jul-aug2012
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Flight Safety Australia<br />
Issue 87 July–August 2012<br />
23<br />
Threat species by climate zone<br />
4<br />
6<br />
te zone<br />
Number of aerodromes<br />
One third of the respondents stated that foreign object damage<br />
(FOD) control is the sole responsibility of airport operators<br />
or local council personnel, whilst 25 per cent see FOD as the<br />
responsibility of everyone working airside.<br />
Just under half of the responding aerodromes have a runway<br />
safety program in place.<br />
Airport runway safety program<br />
45<br />
40<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
Very small<br />
0–1000<br />
annual movements<br />
Small<br />
1000–5000<br />
Medium<br />
5000–20,000<br />
Yes<br />
No<br />
Unknown<br />
Large<br />
more than<br />
20,000<br />
34<br />
30<br />
20<br />
14<br />
28<br />
Kangaroo/Wallaby<br />
5<br />
7<br />
11<br />
21<br />
Galah<br />
8<br />
18<br />
13<br />
11<br />
2<br />
5<br />
9<br />
Lapwing/Plover<br />
3<br />
7<br />
8<br />
Flying Fox/Bat<br />
1<br />
4<br />
Kite<br />
10<br />
25 30 35<br />
One section in the questionnaire was dedicated to wildlife<br />
unt of eight or more management. The majority of respondents indicated that their<br />
aerodrome has a wildlife hazard management plan. Around 30 per<br />
cent of the smaller airports (those with fewer than 5000 annual<br />
aircraft movements) do not have such a plan. When these figures<br />
are ranked according to aerodrome type—registered versus<br />
certified—only 20 per cent of registered aerodromes have a wildlife<br />
hazard management plan, as opposed to 80 per cent of the certified<br />
aerodromes. Almost 80 per cent of aerodromes that carried out a<br />
risk assessment said they had a wildlife hazard management plan.<br />
Most respondents rated the risk of wildlife on their airport as<br />
low, with the larger aerodromes often reporting a medium risk<br />
(46 per cent). Generally, tropical and subtropical area aerodromes<br />
rated their wildlife risk as higher than the operators in more<br />
temperate regions.<br />
Respondents who rated the risk of wildlife as medium or high were<br />
asked to indicate the specific species that posed the highest risk on<br />
their aerodrome. A maximum of three species could be selected.<br />
The results are shown opposite, broken down by climate zones.<br />
13<br />
Ibis<br />
1<br />
4<br />
6<br />
9<br />
Duck<br />
Magpie<br />
Note: flying-fox/bat–only species with a count of eight or more<br />
are displayed<br />
Tropical and Equatorial<br />
Subtropical<br />
Desert and Grassland – hot<br />
Desert and Grassland – temperate<br />
Temperate and Alpine<br />
2<br />
7<br />
4