jul-aug2012
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Flight Safety Australia<br />
Issue 87 July–August 2012<br />
59<br />
The single runway at Islamabad Airport is oriented 12-30.<br />
Approach procedures are for ILS, DME, VOR and straight-in<br />
approaches to runway 30, and a circling approach to land on<br />
runway 12. There are two prohibited areas in the vicinity, one to<br />
the south-west and another to the north-east, and a hilly area to<br />
the north-east of the airport.<br />
As the aircraft neared Islamabad, the crew realised that, after<br />
making an instrument descent on the ILS for runway 30, they<br />
would be required to execute a visual circling approach to<br />
runway 12. Becoming increasingly worried about poor weather<br />
and low cloud, the captain called Islamabad Approach to<br />
request a right-hand, downwind visual approach to the runway.<br />
The radar controller refused this, because of ‘procedural<br />
limitations’.<br />
The captain then decided to fly the circling approach in<br />
navigation mode, and the aircraft began descending at 8.58am.<br />
Shortly afterwards, the radar controller informed the aircraft to<br />
‘expect arrival to ILS, runway 30, circle to land runway 12’.<br />
The first officer then asked Approach if they could now<br />
be cleared to a ‘right downwind runway 12 for the approach’.<br />
This time the controller responded:<br />
‘Right downwind runway 12 is not available at<br />
the moment because of low clouds’.<br />
Acknowledging, the captain responded: ‘we understand right<br />
downwind is not available—it will be ILS down to minima and<br />
then left downwind—OK?’ The crew then discussed a waypoint<br />
five nm to the north-east of the runway, on a radial 026 from<br />
the runway 12 threshold. Discussion followed on another<br />
intended waypoint.<br />
At 9.34am, with the A321 now down to an altitude of 4300ft, the<br />
radar controller cleared it to descend to 3900ft in preparation for<br />
intercepting the ILS for runway 30, to be followed by a circling<br />
approach to land on runway 12. Two minutes later, at an altitude<br />
of 3700ft, the aircraft became established on the ILS with both<br />
autopilots engaged, and the crew extended the undercarriage.<br />
Now in contact with the control tower, the crew again asked:<br />
‘How’s the weather for a right downwind?’ The tower controller<br />
responded that a right downwind was not available—only a left<br />
downwind for runway 12.<br />
It was the captain’s intention to descend to 2000ft on the ILS,<br />
(little more than 300 feet above the runway altitude of 1688ft)<br />
but the first officer reminded him that 2500ft was minimum<br />
descent altitude.<br />
The crew levelled out at 2500ft, disengaged no. 2 autopilot, and<br />
with only no. 1 autopilot engaged, continued to fly the aircraft<br />
on the runway heading to the VOR.<br />
The crew’s intended break-off to the right from the ILS approach<br />
to fly the right downwind circuit was delayed because they had<br />
not become visual in the poor visibility. Meanwhile, the tower’s<br />
confirmation that an aircraft of a competing airline had just landed<br />
safely (albeit on the third attempt) put the captain under more<br />
pressure to complete his approach and landing.<br />
Almost immediately the aircraft broke out of cloud, and the tower<br />
instructed the crew to report when established on a left downwind<br />
for runway 12. Seconds later, passing over the VOR, 0.8km short<br />
of the runway 30 threshold, the crew turned the aircraft to the right<br />
on the autopilot, and very shortly afterwards lowered the selected<br />
altitude to 2300ft, presumably in an effort to remain visual in the<br />
poor conditions. The aircraft began descending again, violating the<br />
minimum descent altitude.<br />
The tower controller now suggested to the captain that he fly a<br />
bad weather circuit, but the captain ignored this transmission,<br />
commenting to the first officer: ‘Let him say whatever he wants<br />
to say’. It was evident that the captain had already decided to fly a<br />
‘managed approach’, using waypoints unknown to Islamabad Air<br />
Traffic Control.<br />
Although the captain had said he would fly the circling approach in<br />
the navigation mode, the aircraft was still in the heading mode. The<br />
first officer pointed this out, saying: ‘OK sir, but are you visual?’<br />
The captain replied, ‘Visual! OK’.<br />
While planning for his intended approach pattern, the captain told<br />
the first officer where in the circuit he was to extend the flaps.<br />
At 9.39am, when the aircraft was more than 3.5nm from the