14.10.2015 Views

INQUIRY

InquiryXIX

InquiryXIX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

New York University • College of Arts and Science<br />

Three Strikes and You’re Out: Impact of America’s<br />

“Tough on Crime” Policy<br />

Amber Poon, Politics<br />

Sponsor: Professor Oeindrila Dube, Politics<br />

Over the past two decades, the socio-economic implications<br />

of the Three Strikes law, a mandate to increase<br />

sentences for repeat offenders, have drawn nationwide attention<br />

and raised serious questions about the effectiveness of<br />

mass incarceration. Does the adoption of the Three Strikes<br />

law throughout the United States deter violent and property<br />

crimes? And, has Three Strikes placed fiscal constraints on<br />

education, health and public welfare? The cost-effectiveness<br />

of Three Strikes laws remains widely contested in academic,<br />

political and legal circles, and this project seeks to address<br />

these primary questions by conducting a data-driven, empirical<br />

analysis of all 50 states for years 1984–2011. However, it<br />

is important to understand that states adopted Three Strikes<br />

with slight variations in sentencing guidelines that define<br />

third strike charges and prior convictions included under the<br />

law. To address these differences, unlike previous studies,<br />

this study focuses on a sub-group analysis that contrasts<br />

states according to the political party of their governors. On<br />

average, Republican-led states with Three Strikes in place<br />

have a higher incarcerated population than states with a<br />

democratic or independent governor. However, the increase<br />

in prison population does not result in lower crime rates.<br />

Additionally, the impact on state finances is reflected by the<br />

moderate increase in police protection and slight decrease in<br />

welfare spending. Fortunately, despite the policy’s limited<br />

role in crime prevention, virtually no negative impact on<br />

education and health-hospital expenditure, posited by some<br />

studies, was observed.<br />

I Want to Hold Your Hand: Infant Supported Walking<br />

Raquel Rahmey, Psychology<br />

Sponsor: Professor Karen Adolph, Psychology<br />

This project aims to understand the role of “supported<br />

walking” in the development of independent walking. Before<br />

infants can walk independently, caregivers help infants to<br />

walk by holding their hands or supporting their torsos to<br />

provide the necessary balance control that infants cannot<br />

generate on their own. Although supported walking has been<br />

noted in the literature for nearly a century and is recognized<br />

on major milestone charts, researchers know surprisingly<br />

little about the circumstances in which supported walking<br />

occurs and whether supported walking facilitates, impedes<br />

or is inconsequential to the development of walking. This<br />

project addresses these gaps in the literature by describing<br />

supported walking during free play and examining whether<br />

support differs by infants’ locomotor status (whether crawler<br />

or walker), age, walking skill and whether infants are on<br />

the floor or on an elevation. Preliminary findings show that<br />

caregivers provide younger, less experienced walking infants<br />

with more support than older, more experienced walking<br />

infants. Further analyses will examine how much support<br />

infants receive on elevated surfaces and whether support is<br />

related to how well infants walk. This work may aid health<br />

professionals in using caregiver supported walking as a<br />

tool to aid motor development for infants with disabilities.<br />

The Embodiment of Ethnic and Gender Violence:<br />

Trauma Narratives of Rapes and Other Human Rights<br />

Assaults in May 1998 Indonesian Riots<br />

Artricia Marina Rasyid, Anthropology<br />

Sponsor: Professor Angela Zito, Anthropology<br />

In May of 1998, Indonesia’s capital city, Jakarta, was<br />

seized by large-scale riots of mass burning, looting and<br />

rape. To date, scholarship on the riots has emphasized the<br />

racialized nature of the unrest, as the violence was directed<br />

at Indonesia’s ethnic Chinese minority. Comparatively few<br />

studies have focused on the sexual violence component,<br />

which is considered both a juridical and socio-cultural taboo<br />

in Indonesia. Most mass media documented the riots using a<br />

separatist discourse of the native Indonesian “Us” versus the<br />

Chinese “Others” thereby further discursively framing the<br />

riots as an ethnic conflict. Drawing on anthropological theories<br />

of semiotics and contemporary feminist human rights<br />

debates, this thesis contributes to the still-marginal body of<br />

scholarship on cultural productions created on the subject<br />

of May 1998 riots’ Chinese rape victims. The analysis is<br />

based on fieldwork in Jakarta, during which artistic installations,<br />

films and biographies on May 1998 were engaged;<br />

interviews with human rights activists were conducted;<br />

and the repertoires of activists’ campaign materials were<br />

analyzed. This study contends that artistic, or narrativized<br />

symbols, are laden with a sense of national identity and<br />

unity. It is also argued that May 1998 cultural productions<br />

constitute a project of anamnesis, as they invite Chinese<br />

and non-Chinese alike to reimagine their national destiny<br />

and to reclaim their agency in the wake of ethnocidal and<br />

economic violence. Thus, this project extricates the politics<br />

of narrative circulation and interpretation and gauges the<br />

extent to which artistic and cultural projects on May 1998<br />

riots not only signify memories of suffering but also mobilize<br />

a human rights and political claim about gender equality<br />

and racial solidarity.<br />

Reducing Perceived Political Polarization<br />

Odile Rodrik, Psychology<br />

Sponsor: Professor Tessa West, Psychology<br />

This study examined whether having individuals think<br />

about their conflicting goals would increase their accuracy<br />

in estimating the attitudes of members of a rival political<br />

party. Specifically, this study found that Democrats and<br />

64

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!