26.04.2016 Views

jul-aug2012

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Flight Safety Australia<br />

Issue 87 July–August 2012<br />

23<br />

Threat species by climate zone<br />

4<br />

6<br />

te zone<br />

Number of aerodromes<br />

One third of the respondents stated that foreign object damage<br />

(FOD) control is the sole responsibility of airport operators<br />

or local council personnel, whilst 25 per cent see FOD as the<br />

responsibility of everyone working airside.<br />

Just under half of the responding aerodromes have a runway<br />

safety program in place.<br />

Airport runway safety program<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Very small<br />

0–1000<br />

annual movements<br />

Small<br />

1000–5000<br />

Medium<br />

5000–20,000<br />

Yes<br />

No<br />

Unknown<br />

Large<br />

more than<br />

20,000<br />

34<br />

30<br />

20<br />

14<br />

28<br />

Kangaroo/Wallaby<br />

5<br />

7<br />

11<br />

21<br />

Galah<br />

8<br />

18<br />

13<br />

11<br />

2<br />

5<br />

9<br />

Lapwing/Plover<br />

3<br />

7<br />

8<br />

Flying Fox/Bat<br />

1<br />

4<br />

Kite<br />

10<br />

25 30 35<br />

One section in the questionnaire was dedicated to wildlife<br />

unt of eight or more management. The majority of respondents indicated that their<br />

aerodrome has a wildlife hazard management plan. Around 30 per<br />

cent of the smaller airports (those with fewer than 5000 annual<br />

aircraft movements) do not have such a plan. When these figures<br />

are ranked according to aerodrome type—registered versus<br />

certified—only 20 per cent of registered aerodromes have a wildlife<br />

hazard management plan, as opposed to 80 per cent of the certified<br />

aerodromes. Almost 80 per cent of aerodromes that carried out a<br />

risk assessment said they had a wildlife hazard management plan.<br />

Most respondents rated the risk of wildlife on their airport as<br />

low, with the larger aerodromes often reporting a medium risk<br />

(46 per cent). Generally, tropical and subtropical area aerodromes<br />

rated their wildlife risk as higher than the operators in more<br />

temperate regions.<br />

Respondents who rated the risk of wildlife as medium or high were<br />

asked to indicate the specific species that posed the highest risk on<br />

their aerodrome. A maximum of three species could be selected.<br />

The results are shown opposite, broken down by climate zones.<br />

13<br />

Ibis<br />

1<br />

4<br />

6<br />

9<br />

Duck<br />

Magpie<br />

Note: flying-fox/bat–only species with a count of eight or more<br />

are displayed<br />

Tropical and Equatorial<br />

Subtropical<br />

Desert and Grassland – hot<br />

Desert and Grassland – temperate<br />

Temperate and Alpine<br />

2<br />

7<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!