Research on CALL and Distance Learning: A Briefly Annotated ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Dlaska, A. (2002). Sites of construction: Language learning, multimedia, and the international engineer. Computers & Education, 39 (2), 129-143. Keywords: German, multimedia software Summary: Encourages use of multimedia software for language for specific purposes Dodigovic, M. (2002). Developing writing skills with a Cyber-Coach. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15 (1), 9-25. Keywords: writing, English, English for academic purposes, software Summary: Explores use of software for correcting sentence-level grammar errors in English-for-Academic- Purposes writing Dodigovic, M. (2005). Vocabulary profiling with electronic corpora: A case study in computer assisted needs analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18 (5), 443-455. Keywords: writing, vocabulary, English, corpora Summary: Comparison of student writing to other corpora is used to diagnose vocabulary needs Doering, A., & Beach, R. (2002). Preservice English teachers acquiring literacy practices through technology tools. Language Learning & Technology, 6 (3), 127-146. (http://llt.msu.edu) Keywords: teacher training, writing, English (L1), software, asynchronous CMC Summary: Describes a collaborative effort between preservice English (L1) teachers and middle school students to create multimedia/hypertext projects Dolle, J., & Enjelvin, G. (2003). Investigating “VLE-ffectiveness” in languages. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16 (5), 469-490. Keywords: distance learning Summary: Discusses theoretical basis for distance learning and considerations for evaluation of it Don, M. R. (2005). An investigation of the fundamental characteristics in quality online Spanish instruction. CALICO Journal, 22 (2), 285-306. (https://www.calico.org/p-5-CALICO Journal.html) Keywords: Spanish, distance learning Summary: Discusses a rubric for evaluating distance learning Spanish programs Donaill, C., & Coinnigh, M. M. (2006). The use of CALL in Irish language teaching: The way forward? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19 (4-5), 287-300. Keywords: vocabulary, Irish, video Summary: Outlines resources currently available for teaching Irish online; compares vocabulary acquisition across various tasks involving video clip input and reading text input Donaldson, R. P., & Kötter, M. (1999). Language learning in cyberspace: Teleporting the classroom into the target culture. CALICO Journal, 16 (4), 531-558. (https://www.calico.org/p-5-CALICO Journal.html) Keywords: German, MOO, tandem learning Summary: Describes results of MOO interactions between tandem German and English learners 30
Dooly, M. (2007). Joining forces: Promoting metalinguistic awareness through computersupported collaborative learning. Language Awareness, 16 (1), 57-74. Keywords: teacher training, tandem learning, English Summary: Describes a collaborative project between MA-TESOL students in US, EFL teacher trainees in Spain, and computer science students in Turkey; broad goals for project were language and technological awareness among all three groups Dornisch, M. M. (2002). A case study of student use of asynchronous bulletin board systems (BBS) to support reflection and evaluation. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 30 (3), 365-377. Keywords: hybrid learning Summary: Encourages explicit scaffolding in online discussions to promote learning Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H. (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7 (3), 50-80. (http://llt.msu.edu) Keywords: tasks, psycholinguistics Summary: Illustrates how task-based language teaching principles can be applied to selecting appropriate CALL materials Dreher, P. (2000). Electronic poetry: Student-constructed hypermedia. English Journal, 90 (2), 68-73. Keywords: materials development, English, multimedia, hypermedia Summary: Explores teaching poetry using multimedia and hypermedia Dubois, M., & Vial, I. (2000). Multimedia design: The effects of relating multimodal information. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16 (2), 157-165. Keywords: vocabulary, Russian, software Summary: Results suggest better acquisition occurs when multiple input modes reinforce one another Dubreil, S., Herron, C., & Cole, S. (2004). An empirical investigation of whether authentic Web sites facilitate intermediate-level French language students’ ability to learn culture. CALICO Journal, 22 (1), 41-61. (https://www.calico.org/p-5-CALICO Journal.html) Keywords: culture, French, websites Summary: Finds web surfing to be reasonably successful at teaching elements of French culture DuFon, M. A. (2002). Video recording in ethnographic SLA research: Some issues of validity in data collection. Language Learning & Technology, 6 (1), 40-59. (http://llt.msu.edu) Keywords: research methods, videotaping Summary: Incorporates ethnographic and anthropological theory in a discussion of practical issues surrounding videotaping for second-language-acquisition purposes Dunkel, P. (Ed.). (1991). Computer assisted language learning and testing. New York: Newbury House. Keywords: edited volume Summary: discusses the effectiveness, validity, social aspects and specific applications of CALL Dunsmuir, S., & Clifford, V. (2003). Children’s writing and the use of information and communications technology. Educational Psychology in Practice, 19 (3), 171-187. Keywords: writing, young learners Summary: Explores how technology can be used to facilitate first-language writing acquisition 31
Page 1 and 2: Research on CALL a
Page 3 and 4: Abrate, J., & Bowling, T. (2000). P
Page 5 and 6: Appel, C., & Mullen, T. (2002). A n
Page 7 and 8: Bangs, P. (2002). Authoring, pedago
Page 9 and 10: Bednar, A. K., & Charles, M. T. (19
Page 11 and 12: Biesenbach-Lucas, S. (2005). Commun
Page 13 and 14: Böhlke, O. (2003). Adjective produ
Page 15 and 16: Britsch, S. J. (2005). But what did
Page 17 and 18: Cartes-Enriquez, N., Rodriguez, M.
