14.10.2015 Views

INQUIRY

InquiryXIX

InquiryXIX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>INQUIRY</strong> • Volume 19, 2015<br />

east, a new university complex, parks, residences, a modern<br />

train station and, most importantly, an Imperial square (the<br />

Kaiserplatz) adorned on three sides by immense stone buildings.<br />

The spacious new boulevards, sightlines and grandiose<br />

architectural language of the new edifices which made up<br />

the “new town” (Neustadt) still stand in stark contrast to the<br />

old city center on the Grande-Île, where winding, narrow<br />

streets are lined with rows of densely-packed half-timbered<br />

houses. This stunning transformation of Strasbourg was not<br />

only the product of political exhibitionism but also an event<br />

intimately inscribed in the major architectural movements<br />

that swept across Europe in the late nineteenth century. The<br />

eighteen hundreds saw the last outpourings of monarchical<br />

ostentation, but they also gave rise to the first age of public<br />

health and the birth of modern city-planning. Yet, unlike the<br />

urban renovations of metropolises like Paris and Vienna, the<br />

extension of Strasbourg left the historic city center largely<br />

intact; exhibitionist tendencies were here tempered by a<br />

respect for the existing urban fabric of the Grande-Île. Alsace<br />

stands in a singular position with relation to its two cultural<br />

parents France and Germany. Strasbourg, as its capital, has<br />

been a cultural center and strategic military point throughout<br />

the ages; today, it is one of the seats of the European Union<br />

and serves both literally and figuratively as the bridge upon<br />

the river Rhine. This study examines the plural impulses<br />

which shaped the urban face of Strasbourg in the Wilhemien<br />

period (1871–1918) and the remarkable changes and<br />

continuities which the city underwent as it passed back into<br />

French hands in the first quarter of the twentieth century.<br />

Formulae of Magick: A Critical Re-Evaluation of Aleister<br />

Crowley’s Magickal View of the World in Light of<br />

Nietzsche’s Gay Science<br />

James M. Kopf, German<br />

Sponsor: Professor Friedrich Ulfers, German<br />

This paper examines the philosophical thought of<br />

Aleister Crowley, an occultist and thinker from early twentieth<br />

century Britain, against a backdrop of Nietzsche’s<br />

philosophy of science. It explores the system of thought<br />

outlined by Aleister Crowley in his major theoretical work,<br />

Magick in Theory and Practice, and places this text in<br />

conversation with Nietzsche, specifically The Gay Science.<br />

Through this process, not only is Crowley’s epistemological<br />

system elucidated but also, hopefully, the meaning of<br />

some of Nietzsche’s seemingly paradoxical statements<br />

on science can be teased out. It is argued that Crowley’s<br />

magickal system is an outgrowth or perhaps even a direct<br />

descendent of Nietzsche’s views on science and the study<br />

of the world, while still retaining a unique identity. This<br />

argument positions a critical reinterpretation of Crowley’s<br />

“magick” as a methodology/scientific system for studying<br />

that world, a system which stands in opposition to the<br />

dominant view of scientific thinking and which is based on<br />

empirical observation and traditional rationality. In so doing,<br />

the author hopes to both construct a critical interpretation of<br />

Crowley’s works and encourage a conversation arguing for a<br />

re-evaluation of Crowley’s thought, which has been unfairly<br />

dismissed, likely, as a result of Crowley’s association with<br />

magic and other widely discredited ideas. Further, following<br />

Nietzsche’s urging in The Gay Science, the author hopes<br />

to spark a conversation on the future of scientific thought.<br />

Defending Architectural Poiesis: Designing the Dynamism<br />

of Life<br />

Sharel Liu, Urban Design and Architecture Studies<br />

Sponsor: Professor Jon Ritter, Urban Design and Architecture<br />

Studies<br />

Architecture is a record of social values that is physically<br />

omnipresent yet subliminally sensate. Stemming from<br />

a long tradition of atavism, architecture swung abruptly to<br />

the dehumanizing functionalism of modernism. Yet, as we<br />

enter postmodernity, how do we recapture the experience of<br />

our age? This epoch is at once dubbed the Digital Age, the<br />

Anthropocene and the age of globalization. Yet, from these<br />

various masks emerges the binding agent of poststructuralism,<br />

a contemporary movement implying that architecture<br />

approaches life as a process. How then do we design architecture<br />

that evolves as a function of life? This study makes<br />

use of design as research, site inspections in New York and<br />

interpretive phenomenological analysis (“IPA”) to investigate<br />

an architectural idiom that enhances the relationships<br />

among architecture, its inhabitants and its surroundings.<br />

By augmenting life’s dynamic interconnectedness, this<br />

architecture model suggests a less anthropocentric and more<br />

truthful understanding of ourselves in how we relate to the<br />

world around us.<br />

Eternalizing the Ephemeral: Photographic Stills of the<br />

José Limón Technique<br />

Charalambia Louka, Neural Science<br />

Sponsor: Professor Maria de Lourdes Dávila, Spanish and<br />

Portuguese<br />

Photographic stills of dance present an ontological<br />

paradox that vacillates between two key philosophies in<br />

the fields of photography and dance: photography is an art<br />

that harnesses the power of existing as an extension of the<br />

real, while dance is an act that ceases to exist the moment a<br />

choreographic moment is complete. It is this contradiction<br />

that has challenged the aim of dance photography in eternalizing<br />

the ephemeral. This study focuses on the ontological<br />

underpinnings of dance photography through an exploration<br />

of dance stills of Mexican choreographer and dancer<br />

José Limón. The José Limón technique is unique in certain<br />

choreographic aspects involving the gravity and respiration<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!