26.04.2016 Views

jul-aug2012

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Flight Safety Australia<br />

Issue 87 July–August 2012<br />

11<br />

Sharing the skies<br />

Currently, Australian UAS operations are limited to visual<br />

line-of-sight operations in visual meteorological conditions<br />

(VMC) below 400ft AGL. However, CASA’s Phil Presgrave<br />

says the long-term goal, based on the growing competence<br />

and sophistication of the UAS industry, is to allow routine<br />

operations beyond visual line of sight in VMC/IMC in all<br />

classes of airspace by the end of 2017.<br />

To do this safely, UAS will need reliable and increasingly<br />

sophisticated safety systems. Dr Duncan Campbell, who<br />

heads the Australian Research Centre for Aerospace<br />

Automation (ARCAA) says ARCAA is working with global<br />

industry partners on four main areas around this broad theme.<br />

The first focuses on the development of advanced systems<br />

for navigation, automating airspace management, and<br />

importantly, on dynamic and static ‘detect and avoid’. There<br />

will be a progression towards greater onboard computational<br />

intelligence and autonomous mission replanning, dynamic path<br />

planning, and as the highest priority, an automated emergency<br />

landing system. Secondly, another research area focuses on<br />

developing aviation risk management frameworks and tools<br />

relating to UAS, and appropriate regulation. (Australia led the<br />

way in UAS regulation with its Civil Aviation Safety Regulation<br />

[CASR] Part 101, which is ten years old this year. Only one<br />

other country, the Czech Republic, has formal UAS regulation,<br />

since last year.)<br />

A third research area is focusing on multidisciplinary design<br />

and optimisation, especially human-machine interaction<br />

around multi-UAV mission command. ARCAA is working<br />

with Telecom Bretagne in France and Thales on several<br />

related projects.<br />

And finally, ARCAA is working on advanced sensing for<br />

specific UAS applications.<br />

Peter Smith sees particular potential in the development of<br />

sensors for UAS. He says that as an IT-based technology<br />

UAS have benefited from Moore’s law—the rule of thumb<br />

that says computing power (defined by the number of<br />

transistors on a chip) roughly doubles every two years, with<br />

corresponding benefits in size and cost. ‘It’s happened with<br />

the military already and when civil volume is added, I think<br />

we will get to the point where Moore’s law really shows us<br />

what can be done.<br />

CASA has a full program of planned<br />

training, licensing, certification changes<br />

and education over the short-, mediumand<br />

long-term, from now to 2030:<br />

Integrating remotely-piloted aircraft (RPA)<br />

into airspace<br />

Further developing the rule set—reviewing and<br />

updating CASR part 101, and releasing a suite of<br />

eight advisory circulars: general UAS, training and<br />

licensing, operations, manufacturing and initial<br />

airworthiness, and continuing airworthiness<br />

Regulatory oversight—for CASA, flying RPA safely<br />

is paramount. Illegal operations will be penalised<br />

Education: of the UAS sector, the aviation industry<br />

and the general public.<br />

‘When I first came into the industry ten years ago, the only<br />

sensors were lipstick cameras like the ones fitted to Formula<br />

One cars—they cost a few thousand dollars each and you<br />

could just about see something on the ground from 3000<br />

feet. Then there were infrared sensors, and all you could<br />

see with them was a white blob on the ground. Since then<br />

the resolution of those sensors has roughly doubled every<br />

18 months, to the point where you can carry a useful suite<br />

of sensors in a small UAV. The latest Aerosonde for the US<br />

military allows the operator to differentiate between a shovel<br />

and a weapon in a person’s hand.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!