26.04.2016 Views

jul-aug2012

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Flight Safety Australia<br />

Issue 87 July–August 2012<br />

59<br />

The single runway at Islamabad Airport is oriented 12-30.<br />

Approach procedures are for ILS, DME, VOR and straight-in<br />

approaches to runway 30, and a circling approach to land on<br />

runway 12. There are two prohibited areas in the vicinity, one to<br />

the south-west and another to the north-east, and a hilly area to<br />

the north-east of the airport.<br />

As the aircraft neared Islamabad, the crew realised that, after<br />

making an instrument descent on the ILS for runway 30, they<br />

would be required to execute a visual circling approach to<br />

runway 12. Becoming increasingly worried about poor weather<br />

and low cloud, the captain called Islamabad Approach to<br />

request a right-hand, downwind visual approach to the runway.<br />

The radar controller refused this, because of ‘procedural<br />

limitations’.<br />

The captain then decided to fly the circling approach in<br />

navigation mode, and the aircraft began descending at 8.58am.<br />

Shortly afterwards, the radar controller informed the aircraft to<br />

‘expect arrival to ILS, runway 30, circle to land runway 12’.<br />

The first officer then asked Approach if they could now<br />

be cleared to a ‘right downwind runway 12 for the approach’.<br />

This time the controller responded:<br />

‘Right downwind runway 12 is not available at<br />

the moment because of low clouds’.<br />

Acknowledging, the captain responded: ‘we understand right<br />

downwind is not available—it will be ILS down to minima and<br />

then left downwind—OK?’ The crew then discussed a waypoint<br />

five nm to the north-east of the runway, on a radial 026 from<br />

the runway 12 threshold. Discussion followed on another<br />

intended waypoint.<br />

At 9.34am, with the A321 now down to an altitude of 4300ft, the<br />

radar controller cleared it to descend to 3900ft in preparation for<br />

intercepting the ILS for runway 30, to be followed by a circling<br />

approach to land on runway 12. Two minutes later, at an altitude<br />

of 3700ft, the aircraft became established on the ILS with both<br />

autopilots engaged, and the crew extended the undercarriage.<br />

Now in contact with the control tower, the crew again asked:<br />

‘How’s the weather for a right downwind?’ The tower controller<br />

responded that a right downwind was not available—only a left<br />

downwind for runway 12.<br />

It was the captain’s intention to descend to 2000ft on the ILS,<br />

(little more than 300 feet above the runway altitude of 1688ft)<br />

but the first officer reminded him that 2500ft was minimum<br />

descent altitude.<br />

The crew levelled out at 2500ft, disengaged no. 2 autopilot, and<br />

with only no. 1 autopilot engaged, continued to fly the aircraft<br />

on the runway heading to the VOR.<br />

The crew’s intended break-off to the right from the ILS approach<br />

to fly the right downwind circuit was delayed because they had<br />

not become visual in the poor visibility. Meanwhile, the tower’s<br />

confirmation that an aircraft of a competing airline had just landed<br />

safely (albeit on the third attempt) put the captain under more<br />

pressure to complete his approach and landing.<br />

Almost immediately the aircraft broke out of cloud, and the tower<br />

instructed the crew to report when established on a left downwind<br />

for runway 12. Seconds later, passing over the VOR, 0.8km short<br />

of the runway 30 threshold, the crew turned the aircraft to the right<br />

on the autopilot, and very shortly afterwards lowered the selected<br />

altitude to 2300ft, presumably in an effort to remain visual in the<br />

poor conditions. The aircraft began descending again, violating the<br />

minimum descent altitude.<br />

The tower controller now suggested to the captain that he fly a<br />

bad weather circuit, but the captain ignored this transmission,<br />

commenting to the first officer: ‘Let him say whatever he wants<br />

to say’. It was evident that the captain had already decided to fly a<br />

‘managed approach’, using waypoints unknown to Islamabad Air<br />

Traffic Control.<br />

Although the captain had said he would fly the circling approach in<br />

the navigation mode, the aircraft was still in the heading mode. The<br />

first officer pointed this out, saying: ‘OK sir, but are you visual?’<br />

The captain replied, ‘Visual! OK’.<br />

While planning for his intended approach pattern, the captain told<br />

the first officer where in the circuit he was to extend the flaps.<br />

At 9.39am, when the aircraft was more than 3.5nm from the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!