17.06.2016 Views

EUROHEALTH

Eurohealth-volume22-number2-2016

Eurohealth-volume22-number2-2016

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

46<br />

Ensuring eeuitable access to cost-effective medicines and technology<br />

patient medicines are covered. Medicines<br />

are the main driver of out-of-pocket (OOP)<br />

payments and a key source of catastrophic<br />

health expenditures and impoverishment<br />

in most transition countries. Moldova is<br />

no exception. In 2014, nearly 94% of total<br />

expenditures on medicines were borne<br />

by patients as direct OOP payments. 3<br />

The Government has taken steps towards<br />

securing timely and equitable access<br />

to medicines by developing and<br />

implementing national programmes for<br />

the main non-communicable diseases<br />

(NCDs) (diabetes, mental health, cancer,<br />

cardiovascular diseases), communicable<br />

diseases (tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS,<br />

hepatitis, immunizations), rare diseases,<br />

transplantations, congenital pathology,<br />

blood products security and emergency<br />

care. In 2013, access to insulin was<br />

improved by including it in the positive list<br />

of medicines eligible for reimbursement<br />

(previously insulin was only procured<br />

through a separately funded national<br />

programme). While adding it to the<br />

positive list of medicines seemed to<br />

improve access to antidiabetic treatments<br />

for patients, the additional cost, due to<br />

distribution through pharmacies and<br />

insulin now subject to retail mark-ups, had<br />

a negative impact on the budget. Increased<br />

expenditure is also likely to have been<br />

due to improved access. Considering the<br />

growing prevalence of chronic diseases<br />

and only partial health coverage, the<br />

main burden of medicine expenditures<br />

remains with patients and their families. 4<br />

In this context, efficient use of limited<br />

resources, smart selection of medicines<br />

and responsible use of medicines become<br />

important tools to improve financial<br />

‘‘<br />

protection and meet population needs.<br />

increase<br />

expenditure on<br />

medicines from<br />

4.3% to 10% of<br />

total NHIC<br />

expenditure<br />

Essential Medicines List<br />

The essential medicines list (EML) is a<br />

list of medicines deemed necessary to<br />

meet priority health care needs of the<br />

population. These medicines should be<br />

available in health systems at all times,<br />

in adequate amounts, in the appropriate<br />

dosages, with assured quality, and at a<br />

price the individual and the community<br />

can afford. 5 Moldova started to implement<br />

the EML and to promote its rational use<br />

in the public and private health sector in<br />

the mid-1990s. 6 7 The national list was<br />

developed in 2002 and it was intended<br />

to be regularly updated every two years.<br />

However, the EML has only been revised<br />

three times since its launch. During<br />

these revisions, the number of medicines<br />

listed has gradually increased from 506<br />

international non-proprietary names<br />

(INN) in 2007 to 585 INNs in 2009<br />

and 650 INNs in 2011. The next revision of<br />

the EML is expected in 2016.<br />

Pricing of medicines<br />

High prices of medicines substantially<br />

affect patient access to medicines,<br />

especially in low and middle-income<br />

countries. The Republic of Moldova<br />

introduced its first price control policies<br />

in 1995. 8 All levels of medicines prices<br />

have been subject to regulation in a stepwise<br />

manner. Manufacturer prices for all<br />

medicines (including over-the-counter<br />

medicines, or OTCs) have been fixed<br />

using external price referencing, based<br />

on a basket including eleven countries.<br />

The wholesale mark-up has been limited<br />

to a maximum of 15% of the ex-factory<br />

procurement price and the retail mark-up<br />

to 25% of the wholesaler procurement<br />

price. All medicines are subject to 8%<br />

value added tax, which is less than the<br />

normal VAT rate of 20%.<br />

Access to medicines<br />

Despite all efforts and policy changes,<br />

total health expenditure has increased<br />

over the last ten years, including OOP<br />

expenditure on medicines and medical<br />

supplies. 9 10 Affordability of partially<br />

reimbursed medicines for the treatment<br />

of NCDs has improved since the<br />

introduction of the first reimbursement<br />

list in 2006 for all income and expenditure<br />

quintiles. 9 However, this improvement<br />

was mainly driven by higher income and<br />

expenditure by households rather than<br />

an actual increase in coverage of the<br />

reimbursement list. 9<br />

New policy initiative<br />

Several policy options can be considered to<br />

increase coverage for essential medicines.<br />

Depending on its design, a price reduction<br />

policy can have a wide reaching effect<br />

on medicines affordability, beyond<br />

reimbursed medicines. On the demand<br />

side, the National Health Insurance<br />

Company has set the objective to increase<br />

expenditure on medicines from 4.3%<br />

to 10% of its total expenditure in 2017. The<br />

available budget for medicines has grown<br />

by almost 140% since 2010. 11 Another<br />

objective is to reduce OOP expenditures<br />

(not just medicine-related expenditure)<br />

from the baseline of 72% to 65% of total<br />

OOP expenditures by 2017. Reducing<br />

medicine prices will reduce household<br />

expenditure provided consumption does<br />

not increase. Besides regulating ex-factory<br />

prices, it is important to reduce excessive<br />

charges being added to medicines as they<br />

move through the supply chain. Moldova is<br />

already regulating the maximum levels of<br />

distribution mark-ups, so the next step was<br />

to introduce a regressive mark-up scheme.<br />

This policy option has been widely used<br />

globally in low and middle-income, as well<br />

12 13<br />

as high-income countries.<br />

Significant variability exists in the<br />

methods for calculating and controlling<br />

the size of mark-ups. A single model<br />

does not fit all settings. Early in 2015, an<br />

initiative to increase financial protection<br />

for the population was developed by the<br />

Parliament and subsequently underwent<br />

intensive rounds of consultation led by the<br />

Ministry of Health with technical support<br />

from the World Health Organization. Two<br />

main models were considered, one based<br />

on three price segments (less than 50<br />

lei (€2.40); 51 – 150 lei (€7.20); more<br />

than 151 lei) and the second based on five<br />

price segments (less than 30 lei (€1.40);<br />

31 – 60 lei (€2.90); 61 – 120 lei (€5.70);<br />

121 – 240 lei (€11.5); more than 241 lei).<br />

Other country’s experiences – such as<br />

the Baltic countries and Romania – were<br />

explored and adapted to the Moldovan<br />

context. A simulation model based on<br />

five price segments was designed using<br />

Eurohealth — Vol.22 | No.2 | 2016

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!