19.06.2016 Views

Reinventing Manufacturing

eayWVRd

eayWVRd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Reinventing</strong> <strong>Manufacturing</strong><br />

California’s high workers’ compensation premiums are<br />

attributable to higher-than-average utilization. California’s<br />

rate of work injury claims per 1,000 workers<br />

is 46 percent higher than the national average. While<br />

reduced claim frequency has been driving rates lower<br />

across the country, in California, claim frequency increases<br />

of 3.2 percent in 2012 and 3.9 percent in 2013 have<br />

been pushing expenses higher. 47<br />

California’s system is also more expensive to run because<br />

of complex administrative features, which were<br />

the target of Senate Bill 863, passed in 2012. The legislation<br />

aims to reduce “friction” in the system and generate<br />

savings to enable employer premium reductions.<br />

To date, potential savings, estimated at $200 million<br />

annually (or 1.2 percent of total system costs) have been<br />

eclipsed by claim payment increases. 48<br />

Limited Land Availability for Industrial Use in<br />

Urban Areas<br />

In California’s two leading manufacturing regions, the<br />

San Francisco Bay Area and Los Angeles, manufacturing<br />

development is being constrained by a lack of land<br />

availability as well as by a scarcity of vacant manufacturing<br />

facilities that could be repurposed for alternative<br />

uses. Bay Area industrial vacancy rates are currently<br />

approaching the historic low levels set in the late 1990s<br />

during the dot-com boom. Larger manufacturers are<br />

beginning to look outside of the immediate Bay Area to<br />

markets in San Joaquin County where available options<br />

and rental rates are more favorable.<br />

In Los Angeles, a manufacturing base that was located<br />

within the central urban core has continually been<br />

pushed to outlying areas as land use policies have<br />

shifted. The City of Los Angeles has only 8 percent of its<br />

total land base zoned for industrial uses; however, nearly<br />

30 percent of this land has already been redeployed<br />

for commercial and residential uses. Competition for<br />

industrially-zoned land in Los Angeles remains high as<br />

evidenced by its 3 percent industrial vacancy rate, the<br />

lowest of any metropolitan area in the state.<br />

Industrial land use policies can alleviate some of the<br />

land availability issues that manufacturers encounter<br />

in California. Industrial zone policies date back to the<br />

1980s when Chicago, New York City, and Portland<br />

created planned manufacturing districts in order to<br />

protect industrial land that was being encroached upon<br />

by residential uses. Manufacturers in these districts were<br />

afforded special rights, such as expedited permitting<br />

for building expansion and eligibility for special<br />

financing options, and they received benefits, such as<br />

city-provided infrastructure spending on new bridges<br />

and streets and on improved transit and transportation<br />

options to support employment.<br />

More recently, New York City created 15 Industrial Business<br />

Zones in 2006. These zones were intended to foster<br />

real estate support for manufacturers by limiting the<br />

potential for residential rezoning, along with tax credits<br />

and zone-specific planning efforts supporting business<br />

relocation. Since that time, a large amount of land in<br />

these industrial safe havens has been converted to commercial<br />

uses—prompting the New York City Council to<br />

reevaluate its land use policies for manufacturing.<br />

64

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!