27.11.2015 Views

DIVING

AnnualDivingReport-2015Edition

AnnualDivingReport-2015Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3. Diving Incident Reporting System<br />

16<br />

14<br />

Number of incident reports<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10<br />

Number of diving days before incident<br />

Figure 3-2 Number of days in the diving series when the incident occurred<br />

Familiarity with the incident dive site was reported in 66 cases. In 34 of those cases (52%), the diver was diving at the<br />

site for the first time while 32 incidents (48%) occurred during return visits. The majority of incidents (59%) took place<br />

during the first dive of the day, 27% during the second dive and 14% the third dive. Inexperience featured prominently<br />

in reported incidents, with 68% of reports involving divers with less than two years since first certified to dive. Indeed, of<br />

the 70 divers who reported their training status, 12 divers (17%) reported having no formal training. Four divers reported<br />

having made 2000 dives or more, (two of those 5000 lifetime dives each). The mean number of dives made by the fifty<br />

other divers who reported their experience was 137 dives (range 0-900). The mean number of dives made within the<br />

previous year, for all divers, was 31 dives (range 1-107) and within the previous month 7 dives (range 1-12).<br />

Characteristics of the divers involved in reported incidents are given in Table 3-1.<br />

Table 3-1 Characteristics of divers involved in reported incidents<br />

Male (n=55) Female (n=15) Overall (n=70, range)<br />

Age 46 (range 17-71) 42 (range 14-64) 45 (range 14-71)<br />

Body Mass Index 22 (n=41, range 13-38) 22 (n=12, range 16-49) 22 (n=53, range 13-49)<br />

Nine of the reports (12%) involved the use of rebreathers while 65 (88%) involved open circuit diving. Four incidents<br />

(5%) occurred at the surface, depth was not reported in 27 cases (36%) and among the remaining 43 reports (60%)<br />

mean depth was 21 msw (69 fsw). Where reported depth was greater than 0 msw (0 fsw), the mean maximum depth of<br />

the dive site was 27 msw (89 fsw). The mean maximum depth ever reached by the diver affected by the incident (n=52<br />

reported, 70%) was 41 msw (135 fsw).<br />

Annual Diving Report – 2012-2015 Edition<br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!