Research on CALL and Distance Learning: A Briefly Annotated ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Dutt-Doner, K. M., & Powers, S. (2000). The use of electronic communication to develop alternative avenues for classroom discussion. Journal of technology and teacher education, 8 (2), 153-172. Keywords: CMC Summary: Discusses use of a class newsgroup for class discussion Dybkjaer, L., Bernsen, N. O., & Minker, W. (2004). Evaluation and usability of multimodal spoken language dialogue systems. Speech Communication, 43 (1-2), 33-54. Keywords: speaking, software, hardware Summary: Reviews a variety of European and American unimodal and multimodal speech programs Ebersole, J. (2004). Viewpoint: The future of graduate education. University Business. Retrieved September 3, 2007, from http://www.universitybusiness.com/page.cfm?p=597 Keywords: distance learning Summary: Notes that today's graduate students are increasingly female and older than in previous years; discusses educational implications of these and other changes Edwards, V., Monaghan, F., & Hartley, T. (2000). Bilingual multimedia: Some challenges for teachers. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 13 (3), 264-278. Keywords: reading, European minority languages, software, young learners Summary: Discusses issues related to the creation of electronic bilingual children's books Edwards, V., Monaghan, F., & Knight, J. (2000). Books, pictures and conversations: Using bilingual multimedia storybooks to develop language awareness. Language Awareness, 9 (3), 135-146. Keywords: reading, Welsh, software, young learners Summary: Describes use of a bilingual children's book presented via software that provides audio in both languages, sound effects accompanying the story, and textual marking effects; first-language literacy benefits also observed Edwards, V., Pemberton, L., Knight, J., & Monaghan, F. (2002). Fabula: A bilingual multimedia authoring environment for children exploring minority language. Language Learning & Technology, 6 (2), 59-69. (http://llt.msu.edu) Keywords: reading, European minority languages, software, young learners Summary: Describes FABULA, a European Commission funded project to produce multimedia books in a variety of European minority languages Egbert , J., Paulus, T. M., Nakamichi, Y. (2002). The impact of CALL instruction on classroom computer use: A foundation for rethinking technology in teacher education. Language Learning & Technology, 6 (3), 108-126. (http://llt.msu.edu) Keywords: teacher training Summary: Surveys teachers who had taken a CALL course to see how it had impacted their teaching; familiarity issues, institutional support, and professional collaboration discussed Egbert, J., & Thomas, M. (2001). The new frontier: A case study in applying instructional design for distance teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9 (3), 391- 405. Keywords: teacher training, distance learning Summary: Describes the creation and evaluation of a distance-learning course 32
Egbert, J., & Yang, Y.-F. D. (2004). Mediating the digital divide in CALL classrooms: Promoting effective language tasks in limited technology contexts. ReCALL, 16 (2), 280- 291. Keywords: Digital Divide Summary: Shows how teachers in less technologically developed contexts can use CALL effectively Egert, C. (2000). Language Learning across Campuses. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13 (3), 271-280. Keywords: distance learning, tandem learning Summary: Discusses collaboration across various media by learners from three European countries Ehsani, F., & Knodt, E. (1998). Speech technology in computer-aided language learning: Strengths and limitations of a new CALL paradigm. Language Learning & Teaching, 2 (1), 45-60. Keywords: pronunciation, visual feedback Summary: Describes key design features of speaking feedback software Ehsani, F., Bernstein, J., & Najmi, A. (2000). An interactive dialog system for learning Japanese. Speech Communication, 30 (2-3), 167-177. Keywords: speaking, speech recognition Summary: Argues for incorporating automated speech recognition in language learning Elder, C., Barkhuizen, G., Knoch, U., & Von Randow, J. (2007). Evaluating rater responses to an online training program for L2 writing assessment. Language Testing, 24 (1), 37-64. Keywords: assessment, English, internet, distance learning Summary: Raters trained via online system performed slightly better than those without; wide variation across individual raters noted Ene, E., Goertler, S. E., & McBride, K. (2005). Teacher participation styles in foreign language chats and their effect on student behavior. CALICO Journal, 22 (3), 603-634. (https://www.calico.org/p-5-CALICO Journal.html) Keywords: grammar, German, chat Summary: Specific teacher behaviors seem to affect chat participation more than presence or absence of a teacher in monitored chat discussions; a focus-on-form style appeared to limit student production England, L. (2007). Technology applications in English language teaching in Egyptian universities: A developing relationship. CALICO Journal, 24 (2), 381-406. (https://www.calico.org/p-5-CALICO Journal.html) Keywords: English Summary: Survey results indicate high levels of interest in and use of CALL in Egypt Ercetin, G. (2003). Exploring ESL learners’ use of Hypermedia reading glosses. CALICO Journal, 20 (2), 261-283. (https://www.calico.org/p-5-CALICO Journal.html) Keywords: reading, vocabulary, English, hypertext Summary: Qualitative and quantitative comparison of intermediate and advanced learners' use of hypertext 33
Page 1 and 2: Research on CALL a
Page 3 and 4: Abrate, J., & Bowling, T. (2000). P
Page 5 and 6: Appel, C., & Mullen, T. (2002). A n
Page 7 and 8: Bangs, P. (2002). Authoring, pedago
Page 9 and 10: Bednar, A. K., & Charles, M. T. (19
Page 11 and 12: Biesenbach-Lucas, S. (2005). Commun
Page 13 and 14: Böhlke, O. (2003). Adjective produ
Page 15 and 16: Britsch, S. J. (2005). But what did
Page 17 and 18: Cartes-Enriquez, N., Rodriguez, M.
