14.10.2015 Views

INQUIRY

InquiryXIX

InquiryXIX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>INQUIRY</strong> • Volume 19, 2015<br />

crawling more comfortable. Nonetheless, the bias to go over<br />

persisted at levels similar to those observed in Experiment 1.<br />

These findings were taken to mean that walkers have a robust<br />

bias to maintain bipedal gait and generally make highly<br />

consistent motor decisions within and between individuals.<br />

The Effect of Social Class on Interpersonal Orientation<br />

Adam J. Peterson, Psychology<br />

Sponsor: Professor Tessa West, Psychology<br />

Correlational research suggests that higher socioeconomic<br />

status (SES) individuals prioritize independence,<br />

personal freedom and choice whereas lower SES individuals<br />

prioritize interdependence and social connectivity.<br />

Recent experimental research involving subjective SES<br />

manipulations and dependent variables such as empathic<br />

accuracy have supported these findings but fallen short in<br />

explicitly demonstrating a causational link between SES<br />

and interpersonal orientation. The present research sought<br />

to fill this gap by investigating whether inducing high SES<br />

would lead to an independent orientation and inducing low<br />

SES would lead to an interpersonal orientation. Participants<br />

were randomized to either a high or low SES condition and<br />

then had their temporary subjective SES manipulated in<br />

accordance to their condition. Following this, participants<br />

were given behavioral and self-report measures to assess<br />

their interpersonal orientation. Although subjective SES was<br />

successfully manipulated, the results of this manipulation<br />

were insignificant and thus unable to support the notion of<br />

a causational link between SES and interpersonal orientation.<br />

Although this study was unable to provide support<br />

for a causational link, it was still able to replicate previous<br />

correlational findings. Further research should therefore<br />

include a larger sample size to better elucidate the relationship<br />

between subjective SES and interpersonal orientation.<br />

The Roles of Regional Dialect and Language Distance<br />

on Phonetic Convergence<br />

Rebecca Piper, Language and Mind<br />

Sponsor: Professor Susannah Levi, Communicative Sciences<br />

and Disorders, Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and<br />

Human Development<br />

Phonetic convergence is the phenomenon in which<br />

people unintentionally and temporarily change small phonetic<br />

details of their speech to sound more similar to another<br />

talker. Previous research has revealed multiple lexical, social<br />

and task factors that affect the presence and degree of phonetic<br />

convergence. Of interest to the current study are the<br />

influences of regional dialect and language distance, which<br />

is the dialectal similarity of the language of the speaker who<br />

converges and the other talker (the target talker). It is unclear<br />

whether more or less similarity between the dialects of the<br />

two speakers facilitates phonetic convergence. In the current<br />

study, speakers with a General American dialect repeated<br />

words recorded by two target talkers, one with a General<br />

American dialect and the other with a New York City (NYC)<br />

dialect. Results revealed that speakers were more likely to<br />

modify their speech when listening to the General American<br />

talker, supporting the finding that speakers are more likely<br />

to converge when there is greater similarity between their<br />

own dialect and the dialect of the target talker.<br />

International Influence on Ghana’s Healthcare: Implications<br />

for the Millennium Development Goals<br />

Emma Pliskin, Global Public Health/Anthropology<br />

Sponsor: Professor Helena Hansen, Anthropology<br />

The United Nations and its signatories created the Millennium<br />

Development Goals (MDGs) in 2000 as a tangible<br />

timeline and focus for the world’s efforts in improving<br />

livelihoods. The goals, to be met by 2015, focus on eight<br />

categories (eradicate extreme poverty and hunger; achieve<br />

universal primary education; promote gender equality and<br />

empower women; reduce child mortality; improve maternal<br />

health; combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases;<br />

ensure environmental sustainability; and develop a global<br />

partnership for development), and the focus of this study<br />

are the health-specific goals. In considering these goals,<br />

we must necessarily consider the individualized impact<br />

that these words and concepts have on the lived experience<br />

of those under the auspices of these Goals. How do they<br />

affect the day to day? How do they permeate the discourse,<br />

practice and understanding of self in countries implicated by<br />

these goals? What contradictions exist in the space between<br />

those who determine what development should be and those<br />

who embody, or internalize, those ideals? Interviews were<br />

conducted in Accra, Ghana, to better understand the ways in<br />

which international interventions in general are embodied by<br />

those practicing public health, medicine and policy and by<br />

the people with whom they work. This study also examines<br />

the dichotomy between what is “modern” and what is “traditional,”<br />

what “First” and “Third” world means and, finally,<br />

how economic and political structures allow the former to<br />

interpret and define the needs and practices of the latter. It<br />

was found that the idea of “Westernization” was conflated<br />

with “modernization.” Consequently, the MDGs operate<br />

under assumptions that are not necessarily applicable to<br />

the Ghanaian healthcare landscape. The goals manufacture<br />

a healthcare system intended to change the conceptualization<br />

and practice of healthcare into a thriving, “modern”<br />

ideal. Target countries suffer from this misappropriation<br />

and the paradoxes that arise therein. These concepts are thus<br />

essential for the field of global public health and require<br />

anthropological, historical and political consideration in<br />

current developing public health initiatives.<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!