INQUIRY
InquiryXIX
InquiryXIX
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
New York University • College of Arts and Science<br />
with larger questions of literary influence, the dialectic of<br />
fiction and reality and the Cinquecento’s apparent engagement<br />
with questions of gender and identity.<br />
Philanthropy: A Staple Piece of British Culture in the<br />
Nineteenth Century<br />
Isabelle Foss, History<br />
Sponsor: Professor Guy Ortolano, History<br />
Philanthropy is much lauded for its connection to<br />
high morality and benevolent spirit as are those involved<br />
within it. However, a deep analysis of its development<br />
during the reign of Queen Victoria (1837–1901) sheds<br />
light on the institutionalization of this enterprise and on<br />
wider reaching changes in the rapidly evolving society<br />
of nineteenth-century Britain. The Industrial Revolution,<br />
which dominated this period, brought not only modernization<br />
but also a whole host of social problems: vast<br />
impoverishment, overcrowding, disease and poor working<br />
conditions, especially in the heavily concentrated industrial<br />
urban centers. Mass welfare provision arose in response to<br />
this situation in the form of philanthropy in a pre-Welfare<br />
State Britain. The cases of four major philanthropists, Lord<br />
Shaftesbury, George Peabody, Angela Burdett-Coutts and<br />
Louisa Twining, each represent key figures that developed<br />
popular philanthropy into an institution and a staple piece<br />
of British culture. This study’s significance arises from its<br />
ability to illuminate broader trends in British society as<br />
well as on welfare aid, which in this period interestingly<br />
was overall inefficient and inadequate when faced with<br />
the depth of the crisis.<br />
Garudas and Nagas: An Eastern Approach to the<br />
Monstrous<br />
Ashley Frenkel, Art History<br />
Sponsor: Professor Kathryn Ann Smith, Art History<br />
Monsters are cathartic: they allow people to project<br />
their unsavory desires onto an acceptable outlet. They<br />
lie on the periphery of the conventional and are some of<br />
the most enduring examples of the power of the human<br />
imagination. This project focuses on western theories of<br />
the monstrous in relation to two Southeast Asian creatures,<br />
garudas and nagas, man-eagle hybrids and serpent spirits<br />
respectively. Garudas and nagas derive from the beliefs<br />
of indigenous religions in southern Asia, but Hinduism<br />
and Buddhism appropriated these figures as a way for<br />
people to reconcile contrasting belief systems. The author<br />
analyzes iconographic evolutions from India, the birthplace<br />
of Buddhism, to other eastern countries such as Tibet and<br />
Thailand. Gandhara in Pakistan, a cultural crossroads of<br />
eastern and western ideas, offers art influenced by both<br />
traditions. It is argued that despite garudas’ and nagas’<br />
similarities to western monsters, neither can be classified<br />
as “monstrous.” The lingering negative connotations of<br />
this western-born concept are neither evident in nor applicable<br />
to the artworks and myths related to these creatures.<br />
This research is significant because it takes a western idea<br />
within a western dominated field and examines the idea<br />
through a lens that shows the intersectionality of seemingly<br />
disparate cultures.<br />
Manuscript Collecting as Statecraft in the Courts of<br />
King Charles V of France and Jean, Duke of Berry,<br />
1364–1416<br />
Nora Gorman, Art History<br />
Sponsor: Professor Carol Krinsky, Art History<br />
Jean, Duke of Berry (1340–1416) is recognized as a<br />
patron whose novel tastes changed the course of art history,<br />
but he was also a shrewd political manipulator. He brokered<br />
key settlements with England during the Hundred Years’<br />
War and, along with his brothers, acted as regent on behalf<br />
of his incapacitated nephew, King Charles VI of France.<br />
This paper argues that Jean’s collecting—especially of<br />
illuminated manuscripts—was part of an established<br />
tradition, one in which the acquisition of objects was a<br />
sophisticated and purposeful expression of royal authority.<br />
Jean’s late brother, Charles V, had used library-building—<br />
a practice appropriated from royal women—to reify the<br />
Valois dynasty’s legitimacy. Moreover, Jean employed<br />
the tradition of collecting in unprecedented ways in order<br />
to expand his power and articulate his individual identity.<br />
Comparative analysis of royal inventories and the iconography<br />
of Jean’s most significant manuscripts reveals<br />
parallels between his collecting and political campaigns<br />
as well as stylistic similarities between his acquisitions<br />
and commissions. This paper takes an interdisciplinary<br />
approach to the study of illuminated manuscripts, engages<br />
with the growing body of knowledge on the history of<br />
collecting and investigates gaps between Anglophone and<br />
French scholarship.<br />
Opening Hearts and Aligning Minds: Counterinsurgency<br />
in Algeria and Iraq<br />
Marian (Nate) Grau, History<br />
Sponsor: Professor Valerie Deacon, History<br />
This paper compares the methods with which the<br />
United States and France attempted to defeat the insurgencies<br />
against which they were pitted in Iraq and Algeria<br />
respectively. French military thought in the late-colonial<br />
period revolved around successfully winning “small wars”<br />
against indigenous uprisings attempting to overthrow<br />
France’s imperial authority after the Second World War,<br />
and many French analyses were instrumental in shaping<br />
how American military thinkers understood their own<br />
situation in Iraq. Yet, for all the attention that was paid<br />
22