Page 19 and 20: Chapelle, C. A. (2004). Technology
Page 21 and 22: Chun, D. M., & Payne, J. S. (2004).
Page 23 and 24: Corbeil, G. (2007). Using the Frenc
Page 25 and 26: Cziko, G. A., & Park, S. (2003). In
Page 27 and 28: Davies, G. (2003b). ICT and modern
Page 29 and 30: Delmonte, R. (2003). Linguistic kno
Page 31: Dooly, M. (2007). Joining forces: P
Page 35 and 36: Farmer, R., & Gruba, P. (2006). Tow
Page 37 and 38: Finkbeiner, C. (2001). One and all
Page 39 and 40: Fuentes, A. C. (2004). The use of c
Page 41 and 42: Gillespie, J. H., & Barr, J. D. (20
Page 43 and 44: Gray, C., Hagger-Vaughan, L., Pilki
Page 45 and 46: Hager, M., Rieper, A., Schmitt, E.,
Page 47 and 48: Hardy, I. M., & Moore, J. L. (2004)
Page 49 and 50: Hemard, D., & Cushion, S. (2000). F
Page 51 and 52: Holmberg, B. (2003). A theory of di
Page 53 and 54: Huifen, L., Tsuiping, C., & Dwyer,
Page 55 and 56: Jancewicz, B., & MacKenzie, M. (200
Page 57 and 58: Jones, L. C., & Plass, J. L. (2002)
Page 59 and 60: Kawai, G., & Hirose, K. (2000). Tea
Page 61 and 62: Kitajima, R. (2002). Enhancing high
Page 63 and 64: Kupetz, R., & Ziegenmeyer, B. (2005
Page 65 and 66: Larson, J. W. (2000). Testing oral
Page 67 and 68: Lee, L. (2005). Using web-based ins
Page 69 and 70: Lewis, T. (2006). When teaching is
Page 71 and 72: Littlemore, J. (2001). Learner auto
Page 73 and 74: Luke, C. L., & Britten, J. S. (2007
Page 75 and 76: Martin, B. (2006). Using a tablet P
Page 77 and 78: Menzel, W., Herron, D., Moton, R.,
Page 79 and 80: Mills, N., Herron, C., & Cole, S. P
Page 81 and 82: Muniandy, A. V. A. (2002). Electron
Page 83 and 84:
Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C., & Strik,
Page 85 and 86:
Nikolova, O. R. (2004). Effects of
Page 87 and 88:
O’Hara, K., & Sellen, A. (1997).
Page 89 and 90:
Parks, S., Huot, D., Hamers, J., &
Page 91 and 92:
Peterson, M. (2001). MOOs and secon
Page 93 and 94:
Potts, D. (2005). Pedagogy, purpose
Page 95 and 96:
Reinhardt, J., & Nelson, B. K. (200
Page 97 and 98:
Rogerson-Revell, P. (2005). A hybri
Page 99 and 100:
Saba, P. (2005). Critical issues in
Page 101 and 102:
Sawaki, Y. (2001). Comparability of
Page 103 and 104:
Seferoglu, G. (2005). Improving stu
Page 105 and 106:
Shaughnessy, M. (2003). CALL, comme
Page 107 and 108:
Simpson, J. (2005). Learning electr
Page 109 and 110:
Smith, B. (2005). The relationship
Page 111 and 112:
Sotillo, S. (2005). Corrective feed
Page 113 and 114:
Stevenson, M., Schoonen, R., & de G
Page 115 and 116:
Sullivan, K., & Lindgren, E. (2002)
Page 117 and 118:
Teeler, D., & Gray, P. (2000). How
Page 119 and 120:
Torlakovic, E., & Deugo, D. (2004).
Page 121 and 122:
Tsubota, Y., Dantsuji, M., & Kawaha
Page 123 and 124:
Verdugo, D. R., & Belmonte, I. A. (
Page 125 and 126:
Wade-Stein, D. & Kintsch, E. (2004)
Page 127 and 128:
Warner, C. N. (2004). It’s just a
Page 129 and 130:
Web-based Education Commission .(20
Page 131 and 132:
Winkler, B. (2001). English learner
Page 133 and 134:
Young, S., & Bloothooft, G. (Eds.).
Page 135:
Zic Fuchs, M. (2002-2003). Communic
show all

Research on CALL and Distance Learning: A Briefly Annotated ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?