), 221-239. Keywords: pedagogy Summary: Considers CALL history in relation to behaviorist and communicative methodology; explores future directions Barile, A. L., & Durso, F. T. (2002). Computer-mediated communication in collaborative writing. Computers in Human Behavior, 18 (2), 173-190. Keywords: writing, English (L1), email; synchronous CMC, Summary: Synchronous CMC group outperformed email group in collaborative writing task Barker, A. (2001). Ancient Greek with Thrasymachus: A Web site for learning ancient Greek. CALICO Journal, 18 (2), 393-400. (https://www.calico.org/p-5-CALICO Journal.html) Keywords: reading, grammar, vocabulary, Ancient Greek, website Summary: Details creation of a website to supplement print textbook Bar-Lev, Z. (2004). “Glyphs” and other innovations for Hebrew and Arabic. CALICO Journal, 21 (3), 557-559. (https://www.calico.org/p-5-CALICO Journal.html) Keywords: reading, orthography, Hebrew, Arabic, websites Summary: Describes website used to help teach Hebrew and Arabic scripts Baron, N. S. (2004). See you online: Gender issues in college student use of instant messaging. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23 (4), 397-423. Keywords: English, chat Summary: Describes gender differences among American college students while using instant messaging Barr, D., Leakey, J., & Ranchoux, A. (2005). Told like it is! An evaluation of an integrated oral development pilot project. Language Learning & Technology, 9 (3), 55-78. (http://llt.msu.edu) Keywords: speaking, French, software; computer supervisory hardware; speech recognition, Summary: Traditional classroom outperformed students using CALL for oral skills Barr, J. D., & Gillespie, J. H. (2003). Creating a computer-based language learning environment. ReCALL, 15 (1), 68-78. Keywords: CALL Summary: Explores the integrative uses of technology in the classroom Barrette, C. M. (2001). Students’ preparedness and training for CALL. CALICO Journal, 19 (1), 5-36. (https://www.calico.org/p-5-CALICO Journal.html) Keywords: Spanish, computer literacy Summary: Considers students' computer literacy as a factor in the effectiveness of CALL 7
Page 1 and 2: Research on CALL a
Page 3 and 4: Abrate, J., & Bowling, T. (2000). P
Page 5: Appel, C., & Mullen, T. (2002). A n
Page 9 and 10: Bednar, A. K., & Charles, M. T. (19
Page 11 and 12: Biesenbach-Lucas, S. (2005). Commun
Page 13 and 14: Böhlke, O. (2003). Adjective produ
Page 15 and 16: Britsch, S. J. (2005). But what did
Page 17 and 18: Cartes-Enriquez, N., Rodriguez, M.
Page 19 and 20: Chapelle, C. A. (2004). Technology
Page 21 and 22: Chun, D. M., & Payne, J. S. (2004).
Page 23 and 24: Corbeil, G. (2007). Using the Frenc
Page 25 and 26: Cziko, G. A., & Park, S. (2003). In
Page 27 and 28: Davies, G. (2003b). ICT and modern
Page 29 and 30: Delmonte, R. (2003). Linguistic kno
Page 31 and 32: Dooly, M. (2007). Joining forces: P
Page 33 and 34: Egbert, J., & Yang, Y.-F. D. (2004)
Page 35 and 36: Farmer, R., & Gruba, P. (2006). Tow
Page 37 and 38: Finkbeiner, C. (2001). One and all
Page 39 and 40: Fuentes, A. C. (2004). The use of c
Page 41 and 42: Gillespie, J. H., & Barr, J. D. (20
Page 43 and 44: Gray, C., Hagger-Vaughan, L., Pilki
Page 45 and 46: Hager, M., Rieper, A., Schmitt, E.,
Page 47 and 48: Hardy, I. M., & Moore, J. L. (2004)
Page 49 and 50: Hemard, D., & Cushion, S. (2000). F
Page 51 and 52: Holmberg, B. (2003). A theory of di
Page 53 and 54: Huifen, L., Tsuiping, C., & Dwyer,
Page 55 and 56: Jancewicz, B., & MacKenzie, M. (200
Page 57 and 58:
Jones, L. C., & Plass, J. L. (2002)
Page 59 and 60:
Kawai, G., & Hirose, K. (2000). Tea
Page 61 and 62:
Kitajima, R. (2002). Enhancing high
Page 63 and 64:
Kupetz, R., & Ziegenmeyer, B. (2005
Page 65 and 66:
Larson, J. W. (2000). Testing oral
Page 67 and 68:
Lee, L. (2005). Using web-based ins
Page 69 and 70:
Lewis, T. (2006). When teaching is
Page 71 and 72:
Littlemore, J. (2001). Learner auto
Page 73 and 74:
Luke, C. L., & Britten, J. S. (2007
Page 75 and 76:
Martin, B. (2006). Using a tablet P
Page 77 and 78:
Menzel, W., Herron, D., Moton, R.,
Page 79 and 80:
Mills, N., Herron, C., & Cole, S. P
Page 81 and 82:
Muniandy, A. V. A. (2002). Electron
Page 83 and 84:
Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C., & Strik,
Page 85 and 86:
Nikolova, O. R. (2004). Effects of
Page 87 and 88:
O’Hara, K., & Sellen, A. (1997).
Page 89 and 90:
Parks, S., Huot, D., Hamers, J., &
Page 91 and 92:
Peterson, M. (2001). MOOs and secon
Page 93 and 94:
Potts, D. (2005). Pedagogy, purpose
Page 95 and 96:
Reinhardt, J., & Nelson, B. K. (200
Page 97 and 98:
Rogerson-Revell, P. (2005). A hybri
Page 99 and 100:
Saba, P. (2005). Critical issues in
Page 101 and 102:
Sawaki, Y. (2001). Comparability of
Page 103 and 104:
Seferoglu, G. (2005). Improving stu
Page 105 and 106:
Shaughnessy, M. (2003). CALL, comme
Page 107 and 108:
Simpson, J. (2005). Learning electr
Page 109 and 110:
Smith, B. (2005). The relationship
Page 111 and 112:
Sotillo, S. (2005). Corrective feed
Page 113 and 114:
Stevenson, M., Schoonen, R., & de G
Page 115 and 116:
Sullivan, K., & Lindgren, E. (2002)
Page 117 and 118:
Teeler, D., & Gray, P. (2000). How
Page 119 and 120:
Torlakovic, E., & Deugo, D. (2004).
Page 121 and 122:
Tsubota, Y., Dantsuji, M., & Kawaha
Page 123 and 124:
Verdugo, D. R., & Belmonte, I. A. (
Page 125 and 126:
Wade-Stein, D. & Kintsch, E. (2004)
Page 127 and 128:
Warner, C. N. (2004). It’s just a
Page 129 and 130:
Web-based Education Commission .(20
Page 131 and 132:
Winkler, B. (2001). English learner
Page 133 and 134:
Young, S., & Bloothooft, G. (Eds.).
Page 135:
Zic Fuchs, M. (2002-2003). Communic
show all

Research on CALL and Distance Learning: A Briefly Annotated ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?