FCCC/CP/2015/7
1PYuHQM
1PYuHQM
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>FCCC</strong>/<strong>CP</strong>/<strong>2015</strong>/7<br />
Figure 9<br />
Global emission levels resulting from the implementation of the communicated<br />
intended nationally determined contributions by 2025 and 2030 in comparison with<br />
trajectories consistent with action communicated by Parties for 2020 or earlier<br />
Source: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Report scenario database<br />
and own aggregation.<br />
Abbreviations: AR4 = Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate<br />
Change, GWP = global warming potential, INDCs = intended nationally determined contributions.<br />
200. As illustrated in figure 10, global GHG emissions resulting from the implementation<br />
of the communicated INDCs are generally expected to be lower than the emission levels<br />
according to pre-INDC trajectories by 2.8 (0.2–5.5) Gt CO 2 eq in 2025 and 3.6 (0.0–7.5) Gt<br />
CO 2 eq in 2030. 55, 56 Taking into account the conditional components of the INDCs would<br />
make the upper level of the range 1.0 and 1.9 Gt CO 2 eq higher than with unconditional<br />
components only. 57<br />
55 In some instances, the estimated global emissions at the higher end of the INDC target range would<br />
theoretically result in higher global emissions than in the considered IPCC reference scenario. This<br />
can occur if communicated INDC target growth rates are above the IPCC reference scenario growth<br />
rates for the same sectors and gases.<br />
56 In contrast to the given average reduction, the median reduction resulting from the INDCs below<br />
reference scenarios is 3.0 Gt CO 2 eq in 2025 and 3.0 Gt CO 2 eq in 2030.<br />
57 This excludes an assessment of the conditions related to LULUCF and cases where the extent of the<br />
conditional component of the INDC is uncertain.<br />
43