jul-aug2012
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Flight Safety Australia<br />
Issue 87 July–August 2012<br />
11<br />
Sharing the skies<br />
Currently, Australian UAS operations are limited to visual<br />
line-of-sight operations in visual meteorological conditions<br />
(VMC) below 400ft AGL. However, CASA’s Phil Presgrave<br />
says the long-term goal, based on the growing competence<br />
and sophistication of the UAS industry, is to allow routine<br />
operations beyond visual line of sight in VMC/IMC in all<br />
classes of airspace by the end of 2017.<br />
To do this safely, UAS will need reliable and increasingly<br />
sophisticated safety systems. Dr Duncan Campbell, who<br />
heads the Australian Research Centre for Aerospace<br />
Automation (ARCAA) says ARCAA is working with global<br />
industry partners on four main areas around this broad theme.<br />
The first focuses on the development of advanced systems<br />
for navigation, automating airspace management, and<br />
importantly, on dynamic and static ‘detect and avoid’. There<br />
will be a progression towards greater onboard computational<br />
intelligence and autonomous mission replanning, dynamic path<br />
planning, and as the highest priority, an automated emergency<br />
landing system. Secondly, another research area focuses on<br />
developing aviation risk management frameworks and tools<br />
relating to UAS, and appropriate regulation. (Australia led the<br />
way in UAS regulation with its Civil Aviation Safety Regulation<br />
[CASR] Part 101, which is ten years old this year. Only one<br />
other country, the Czech Republic, has formal UAS regulation,<br />
since last year.)<br />
A third research area is focusing on multidisciplinary design<br />
and optimisation, especially human-machine interaction<br />
around multi-UAV mission command. ARCAA is working<br />
with Telecom Bretagne in France and Thales on several<br />
related projects.<br />
And finally, ARCAA is working on advanced sensing for<br />
specific UAS applications.<br />
Peter Smith sees particular potential in the development of<br />
sensors for UAS. He says that as an IT-based technology<br />
UAS have benefited from Moore’s law—the rule of thumb<br />
that says computing power (defined by the number of<br />
transistors on a chip) roughly doubles every two years, with<br />
corresponding benefits in size and cost. ‘It’s happened with<br />
the military already and when civil volume is added, I think<br />
we will get to the point where Moore’s law really shows us<br />
what can be done.<br />
CASA has a full program of planned<br />
training, licensing, certification changes<br />
and education over the short-, mediumand<br />
long-term, from now to 2030:<br />
Integrating remotely-piloted aircraft (RPA)<br />
into airspace<br />
Further developing the rule set—reviewing and<br />
updating CASR part 101, and releasing a suite of<br />
eight advisory circulars: general UAS, training and<br />
licensing, operations, manufacturing and initial<br />
airworthiness, and continuing airworthiness<br />
Regulatory oversight—for CASA, flying RPA safely<br />
is paramount. Illegal operations will be penalised<br />
Education: of the UAS sector, the aviation industry<br />
and the general public.<br />
‘When I first came into the industry ten years ago, the only<br />
sensors were lipstick cameras like the ones fitted to Formula<br />
One cars—they cost a few thousand dollars each and you<br />
could just about see something on the ground from 3000<br />
feet. Then there were infrared sensors, and all you could<br />
see with them was a white blob on the ground. Since then<br />
the resolution of those sensors has roughly doubled every<br />
18 months, to the point where you can carry a useful suite<br />
of sensors in a small UAV. The latest Aerosonde for the US<br />
military allows the operator to differentiate between a shovel<br />
and a weapon in a person’s hand.