INQUIRY
InquiryXIX
InquiryXIX
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>INQUIRY</strong> • Volume 19, 2015<br />
east, a new university complex, parks, residences, a modern<br />
train station and, most importantly, an Imperial square (the<br />
Kaiserplatz) adorned on three sides by immense stone buildings.<br />
The spacious new boulevards, sightlines and grandiose<br />
architectural language of the new edifices which made up<br />
the “new town” (Neustadt) still stand in stark contrast to the<br />
old city center on the Grande-Île, where winding, narrow<br />
streets are lined with rows of densely-packed half-timbered<br />
houses. This stunning transformation of Strasbourg was not<br />
only the product of political exhibitionism but also an event<br />
intimately inscribed in the major architectural movements<br />
that swept across Europe in the late nineteenth century. The<br />
eighteen hundreds saw the last outpourings of monarchical<br />
ostentation, but they also gave rise to the first age of public<br />
health and the birth of modern city-planning. Yet, unlike the<br />
urban renovations of metropolises like Paris and Vienna, the<br />
extension of Strasbourg left the historic city center largely<br />
intact; exhibitionist tendencies were here tempered by a<br />
respect for the existing urban fabric of the Grande-Île. Alsace<br />
stands in a singular position with relation to its two cultural<br />
parents France and Germany. Strasbourg, as its capital, has<br />
been a cultural center and strategic military point throughout<br />
the ages; today, it is one of the seats of the European Union<br />
and serves both literally and figuratively as the bridge upon<br />
the river Rhine. This study examines the plural impulses<br />
which shaped the urban face of Strasbourg in the Wilhemien<br />
period (1871–1918) and the remarkable changes and<br />
continuities which the city underwent as it passed back into<br />
French hands in the first quarter of the twentieth century.<br />
Formulae of Magick: A Critical Re-Evaluation of Aleister<br />
Crowley’s Magickal View of the World in Light of<br />
Nietzsche’s Gay Science<br />
James M. Kopf, German<br />
Sponsor: Professor Friedrich Ulfers, German<br />
This paper examines the philosophical thought of<br />
Aleister Crowley, an occultist and thinker from early twentieth<br />
century Britain, against a backdrop of Nietzsche’s<br />
philosophy of science. It explores the system of thought<br />
outlined by Aleister Crowley in his major theoretical work,<br />
Magick in Theory and Practice, and places this text in<br />
conversation with Nietzsche, specifically The Gay Science.<br />
Through this process, not only is Crowley’s epistemological<br />
system elucidated but also, hopefully, the meaning of<br />
some of Nietzsche’s seemingly paradoxical statements<br />
on science can be teased out. It is argued that Crowley’s<br />
magickal system is an outgrowth or perhaps even a direct<br />
descendent of Nietzsche’s views on science and the study<br />
of the world, while still retaining a unique identity. This<br />
argument positions a critical reinterpretation of Crowley’s<br />
“magick” as a methodology/scientific system for studying<br />
that world, a system which stands in opposition to the<br />
dominant view of scientific thinking and which is based on<br />
empirical observation and traditional rationality. In so doing,<br />
the author hopes to both construct a critical interpretation of<br />
Crowley’s works and encourage a conversation arguing for a<br />
re-evaluation of Crowley’s thought, which has been unfairly<br />
dismissed, likely, as a result of Crowley’s association with<br />
magic and other widely discredited ideas. Further, following<br />
Nietzsche’s urging in The Gay Science, the author hopes<br />
to spark a conversation on the future of scientific thought.<br />
Defending Architectural Poiesis: Designing the Dynamism<br />
of Life<br />
Sharel Liu, Urban Design and Architecture Studies<br />
Sponsor: Professor Jon Ritter, Urban Design and Architecture<br />
Studies<br />
Architecture is a record of social values that is physically<br />
omnipresent yet subliminally sensate. Stemming from<br />
a long tradition of atavism, architecture swung abruptly to<br />
the dehumanizing functionalism of modernism. Yet, as we<br />
enter postmodernity, how do we recapture the experience of<br />
our age? This epoch is at once dubbed the Digital Age, the<br />
Anthropocene and the age of globalization. Yet, from these<br />
various masks emerges the binding agent of poststructuralism,<br />
a contemporary movement implying that architecture<br />
approaches life as a process. How then do we design architecture<br />
that evolves as a function of life? This study makes<br />
use of design as research, site inspections in New York and<br />
interpretive phenomenological analysis (“IPA”) to investigate<br />
an architectural idiom that enhances the relationships<br />
among architecture, its inhabitants and its surroundings.<br />
By augmenting life’s dynamic interconnectedness, this<br />
architecture model suggests a less anthropocentric and more<br />
truthful understanding of ourselves in how we relate to the<br />
world around us.<br />
Eternalizing the Ephemeral: Photographic Stills of the<br />
José Limón Technique<br />
Charalambia Louka, Neural Science<br />
Sponsor: Professor Maria de Lourdes Dávila, Spanish and<br />
Portuguese<br />
Photographic stills of dance present an ontological<br />
paradox that vacillates between two key philosophies in<br />
the fields of photography and dance: photography is an art<br />
that harnesses the power of existing as an extension of the<br />
real, while dance is an act that ceases to exist the moment a<br />
choreographic moment is complete. It is this contradiction<br />
that has challenged the aim of dance photography in eternalizing<br />
the ephemeral. This study focuses on the ontological<br />
underpinnings of dance photography through an exploration<br />
of dance stills of Mexican choreographer and dancer<br />
José Limón. The José Limón technique is unique in certain<br />
choreographic aspects involving the gravity and respiration<br />
25