Page 19 and 20: Chapelle, C. A. (2004). Technology
Page 21 and 22: Chun, D. M., & Payne, J. S. (2004).
Page 23 and 24: Corbeil, G. (2007). Using the Frenc
Page 25 and 26: Cziko, G. A., & Park, S. (2003). In
Page 27 and 28: Davies, G. (2003b). ICT and modern
Page 29: Delmonte, R. (2003). Linguistic kno
Page 33 and 34: Egbert, J., & Yang, Y.-F. D. (2004)
Page 35 and 36: Farmer, R., & Gruba, P. (2006). Tow
Page 37 and 38: Finkbeiner, C. (2001). One and all
Page 39 and 40: Fuentes, A. C. (2004). The use of c
Page 41 and 42: Gillespie, J. H., & Barr, J. D. (20
Page 43 and 44: Gray, C., Hagger-Vaughan, L., Pilki
Page 45 and 46: Hager, M., Rieper, A., Schmitt, E.,
Page 47 and 48: Hardy, I. M., & Moore, J. L. (2004)
Page 49 and 50: Hemard, D., & Cushion, S. (2000). F
Page 51 and 52: Holmberg, B. (2003). A theory of di
Page 53 and 54: Huifen, L., Tsuiping, C., & Dwyer,
Page 55 and 56: Jancewicz, B., & MacKenzie, M. (200
Page 57 and 58: Jones, L. C., & Plass, J. L. (2002)
Page 59 and 60: Kawai, G., & Hirose, K. (2000). Tea
Page 61 and 62: Kitajima, R. (2002). Enhancing high
Page 63 and 64: Kupetz, R., & Ziegenmeyer, B. (2005
Page 65 and 66: Larson, J. W. (2000). Testing oral
Page 67 and 68: Lee, L. (2005). Using web-based ins
Page 69 and 70: Lewis, T. (2006). When teaching is
Page 71 and 72: Littlemore, J. (2001). Learner auto
Page 73 and 74: Luke, C. L., & Britten, J. S. (2007
Page 75 and 76: Martin, B. (2006). Using a tablet P
Page 77 and 78: Menzel, W., Herron, D., Moton, R.,
Page 79 and 80: Mills, N., Herron, C., & Cole, S. P
Page 81 and 82:
Muniandy, A. V. A. (2002). Electron
Page 83 and 84:
Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C., & Strik,
Page 85 and 86:
Nikolova, O. R. (2004). Effects of
Page 87 and 88:
O’Hara, K., & Sellen, A. (1997).
Page 89 and 90:
Parks, S., Huot, D., Hamers, J., &
Page 91 and 92:
Peterson, M. (2001). MOOs and secon
Page 93 and 94:
Potts, D. (2005). Pedagogy, purpose
Page 95 and 96:
Reinhardt, J., & Nelson, B. K. (200
Page 97 and 98:
Rogerson-Revell, P. (2005). A hybri
Page 99 and 100:
Saba, P. (2005). Critical issues in
Page 101 and 102:
Sawaki, Y. (2001). Comparability of
Page 103 and 104:
Seferoglu, G. (2005). Improving stu
Page 105 and 106:
Shaughnessy, M. (2003). CALL, comme
Page 107 and 108:
Simpson, J. (2005). Learning electr
Page 109 and 110:
Smith, B. (2005). The relationship
Page 111 and 112:
Sotillo, S. (2005). Corrective feed
Page 113 and 114:
Stevenson, M., Schoonen, R., & de G
Page 115 and 116:
Sullivan, K., & Lindgren, E. (2002)
Page 117 and 118:
Teeler, D., & Gray, P. (2000). How
Page 119 and 120:
Torlakovic, E., & Deugo, D. (2004).
Page 121 and 122:
Tsubota, Y., Dantsuji, M., & Kawaha
Page 123 and 124:
Verdugo, D. R., & Belmonte, I. A. (
Page 125 and 126:
Wade-Stein, D. & Kintsch, E. (2004)
Page 127 and 128:
Warner, C. N. (2004). It’s just a
Page 129 and 130:
Web-based Education Commission .(20
Page 131 and 132:
Winkler, B. (2001). English learner
Page 133 and 134:
Young, S., & Bloothooft, G. (Eds.).
Page 135:
Zic Fuchs, M. (2002-2003). Communic
show all

Research on CALL and Distance Learning: A Briefly Annotated ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?